• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Dunkirk and the battle of Britain All three of the sources A, B and are useful in their own unique way, but they all have limitations, so they can only describe a small snippet out of the big picture, on how it was like at the battle f Dunkirk on the beaches. Source A seemed useful to me, because it gave me a real idea about the atmosphere and morale, when the British undertook the rescue. The person giving the statement is commander Thomas Kerr, who was one of the naval officers sent to organize the evacuation. Seeing that he is of this rank, he seems that he is trustworthy because as commander he seems trustworthy. I also noted that the statement was a very personal one because the way he spoke about the British side, it would have been censored. ...read more.

Middle

The source is also primary meaning that he actually witnessed it, so perhaps it gives us a realistic idea on how the battle was like. Source B was also useful because analyzing the evidence we had of the battle, it seems that he is giving more of a factual statement than a opinion, making it more believable. This statement is also primary; it was from a seaman manning one of the boats of the minesweeper, Bill Elmslie. So seeing that he was in the middle of this all, it does look like he's trustworthy. I got a firm idea about how it was on the beaches by the way he writes: "I glanced back at the beach and saw a german fighter streak across the sand, his machine guns cutting through those columns of soldiers like reapers through corn", that really paints a realistic picture. ...read more.

Conclusion

If there were French or German accounts to back these up then it would have been more convincing. Also these sources don't tell me a lot, they give me snippets of what happened, they don't give me the build up to it, or the actual plans for the evacuation. I feel that all three sources were useful in their own respective way, because they gave me opinion, fact, and blatant government propaganda to boost morale. They do have their limitations but despite these I still get a few aspects of Dunkirk, the disorganization or as the commander called it "rabble". I would have liked to see more factual statements instead of opiniated ones; it would have been more convincing and reliable, because it could be backed up by statistics. Also a few German and French statements would really have backed up the events and given a more reliable account of the battle of Dunkirk. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    outcome of the war before deciding were the turning point of the war occurred. He is also able to look at a wide range of information. The weaknesses of his book are that the book is a general history book and is not specific to the war so he may omit a number of facts.

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    The climax of the Battle of Britain came on the 30th-31st August, 1940. The British lost 50 aircraft compared to the Germany's 41. The RAF were close to defeat however, there was one event and change of tactics that would transpire to alter the whole direction of the conflict, if not the war and greatly aided the British.

  1. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    This meant that the Luftwaffe had almost no recent knowledge of the workings of the RAF's air defences: in particular of the crucial command and control system that had been built before the war. Even when good information existed, such as 5th Abteilung's November 1939 assessment of Fighter Command strengths

  2. Battle of Britain

    The Germans were never able to successfully take out Britain's radar chain, and this plays a big part in why they were never able to get the better of fighter command. Another major factor on Britain's side was that they were fighting over friendly territory.

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    large proportion of the German air force, the Nazi's would be on British soil already. People's morale was boosted, and most of the population felt that they owed their lives to these brave pilots that had saved them. Many people still believe that if it wasn't for this vital win

  2. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    In this essay I am going to use several interpretations from the beginning of the Battle of Britain to explain what the popular myth is and why it spread so quickly. This is the first part of my essay; in the second part of my essay I will use several

  1. Battle of Britain.

    very selective, Churchill talks only about the Christian civilisation, not mentioning other religions and nationalities who fought in the battle, i.e., the Jews. He doesn't tell us about the casualties, the damage done by the bombing and the raids and how close Britain was to defeat, (24th Aug-6th Sept).

  2. Source based work on The evacuation at Dunkirk.

    It also shows how people where terrified of being killed. This source is also written in the past tense so we can't tell long after event this was written so we can not be sure how accurate the account is.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work