• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does 'The crucible' by Arthur Miller emphasise the very best or the worst of human behaviour? How is this behaviour presented to us?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does 'The crucible' by Arthur Miller emphasise the very best or the worst of human behaviour? How is this behaviour presented to us? Arthur Miller's 'The crucible' is a play that shows the extremes of human behaviour both good and bad. In this essay I will be discussing these extremes and also hope the essay will help me conclude whether the best or the worst of human behaviour is presented more strongly. I will also aim to link these themes to events, which would have affected the author at the time the play written. I will give examples of each type of behaviour and conclude. I will start by explaining about the background of 'the crucible'. Arthur Miller wrote it in 1950's America but it is set in Salem 1692. Salem was a puritan community that because of the time had very little scientific knowledge so blamed any unexplained happenings on witchcraft. If someone was accused of witchcraft and confessed they were saved from being hanged but if they denied the charges then they were almost definitely hanged. This is how the witch-hunt began, people would be accused and they would confess and blame others and in turn the others accused would accuse someone else. Miller's reasons for writing this play were mainly because the events' happening in the 1950's America. ...read more.

Middle

There is danger for me. I dare not step outside at night!" I think Arthur Miller has been very successful in the character of Parris because although he doesn't actually cause any of the damage directly he still makes him a thoroughly unpleasant character and I think that the audience would feel the same. I personally feel sorry for Parris because he isn't a bad man he's just a pathetic one. I think a scene which shows a lot of the worst behaviour is act three in the court. The obvious examples are from Abigail and the girls when they pretend to be bewitched by Mary who gets terrified at their act. Their reason for doing this is that Abigail is angry with Mary for betraying them and wants her to be accused of witchcraft so that she has no choice but to go back and join them. The audience I think would have particularly drawn into the scene because it is very tense and a lot of things happen. When Elizabeth lies for John and when John is arrested I think would have been parts that made the audience particularly angry with Abigail. Miller creates tension in this scene especially in the part where Mary is getting hysterical with the girls repeating every word Mary says and stamping their feet. ...read more.

Conclusion

This essay has discussed many things that featured in 'The Crucible' such as conscience and the way Arthur Miller made his characters either liked or disliked. All of the characters in this play were put under extreme pressure and in these situations the best scenes in the play arise. Overall I think that the best of human behaviour was presented more strongly than the worst because the characters that have the best behaviour are more strongly presented. But saying that Arthur Miller does successfully portray the worst of behaviour also because none of his characters are two-dimensional they all his separate lives which intertwine and so you feel for all of them even those who responsible for the deaths. In my introduction I aimed to show the parallels between puritan Salem and the anti communist feelings of right wing America. I have done so. The audience at both the time this was written and in the present day would find this play both emotionally challenging and exciting. The reaction to the last scene probably would have been tears, as I myself was close to tears when watching the film version. I also have achieved the link between the interrogation of Arthur Miller over his political beliefs and the witch hunts in Salem 1692, His reaction to the hysteria and how he wrote the play in protest to the somewhat ludicrous questioning of people in Salem. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Analyse the ways in which the themes of intimidation and persecution are presented in ...

    Parris wants Tituba to confess, "You will confess yourself or I will take you out and whip you to your death, Tituba!" This shows Parris was persecuting Tituba as he was going to hurt her. You can tell he was shouting, as there's an explanation mark at the end of the quote.

  2. The Crucible - summary.

    obvious falsehood, yet the court accepts it as truth because they have established that such evidence is irrefutable proof. The chapter culminates to encompass two central ironies. The first of these is that, to prove his own innocence and prove himself faithful to his wife, John Proctor must publicly declare his infidelity.

  1. How Does Arthur Miller Present The Characters of Abigail and Elizabeth and Shape Our ...

    And this works because of the context of suspicion in the society of Salem in the 1690s. The audience's response to Abigail's first lie is frustration and anger as she has gained so much power without any substantial proof of her accusations and their response to her second lie is

  2. The Crucible by Arthur Miller - Abigail Williams - Character Study.

    He calls, 'How do you call Heaven?! Whore! Whore!' Danforth pursues this radical statement and is enlightened as to Abigail and John's previous involvement. The revelation of this scandal would undoubtedly be detrimental to Proctors cause, as it would label him a sinner and therefore untrustworthy and possibly in league with the devil considering his position.

  1. Crucible confession

    If Elizabeth's morals come above her love for Proctor she could tell the court that he committed lechery and in this bizarre sequence of events this could save her life. This moment in the play may be seen as a build up to the confession and execution of John Proctor.

  2. "The Crucible" Essay

    Elizabeth 'faintly' says 'no, sir' and Danforth calls for her to be sent away, as so Proctor cries out 'Elizabeth, I have confessed it!' and she is left staggered as she says 'Oh, God!' and the door closes behind her.

  1. The Crucible - analysing acts 3 and 4.

    Analyse of the Two Key Moments ACT 3 Miller choose to have this moment, in Act 3, because you know what happens after. At the end of Act 4, Proctor is signing a confession to show he has met the Devil, and to say he has not had an affair.

  2. Diary 1 - Hopes and Fears.

    a lot more before I speak and especially before I speak to Eddie because he's such a serious guy. Eddie told me that Immigration Bureau had snitches on their pay role all over the place and that I should learn to be more careful when I talk to people and even with people who I really trust.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work