• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysis of Arthur Miller's Presentation of Abigail

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Analyse Arthur Miller's presentation of Abigail Williams in 'The Crucible' Arthur Miller wrote the play "The Crucible" in 1953 which was in the middle of the McCarthy political 'witch-hunt' in America. However the story had appealed to the playwright for many years, therefore 'The Crucible' can be described as a political parable as it was inspired by the decade of McCarthyism. Miller wrote the play set in an area of Massachusetts called Salem in 1692 where some adolescent girls were dabbling with supernatural powers and witchcraft. They were eventually jailed and the jails were filled with men and women accused of witchcraft. Ultimately twenty people ended up hung. The inhabitants of Salem were rigid in their interpretation of the Bible, believing in witches and the Devil. They believed also that the Bible instructed them that witches must be hanged. This relates to the McCarthy trails that were happening in the USA during the 1950s as the trails were about the admission of adherence to communism, consequently witnesses were brought before the committee to name names. This naming approach was very similar to the process of witch trials; Miller then began to relate this to the public confessions as parallel with the naming of names at Salem in 1692. Subsequently Arthur Miller wrote a play in relation to this and uses Abigail to convey similar ideas to the McCarthy Trials in the 1950s. ...read more.

Middle

Consequently people can't accuse her, which because of her selfish behaviour leads her on to accusing Tituba by saying 'She makes me drink blood!' This describes Abigail's destructive nature and the deviousness of Abigail's thinking put into practice. From this I can call Abigail opportunistic as she has seen a way out; she has explored it and taken it. While this is selfish behaviour, it is certainly a very clever move by Abigail to relieve some of the pressure from her and give her a chance to think about what she is going to say next. The audiences' response from this action taken by Abigail is that it is ludicrous that she can accuse somebody and say a few words and make the court believe her. This links in with the McCarthy trials because all the court was interested in was names and they were so desperate for a name that once one was named with a motive they seized it. At the end of Act One after implicating Tituba, Abigail remained quiet. Abigail is silent in this scene which gives her time to carefully listen to the proceedings about Tituba and intelligently use it for her next speech. Therefore she is being clever and cunning by using the available time in which she is not being questioned to be able to think and understand what the other characters are saying and then devise her own speech accordingly. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was mainly due to the short sightedness of the court which had dealt with the witch trials. If somebody was accused of being a witch the verdict of the person would already have been decided, although they would face the court to discover whether they were a witch or not, ultimately they would face a death penalty. However we know witches didn't exist, therefore I refer to the witch trials as a death penalty. To allow this to occur the social conditions of Salem in 1692 included fairly rapid social change, a distrusted outside political authority and new opportunities for betterment which were not evenly distributed throughout the population, caused increased social inequality. The conditions during the 1950s that made McCarthyism possible were at a time of America distrust between capitalism and communism, as communists had gained information on a weapon of mass destruction. McCarthy was the head of the investigation committee investigating the different government departments and they were questioned about the loyalty to their country. Both of these social conditions are comparable to that of each other that allow for such mass hysteria trials. The play still has relevance today in the fact that if there are the correct social conditions then it will occur, however on a smaller and not on such a drastic scale, consequently having no real relevance in the eyes of today's court. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Conan Doyle section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Conan Doyle essays

  1. How Does Arthur Miller Present The Characters of Abigail and Elizabeth and Shape Our ...

    Abigail knows that she was successful in having and powering Proctor's love which is shown in the conversation they shared in Act One where Abigail says 'Aye but we did' in response to Proctor's denial that they never touched and this could have been a trigger into making her think

  2. Character analysis on Abigail (The Crucible)

    She may be the character who drives much of the plot but it is her elders whom we are meant to despise; Parris, Putnam and Danforth. At the start of Act One she is already at the centre of attention, almost from the beginning: when Parris interview her, she is

  1. Look at Miller's presentation of Abigail in 'The Crucible'. How realistic is his presentation ...

    Susanna Walcott is described as being '...a little younger than Abigail; a hurried, nervous girl'. This suggests that she would like to have Abigail's confidence and is drawn to her because she has such a presence and confident air about her.

  2. There is a clear parallel between the events of 1692 in Salem and the ...

    In the trails of 1950 in America Miller himself was called up to face the trials and like Proctor he found the trials 'absurd and ridiculous.' And he also stated " I have never been able to believe in the reality of these people being actual putative traitors any more then I could be."

  1. Examine Miller’s Purposes In His Presentation of Evil In ‘The Crucible’

    The audience's perceptions of evil in 'The Crucible' changes. Originally Parris is seen as a good character: he is a reverend, traditionally seen as a good person. He is discovered "kneeling beside the bed, evidently in prayer." The audience's perceptions of the reverend as a good man change when the narrator says "In history he cut a villainous path,

  2. Arthur Miller states that Abigail Williams is the prime mover in the Salem hysteria. ...

    The author perceptively wrote Abigail's fictional self based on that of a real person, whose identity adds to the depth of the character; a young girl named Abigail Williams, aged 10 in the McCarthy trials was Arthur Millers foundation for the fictional character that was later formed.

  1. An Analysis of the Final Scenes of "Death of a Salesman" by Arthur Miller

    Without his job, this part of Willy, and thus his true dream of respect and real success, takes over. To me, this is what drives him to take his own life. In this scene, I believe that Arthur Miller builds up to the astonishing climax using a number of different methods.

  2. Explain How Arthur Miller Uses Act Three As A Dramatic Device To Expose The ...

    Before the play even started, there was a strong dispute between Reverend Parris and John Proctor. Although the rivalry was a key part of the whole play, it was highlighted in Act Three, as I have already shown. It's the first rivalry to be exposed in this act.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work