• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

Extracts from this document...


Dunkirk and the battle of Britain All three of the sources A, B and are useful in their own unique way, but they all have limitations, so they can only describe a small snippet out of the big picture, on how it was like at the battle f Dunkirk on the beaches. Source A seemed useful to me, because it gave me a real idea about the atmosphere and morale, when the British undertook the rescue. The person giving the statement is commander Thomas Kerr, who was one of the naval officers sent to organize the evacuation. Seeing that he is of this rank, he seems that he is trustworthy because as commander he seems trustworthy. I also noted that the statement was a very personal one because the way he spoke about the British side, it would have been censored. ...read more.


The source is also primary meaning that he actually witnessed it, so perhaps it gives us a realistic idea on how the battle was like. Source B was also useful because analyzing the evidence we had of the battle, it seems that he is giving more of a factual statement than a opinion, making it more believable. This statement is also primary; it was from a seaman manning one of the boats of the minesweeper, Bill Elmslie. So seeing that he was in the middle of this all, it does look like he's trustworthy. I got a firm idea about how it was on the beaches by the way he writes: "I glanced back at the beach and saw a german fighter streak across the sand, his machine guns cutting through those columns of soldiers like reapers through corn", that really paints a realistic picture. ...read more.


If there were French or German accounts to back these up then it would have been more convincing. Also these sources don't tell me a lot, they give me snippets of what happened, they don't give me the build up to it, or the actual plans for the evacuation. I feel that all three sources were useful in their own respective way, because they gave me opinion, fact, and blatant government propaganda to boost morale. They do have their limitations but despite these I still get a few aspects of Dunkirk, the disorganization or as the commander called it "rabble". I would have liked to see more factual statements instead of opiniated ones; it would have been more convincing and reliable, because it could be backed up by statistics. Also a few German and French statements would really have backed up the events and given a more reliable account of the battle of Dunkirk. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for ...

    As well because Thomas Kerr is biased towards the army he may not be telling the full story of what has happened around him to make the navy look better than the army. I don't think that this source is useful for describing the Battle of Dunkirk particularly and I

  2. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    The results of bombing and air fighting were exaggerated, resulting in a Luftwaffe leadership that became increasingly disconnected from reality. This lack of leadership and solid intelligence meant that the Germans did not adopt any consistent strategy, even when the RAF had its back to the wall.

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Therefore, pin-point bombing of radar stations was all but impossible. This was obviously an important change of tactics made by Britain, which would consequently improve Britain's chances of victory. Also, the German fighters were told to fly close together, which made it easier for the British planes of the Royal Air Force to attack them.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    The source tackles the issue of armaments and brings into light the leadership of Sir Douglas Haig; this source indicates that he planned to bomb the Germans into submission. I believe that when he demanded more ammunition it showed his weakness as a General.

  1. Battle of Britain

    Shot down pilots who survived could return to the battle, but German pilots shot down were lost, so although numerically stronger, they were bound to lose more men than the British. From 10th July, the Germans launched daily strikes on the British, but by August, the British were ahead, with the Germans losing 248 fighters to the RAF's 148.

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    Before I looked at the written interpretations, I interviewed an elderly lady who was 23 at the time of the Battle of Britain. She saw and heard many of Churchill's speeches and she commented 'Winston was the perfect priminister to lead Britain'.

  1. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    the radio, or in the newspapers, this was so that everyone all over the country was aware of the myth. The myth kept on being repeated so that the public would believe it. It was important to keep the myth going because it boosted morale and it kept Britain believing

  2. Battle of Britain.

    very heroic, probably wanting more people to get involved with the war, it was certainly very nationalistic in its tone, in order to maintain peoples morale. In terms of its strengths, it's an eyewitness account of what happened. The extract itself is very open and personal, making it an emotional piece; therefore there is no point in lying.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work