Dr Jekll and Mr Hyde

Authors Avatar

Nirali Patel

Mrs Dodd

Explore How Stevenson Creates a Sense of Intrigue and Engages the Reader’s Interest in Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde

In this essay I am going to be exploring how Stevenson examines Victorian hypocrisy and human nature, the duality of man, in his famous tale, The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. His novella, written in 1886, was set in London, and is described as a gothic horror. Stevenson uses Mr Utterson, a ‘modest’ lawyer, to guide us through the novella, unravelling to the mystery gradually throughout the novella. By revealing a few clues at a time, many questions emerge in the reader’s mind, however, only a few of these are answered throughout the tale. Stevenson uses a wide range of language and structural devices to build a sense of intrigue and engage the reader.

Dr Jekyll, a renowned London scientist, was born into a wealthy family with great honour and had gained respect from his fellow men. Dr Jekyll struggled with the dual nature of his nature and although he was loyal to his friends, Jekyll had a dark side, which he choice to express in the person of Mr Hyde. He noticed that ‘man is not truly one, but truly two’ and this lead him to ‘recognise the thorough and primitive duality of man’. Jekyll saw the need to hide Hyde from the world since he was forced to be respectable and loyal to everyone around him due to his class since birth. However, Dr Jekyll had suppressed his ‘pleasures’ for too long and his darker side grew stronger and stronger inside him throughout his life. Many of the ‘pleasures’ Hyde was able to have included drinking alcohol, and gambling as well as being able to fulfill many of his sexual desires. I believe that Jekyll was guilty of ‘that crime upon so pitiful as provocation’, which he committed through Hyde, because he had a choice to drink the potion again and carrying on with his devilish deeds or suppress his darker side from committing such devious crimes. Jekyll, himself, couldn’t resist and was too ‘tempted’ to drink more of the potion again ‘with strong courage’, eve though he was aware of the consequences he will have to face. Stevenson engages the readers by using many negative adjectives to describe Hyde, which suggest he is a villain. When Utterson questions the maid the morning after the politician, Mr Carew, was murdered, she explains to Utterson that ‘all of a sudden’ Hyde ‘broke out in a flame of anger, stamping his foot, brandishing his cane and carrying on like a madman’. This is shocking to the reader because a man who owned a cane in Victorian society was known to be a respectable gentleman. Hyde is also described, by the maid, to have had ‘ape-like fury’. Being compared to an ‘ape’ was said to someone who is a person who resembles a nonhuman primate and has so much rage to the point of committing the most unspeakable horror against innocence. Utterson is biased when guiding the reader through the novella. In the first chapter, Story of the Door, Utterson tells us that he is a ‘modest man’ and that his friends are ‘those of his own blood’. The reader is influenced to think that Jekyll, having been stated as a ‘good friend’, belongs to the same middle-class society as Mr Utterson does. So when Jekyll commits his ‘devilish’ deeds, the reader is shocked because men of the middle-class societies are known to be humble and loyal, not ‘evil’.

Join now!

Stevenson creates intrigue for the reader by using long, lengthy descriptions in the narration in order to draw out the highly gruesome aspects of the scene set in The Carew Murder Case. Around the scene of the incident, there was a ‘misty fog’ and clouds ‘over the city’ while the ‘full moon’ lit up the night. The ‘full moon’ associates with the time when evil beings, often shown as deformed men or werewolves, commit their most heinous acts. The ‘fog’ suggests intrigue and mystery. Stevenson uses highly descriptive language during the attack. The maid explains to Utterson how Mr Carew, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

The Quality of Written Communication is average. There are no glaring spelling mistakes, and none that compromise the clarity of the response, though there are moment were the sentence syntax feels very forced such as in the introductory paragraph - "Stevenson uses Mr Utterson, a ‘modest’ lawyer, to guide us through the novella, unravelling to the mystery gradually throughout the novella." The repetition of "through(out) the novella" suggests that the candidate accidentally re-used the same phrase and whilst this does not make the intended meaning ambiguous, it does show examiner that the candidate may not have been paying attention when they wrote the introduction, as that is generally reflected in it's poor quality in comparison to the rest of the essay.

The Level of Analysis is very good, and indicative of a low A grade candidate for GCSE. There is is sound demonstration of understanding of the novel and a selection of appropriate scenes and even small descriptions have been identified for analysis. The comments on the duality of Dr. Jekyll are very good as they directly create suspense perhaps not with an audience of today, who are familiarised with bastardised slasher-film adaptations of the book, but certainly with a nineteenth century audience - it may have been prudent to comment on this briefly, to show a realisation that the novella does not evoke the same level of suspense of intrigue that it may have had when originally published (though it could be argued in the candidates favour, that this would only contribute to a small number of context marks, and contextual appreciation is abundant in numerous other places within the essay response). The introductory and conclusive paragraphs need a little work, as the introductions feel very unconvincing and forced as if the candidate is struggling to be inventive with the language and give any clear inclination as to what it is they are analysing - a good tip here is to use the words of the question and explicitly state what elements of the novel/novella you will address in order to do such analysis. As for the conclusive paragraph; there doesn't appear to be one. This suggests the candidate ran short of time or simply forgot to do so, but this is not acceptable for GCSE coursework/exam scripts as the conclusion is meant to tie up all the comments made earlier and establish a link between them all that directly answers the question proposed - new ideas should not be present in a conclusion.

This answer is in response to a question discussing the creation of suspense and intrigue in the readers' minds about the plot of Robert Louis Stevenson's 'The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde'. In this answer, there is a good focus established and all the analysis is suitably aimed at the creation of suspense and intrigue, with the candidate discussing in some detail the use of thematic elements, contextual factors, and literary devices such as pathetic fallacy (very briefly mentioned rather than properly analysed in the chapter 'The Last Night'). The answer is coherent and touches on a number of moments during the entirety of the novella that lend themselves well to analysis of the creation of dramatic suspense.