• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Dunkirk and the battle of Britain All three of the sources A, B and are useful in their own unique way, but they all have limitations, so they can only describe a small snippet out of the big picture, on how it was like at the battle f Dunkirk on the beaches. Source A seemed useful to me, because it gave me a real idea about the atmosphere and morale, when the British undertook the rescue. The person giving the statement is commander Thomas Kerr, who was one of the naval officers sent to organize the evacuation. Seeing that he is of this rank, he seems that he is trustworthy because as commander he seems trustworthy. I also noted that the statement was a very personal one because the way he spoke about the British side, it would have been censored. ...read more.

Middle

The source is also primary meaning that he actually witnessed it, so perhaps it gives us a realistic idea on how the battle was like. Source B was also useful because analyzing the evidence we had of the battle, it seems that he is giving more of a factual statement than a opinion, making it more believable. This statement is also primary; it was from a seaman manning one of the boats of the minesweeper, Bill Elmslie. So seeing that he was in the middle of this all, it does look like he's trustworthy. I got a firm idea about how it was on the beaches by the way he writes: "I glanced back at the beach and saw a german fighter streak across the sand, his machine guns cutting through those columns of soldiers like reapers through corn", that really paints a realistic picture. ...read more.

Conclusion

If there were French or German accounts to back these up then it would have been more convincing. Also these sources don't tell me a lot, they give me snippets of what happened, they don't give me the build up to it, or the actual plans for the evacuation. I feel that all three sources were useful in their own respective way, because they gave me opinion, fact, and blatant government propaganda to boost morale. They do have their limitations but despite these I still get a few aspects of Dunkirk, the disorganization or as the commander called it "rabble". I would have liked to see more factual statements instead of opiniated ones; it would have been more convincing and reliable, because it could be backed up by statistics. Also a few German and French statements would really have backed up the events and given a more reliable account of the battle of Dunkirk. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Casualties were greatest amongst the escort units. Standard tactics for raids soon became an amalgam of techniques. A free hunt would precede a raid to try and sweep any defenders out of the raid's path. The bombers would penetrate at altitudes between 10,000 and 16,000 feet, sometimes closely escorted by fighters.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    This tactical error made by the Germans would have handed an advantage to the British. Dowding also advised the Royal Air Force to sent squadrons of planes out at a time instead of sending all of the planes out at once.

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    By requesting these armaments shows that he seems to have accepted that all had not gone to plan. This source has been written in a rushed and eager fashion with carelessness with both men and arms. We can see his heavy-handed approach - not the attitude of a great General.

  2. Battle of Britain

    It was the loss of trained pilots that was crippling the RAF, and the real battle had yet to begin. The German's had set "Eagle Day" for 10th August, as soon as the radar network had been taken out. By now, the weather intervened and the attack on the radar stations could not take place until August 12th.

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    She sincerely believes that if Britain had been invaded the War may have had a different outcome, but she also mentioned the fact that if Hitler hadn't bombed pearl harbour, the Americans would have kept to themselves. But since they did, America joined the allies, and with the massive American force and Britain's exceptional Navy, the war was won.

  2. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    In his opening paragraph of his first speech, Churchill says 'we have to think of the future and not of the past' he wants the public and the troops to forget the Dunkirk evacuation, making it sound like it did not matter.

  1. Battle of Britain.

    Because of this emotional content, it is very effective in reaching its audience and getting people to understand what the pilots went through. However one of its main weaknesses is the fact of personal aggrandisement and is glorifying himself, because he has been injured very badly, he wanted to say

  2. Source based work on The evacuation at Dunkirk.

    It also shows how people where terrified of being killed. This source is also written in the past tense so we can't tell long after event this was written so we can not be sure how accurate the account is.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work