• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does 'The crucible' by Arthur Miller emphasise the very best or the worst of human behaviour? How is this behaviour presented to us?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does 'The crucible' by Arthur Miller emphasise the very best or the worst of human behaviour? How is this behaviour presented to us? Arthur Miller's 'The crucible' is a play that shows the extremes of human behaviour both good and bad. In this essay I will be discussing these extremes and also hope the essay will help me conclude whether the best or the worst of human behaviour is presented more strongly. I will also aim to link these themes to events, which would have affected the author at the time the play written. I will give examples of each type of behaviour and conclude. I will start by explaining about the background of 'the crucible'. Arthur Miller wrote it in 1950's America but it is set in Salem 1692. Salem was a puritan community that because of the time had very little scientific knowledge so blamed any unexplained happenings on witchcraft. If someone was accused of witchcraft and confessed they were saved from being hanged but if they denied the charges then they were almost definitely hanged. This is how the witch-hunt began, people would be accused and they would confess and blame others and in turn the others accused would accuse someone else. Miller's reasons for writing this play were mainly because the events' happening in the 1950's America. ...read more.

Middle

There is danger for me. I dare not step outside at night!" I think Arthur Miller has been very successful in the character of Parris because although he doesn't actually cause any of the damage directly he still makes him a thoroughly unpleasant character and I think that the audience would feel the same. I personally feel sorry for Parris because he isn't a bad man he's just a pathetic one. I think a scene which shows a lot of the worst behaviour is act three in the court. The obvious examples are from Abigail and the girls when they pretend to be bewitched by Mary who gets terrified at their act. Their reason for doing this is that Abigail is angry with Mary for betraying them and wants her to be accused of witchcraft so that she has no choice but to go back and join them. The audience I think would have particularly drawn into the scene because it is very tense and a lot of things happen. When Elizabeth lies for John and when John is arrested I think would have been parts that made the audience particularly angry with Abigail. Miller creates tension in this scene especially in the part where Mary is getting hysterical with the girls repeating every word Mary says and stamping their feet. ...read more.

Conclusion

This essay has discussed many things that featured in 'The Crucible' such as conscience and the way Arthur Miller made his characters either liked or disliked. All of the characters in this play were put under extreme pressure and in these situations the best scenes in the play arise. Overall I think that the best of human behaviour was presented more strongly than the worst because the characters that have the best behaviour are more strongly presented. But saying that Arthur Miller does successfully portray the worst of behaviour also because none of his characters are two-dimensional they all his separate lives which intertwine and so you feel for all of them even those who responsible for the deaths. In my introduction I aimed to show the parallels between puritan Salem and the anti communist feelings of right wing America. I have done so. The audience at both the time this was written and in the present day would find this play both emotionally challenging and exciting. The reaction to the last scene probably would have been tears, as I myself was close to tears when watching the film version. I also have achieved the link between the interrogation of Arthur Miller over his political beliefs and the witch hunts in Salem 1692, His reaction to the hysteria and how he wrote the play in protest to the somewhat ludicrous questioning of people in Salem. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Analyse the ways in which the themes of intimidation and persecution are presented in ...

    Abigail lies "I never sold myself! I'm a good girl! I'm proper girl!" Miller shows Abigail is getting angry because there are explanation marks at the end of each sentence. It is dramatic irony, the audience know that Abigail had an affaire with John but the characters don't.

  2. How Does Arthur Miller Present The Characters of Abigail and Elizabeth and Shape Our ...

    And this works because of the context of suspicion in the society of Salem in the 1690s. The audience's response to Abigail's first lie is frustration and anger as she has gained so much power without any substantial proof of her accusations and their response to her second lie is

  1. The Crucible - summary.

    a fire is burning because the court is pulling Heaven down and raising up a whore. Hale denounces the proceedings and quits the court. Analysis: Among the characters in the play, it is Deputy Governor Danforth who seems to provide the most obvious symbol of Senator Joseph McCarthy.

  2. The Crucible by Arthur Miller - Abigail Williams - Character Study.

    Mary, being familiar with this routine knows it to be foolproof and could spell her doom. John however, aware of Abigail's insidiousness and outraged by her temerity when calling heavenly father seizes her by the hair and wrenches her to her feet, dispelling the illusion and shocking the court.

  1. Crucible confession

    The audience may feel that when Proctor is eating the stew the atmosphere is uneasy. Proctor's comment of the stew may suggest that Elizabeth is asking for his acceptance. Though when Proctor kisses her after his meal it says in the stage directions that she accepts it but he is left disappointed.

  2. "The Crucible" Essay

    Elizabeth 'faintly' says 'no, sir' and Danforth calls for her to be sent away, as so Proctor cries out 'Elizabeth, I have confessed it!' and she is left staggered as she says 'Oh, God!' and the door closes behind her.

  1. The Crucible - analysing acts 3 and 4.

    These three characters were the judges, but they would not be as dramatic and neither strong, unless there is one person who rules, making that character more remembered, and more important to the play.

  2. Diary 1 - Hopes and Fears.

    He totally blew his top off ordering me not to say a word about our cousins to anyone, not even to grandma. Now that I think about it I realise that I should never have asked such a dumb question in the first place, I've got to learn to think

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work