• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the Baz Luhrman film of Shakespeare's play, Romeo and Juliet obscure or illuminate the text?

Extracts from this document...


Does the Baz Luhrman film of Shakespeare's play, Romeo and Juliet obscure or illuminate the text? Alex Langley In my essay I will set out to consider whether Mr Luhrmans masterpiece obscures or illuminates the original text of Shakespeare Romeo and Juliet. In 1992, film director Baz Luhrman set out to construct a modern day version of Romeo and Juliet. The blockbuster was set in modern day Mexico City. Luhrman used this urban setting as the original setting, Verona. The setting is proposed to remind viewers of a characteristic American city such as LA. His aim was to establish a new audience to the excitements of Shakespeare by using a blend of dazzling imagery, music and action. Luhrman also uses a variety of professional techniques such as Montage and Juxtaposition. "Two households, both alike in dignity, In fair Verona where we lay our scene." The design of Shakespeare's prologue is to acquaint the audience to the characters. In Luhrmans opening, the prologue is illustrated with media imagery. I feel this works well because it ties in with modern life. Luhrman also uses rapid cutting clips to draw in an action thrilled audience. It keeps the audience thrilled because of its prompt energetic movement. Another technique used is repeating language to help the audience acclimatise to it. I feel this is and admirable idea because the most off-putting aspect of Shakespeare is often the language and by duplicating it, it gives the audience more chance of understanding it. ...read more.


The Meeting of Romeo and Juliet is composed by Mr Luhrman in such an elegant style, using the fish tank as another masterpiece of imagery. The tank itself is symbolic, as it is full of astonishing fish that are trapped in the same way that Romeo and Juliet are trapped in their family's conflict. To an uneducated viewer, Friar Lawrence's decision to marry two young people who have only been acquainted for a limited number of hours seems irresponsible and illogical, though Mr Luhrman shows his reasons in an understandable way. Luhrman illuminates this moment by developing a montage of images, of the fire and violence between the two families. This permits the audience to see the reasons behind Friar Lawrence's actions and shows that he agrees to marry the youths as a bond to cease the hostility between the two families. This montage of images clarify s Shakespeare text by showing Friar Lawrence's thoughts in an obvious way, if this were not to happen then various viewers may not comprehend his reasons and find it irrational. In Act 3 Scene 1, Luhrman cunningly uses Juxtaposition to alter from a scene showing Juliet's contentment juxtaposed with Romeo's difference with Tybalt. Some would argue that this technique distorts Shakespeare's text by cutting between two separate scenes, though in his defence, Mr Luhrman claims that "this technique adds dramatic irony as the audience is able to see the events that will destroy Juliet's happiness. " I personally consider that this technique work well because it is swift and dramatic and it enlightens the fact that these events will devastate the contentment of Romeo and Juliet. ...read more.


In the text of the play, it states that Romeo dies before Juliet awakes. In Luhrmans film, it shows Juliet awakening as Romeo drinks the poison. This change in the story does obscure the text though it is cleverly used to create a dramatic ending. I feel it did not obscure the text too dramatically and I believe that a play should be open to interpretation, within reason. "I will raise her statue in pure gold" As the play comes to a close, there is a glimmer of hope and peace as the families promise to end their conflict. Luhrman, on the other hand cuts this optimistic ending and opts for a negative ending. "all are punished!" I do not agree with the way Luhrman has ended this and would opt for a more positive ending to put a more positive spin on Romeo and Juliet's love. Instead I feel Luhrman has made their love feel negative and downbeat. I think Luhrman gave the film a negative ending to dramatically improve the ending and to have a twist at the end than having the same old happy ending. I though Baz Luhrman had succeeded in a seemingly impossible task of modernising Romeo and Juliet. I feel he did the best he could under the circumstances although on occasions it did obscure the text. I feel 75% of the film worked, while the other 25% slightly obscured the text. I feel using techniques such as repeating 13th Century text, imagery of water and imagery of fire worked well with the play and overall I feel Luhrman did a marvellous job. I exceedingly enjoyed the film. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How does Shakespeare use imagery in his play Romeo and Juliet to intensify the ...

    4 star(s)

    The nature of love has changed. In the opening scene Romeo saw love like a child and was very confused but now he his not confused and truly loves Juliet although before he supposedly loved Rosaline, which we later find to be false love.

  2. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    Thou canst not teach me to forget." (I,i,238-246) Here, Romeo is saying how much he loves Rosaline, and that he cannot forget about her. However, a couple of scenes later, his love quickly changes: "O, she doth teach the torches to burn bright!

  1. Romeo and Juliet - How has Baz Luhrman used film techniques to create a ...

    The two families being either side of Jesus would also indicate the names had great power and importance as they were at a gods level. This would encourage the viewers that there was arch rivalry and heavy competition, which

  2. Compare the ways in which William Shakespeare and Baz Luhrman make the scene interesting ...

    Capulet tells Tybalt just to "endure" him. This conversation between Tybalt and Capulet and Tybalt's reaction to Romeo causes tension because despite Capulet telling Tybalt to leave him alone you can't help but think that Tybalt won't let it go.

  1. Baz Luhrman's Interpretation of William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet".

    It looks as though it is being filmed live because of it's quick erratic and shaking shots from the helicopter. This gives the impression that it is like live news coverage of a terrible disaster as Luhrmann has made it looke rough, but on purpose.

  2. Analysis of the party scene from Luhrman's production of Romeo and Juliet

    Romeo first sees just Juliet's eye, this close-up shocks the audience as much as the character's as it is an unusual choice for the meeting. Because it is just her eye, it creates the feeling that the eye is the window to the soul.

  1. Show how Baz Luhrman's film opening attempts to the link the language of the ...

    statues of Christ and crosses on top of churches. The importance of both the Montagues and Capulets is shown with images in the opening. In a way this echoes Shakespeare use of the word 'civil' in the prologue, representing the city and citizens of Verona.

  2. Analyse Act 1 Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet Compare the original text ...

    Another very noticeable difference is the setting. In the original text, it is set in the Italian town of Verona, whereas in the film version it is set in a laid-back American town.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work