• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Dunkirk and the battle of Britain All three of the sources A, B and are useful in their own unique way, but they all have limitations, so they can only describe a small snippet out of the big picture, on how it was like at the battle f Dunkirk on the beaches. Source A seemed useful to me, because it gave me a real idea about the atmosphere and morale, when the British undertook the rescue. The person giving the statement is commander Thomas Kerr, who was one of the naval officers sent to organize the evacuation. Seeing that he is of this rank, he seems that he is trustworthy because as commander he seems trustworthy. I also noted that the statement was a very personal one because the way he spoke about the British side, it would have been censored. ...read more.

Middle

The source is also primary meaning that he actually witnessed it, so perhaps it gives us a realistic idea on how the battle was like. Source B was also useful because analyzing the evidence we had of the battle, it seems that he is giving more of a factual statement than a opinion, making it more believable. This statement is also primary; it was from a seaman manning one of the boats of the minesweeper, Bill Elmslie. So seeing that he was in the middle of this all, it does look like he's trustworthy. I got a firm idea about how it was on the beaches by the way he writes: "I glanced back at the beach and saw a german fighter streak across the sand, his machine guns cutting through those columns of soldiers like reapers through corn", that really paints a realistic picture. ...read more.

Conclusion

If there were French or German accounts to back these up then it would have been more convincing. Also these sources don't tell me a lot, they give me snippets of what happened, they don't give me the build up to it, or the actual plans for the evacuation. I feel that all three sources were useful in their own respective way, because they gave me opinion, fact, and blatant government propaganda to boost morale. They do have their limitations but despite these I still get a few aspects of Dunkirk, the disorganization or as the commander called it "rabble". I would have liked to see more factual statements instead of opiniated ones; it would have been more convincing and reliable, because it could be backed up by statistics. Also a few German and French statements would really have backed up the events and given a more reliable account of the battle of Dunkirk. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    Taylor message is that the battle of Britain was a small event and had little outcome on the war. He is says that the Germans did not take the battle seriously. He also mentions how important Dowding was to the British winning the battle.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    The climax of the Battle of Britain came on the 30th-31st August, 1940. The British lost 50 aircraft compared to the Germany's 41. The RAF were close to defeat however, there was one event and change of tactics that would transpire to alter the whole direction of the conflict, if not the war and greatly aided the British.

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    and capabilities, it was ignored if it did not match perceived wisdom. For much of the battle the Luftwaffe operated 'blind', unaware of their enemy's true strengths, capabilities and deployments. Many times the leadership believed Fighter Command strength had collapsed, while raids against supposed fighter airfields fell instead on bomber or coastal defence installations.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    On paper the battle has clear-cut and achievable aims but the way the Generals orchestrated it, ensured they were not achieved. Source B, an extract from a communication from Haig to Lloyd George (who was at the time Minister of Armaments before he became Prime Minister in December 1918), is a reliable primary source.

  1. Battle of Britain

    The British fighters could stay on the ground until the last minute, so constant patrols were not needed and the Germans lost the element of surprise, which in many ways made up for the lack of numbers on the British side.

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    During the battle a myth began to form, the Luftwaffe was not penetrating the RAF defences. The few, young pilots became heroes as they held of the German bombers for day after day. Propaganda was put up everywhere saying that if it weren't for 'the few' that were fighting a

  1. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    A popular myth emerged about the Battle of Britain during the early stages of the war. The myth was based on 'the few' and their 'finest hour'. 'The few' was a phrase used to describe the British pilots because they were greatly outnumbered by the German pilots.

  2. Battle of Britain.

    very selective, Churchill talks only about the Christian civilisation, not mentioning other religions and nationalities who fought in the battle, i.e., the Jews. He doesn't tell us about the casualties, the damage done by the bombing and the raids and how close Britain was to defeat, (24th Aug-6th Sept).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work