• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

During the play the audience is aware of a number of changes and developments in the character of John Proctor. What are these changes? How and why do you think Arthur Miller achieves them?

Extracts from this document...


The Crucible- A Character Study During the play the audience is aware of a number of changes and developments in the character of John Proctor. What are these changes? How and why do you think Arthur Miller achieves them? I believe the Crucible to be a political statement expressed by Arthur Miller in 1953, during the American, 'hunt for communism'. His works, 'The Crucible', reflected this with 'the hunt for witches' in 1692. These two time periods clash, with their same fear that their particular 'way of life' was at a certain risk, if communism supporters and devil worshipers (i.e. witches) were not sought out and destroyed. The two identical situations were allowed to get out of hand. Families waged war in the simplest way, by throwing accusations at one another, we wittiness a clear analogy of this in the play. Arthur Miller jeopardised a lot when he wrote the crucible. It was noted as a criticism against The House of UN American Activities Committee. Anybody that posed a threat against the safety of the state was swiftly dealt with. John Proctor, an important character in the play, is a blunt outspoken man who readily gives his opinion on someone or something. For example, his denunciation of Reverend Parris's greed - 'Parris came, and for twenty weeks he preach nothing but golden candle sticks until he had them'. ...read more.


He is an independent man, so this allows him to remain sane, while others panic. Unfortunately, this also restrains him from taking effective action to save his wife, and the rest of the town. It is not until Elizabeth is taken away, that we notice any particular change in Proctor. He gathers up any evidence and anything legal (e.g.: a partition of those who speak good of those charged). Proctor is at first accused of contempt of the court, but the judges, Hathorne and Danforth, give him a fair chance and let him speak. Proctor is gentle; encouraging his witness, Mary Warren, to explain all about the lies and deceit that Abigail has invented. But the girls, (lead of course by Abigail), pretend that Mary's spirit is attacking them so Mary denies everything Proctor has put forwards as evidence. Proctor is attempting to keep calm and uses his knowledge to the best of his ability. He tries every means possible, he pleads with the court, but everything he says or does, Parris insists upon his lying. Exasperated, Proctor sees only one way to save his wife. He must overcome his guilt and shame to testify against the biggest witch of them all, Abigail Williams. To save the community, his personal problems must be dashed aside, his good name included. The court hears of Abigail and Proctor's affair and the ending of the play, is on the brink of this confession. ...read more.


He very subtly changed a piece of Proctor's character every so often. When this occurred, there was usually a change in Proctor's mood or attitude. For example, when Proctor and his wife were together in the house, he was rather nervous, but when she came to be taken away, (after being accused), he was angry and very determined. Proctor changed more than any other character in the play. We figure this is because he has so much to come to terms with. (His wife and himself being accused, Abigail being the cause of it all and the whole town being intent upon self destruction). Arthur Miller changed Proctor so much as he was the secondary character, it was he and Abigail that had caused the majority of this trouble in the first place. Miller wanted to portray Proctor as the character that becomes the hero, the hero that admitted his sins and paid his due for them. The audience's reaction to John Proctor originally, was at first one of mistrust and insecurity at what this man might do or be capable of. During the second act we grow to know him better and we discover just ho deep his character is involved in the crucible. Towards the ending, the audience, surely, no longer feels mistrust or insecurity over this man, but instead respect, honour and bravery at what this man will do to save his wife, friends and of course, his good name. The Crucible - A Character Study 23/03/2004 English Essay Page 5 of 5 Samantha Tibbs ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is John Proctor a good man?

    4 star(s)

    The judges and Hale have almost convinced him to do so, but the last stumbling block is his signature on the confession, which he cannot bring himself to give. In part, this unwillingness reflects his desire not to dishonour his fellow prisoners: he would not be able to live with

  2. The Crucible by Arthur Miller - Abigail Williams - Character Study.

    So Abigail can run wild and will be protected by the man who should be eradicating such behaviour, she must be aware of this fact, as many of her actions would warrant death. Abigail's mordacity is primarily displayed in Act1 as she Mercy and Mary Warren are all in Betty's

  1. Crucible confession

    Proctor is awed by their efficiency shown in his stage directions (with a cold, cold horror at their efficiency). Proctor uses accusations like Danforth, asking why the confession must be written. This is another comparison between Danforth and Proctor but there is a startling difference in what the two characters ask questions for.

  2. How Does Arthur Miller Present The Characters of Abigail and Elizabeth and Shape Our ...

    At the beginning of Act One, Abigail and Proctor accidentally meet when he enters Parris's home. When they are alone, the words they exchange with each other illustrate clearly the structure of their relationship. Miller makes it evident to his audience from the start of this scene that Abigail's feelings for Proctor are much stronger than his feelings for her.

  1. "God in heaven, what is John Proctor? The Crucible by Arthur Miller.

    Reverend Hale found a poppet with a needle in it at the Proctor's house although really it belonged to Mary Warren, the Proctor's servant, who was also in the group of girls led by Abigail. She had put the needle into the poppet for safekeeping.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Two Ministers- Parris and Hale. Consider the Changes in ...

    people's lives-mainly John Proctor's and his wife's, to determine the matter of witchcraft. Indeed, one of is early lines shows just how important he thinks he is. When giving Parris some books on the matter, Parris comments on their heavy weight.

  1. The crucible, God in heaven what is John Proctor?

    When Proctor talks to Parris he is very different, which is very likely to cause trouble for him later. He says to Parris, "You hardly ever mention God anymore." A stage direction reads "There is a shock among the others" which shows that this is a very shocking thing to

  2. Do you consider John Proctor to be a modern tragic hero?

    He is also clearly anguished, for he admits now that through his weakness he has failed his own principles. Proctor believes that his inaction and that of the others are sinful and that God, who he deems the only true judge of a man, will punish them all for it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work