• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore the way Wilfred Owen and Sebastian Faulks present the physical and mental suffering of soldiers in the First World War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explore the way Wilfred Owen and Sebastian Faulks present the physical and mental suffering of soldiers in the First World War Both Sebastian Faulks in his novel 'Birdsong' and Wilfred Owen present suffering in soldiers fighting in the First World War in both physical and psychological ways. They present the discomforts that came from everyday living conditions in the trenches, they both present the serious physical injuries produced by the war and the haunting effect this has on them in the short and long term. Both writers present these things in a vivid and poignant style. The living conditions in the trenches were extremely poor, wet weather led to men living in deep mud and contracting 'trench foot'. The soldiers in the trenches would have had to live with constant shellfire; this could result in 'shell shock' where the untiring bombardment had worn away their nerves to the point of insanity. We can see an example of this in 'Birdsong' when Faulks is talking about "the spasmodic explosion of shells". We can see from the use of language here that Faulks relates to the shelling as insanity. As if the "spasmodic explosions" are not only the explosions but also fits of the men themselves. Owen also talks about the effects of 'shelling' in his poetry. ...read more.

Middle

Owen also writes of long-term injuries being sustained but is generally much less graphic and makes the same point in a subtler way. In the poem 'Disabled' Owen describes how a soldier has been so seriously injured that he shall never regain good health: "He's lost his colour very far from here, poured it down shell-holes till the veins ran dry". If Faulks wished to convey the intensity of an injury sustained he'd be more likely to write "he thought of the hole in Douglas's shoulder where he had pressed his hand through almost to the lung". Owen seems to be a more creative and subtle writer whereas Faulks seems more obvious and graphic. This might come about merely because Faulks is writing a novel and Owen poetry. Owen might have to be more creative to convey the same meaning in fewer words. Poetry being a condensed emotional form of language. He uses metaphors and similes to help us understand without explaining every detail. However Faulks does not have to be as creative and isn't as he wrote a five hundred and three page novel. To live under the extreme circumstances that the soldiers do both writers explain that the soldiers build up psychological defences. The ability is grown to numb their emotions and adapt so as to be able to cope with seeing the death of men everyday, some of which were friends. ...read more.

Conclusion

We become intimately acquainted with him. However, his death is presented suddenly and completely without compassion; "A snipers bullet entered his head above the eye causing trails of his brain to loop out onto the sandbags of the parados behind him" Owen presents death romantically trying to provoke sympathetic feelings. "Move him into the sun-, gently its touch awoke him once, At home, whispering of fields unsown"(Futility). Owens' language coveys a sense of emotional turmoil. By his use of words like 'gentle' he emphasises his emotional sympathy for this man's death, making the body have a sense of fragility. Owen refers to "home" to heighten the emotional significance and sadness in order to convey the significance of his death. In conclusion, it is my opinion that Wilfred Owen and Sebastian Faulks write quite differently about the suffering of soldiers in the First World War. Owen seems to write more poetically and spiritually. This could be because he knew the people who dyed or were mutilated and so was more sensitive around the subject. Also he was writing poetry so he would have had to convey more sentiment or information in a smaller amount of text. Owen could have been more sentimental because of the closed-off position he was in. Whereas Faulks wrote retrospectively, knowing what happened throughout the war. He wrote more objectively and less personally. Faulks could not relate in the same way and so tends to write more obviously and graphically. Words:1812 1 Hereward Campbell-Anderson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Wilfred Owen section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Wilfred Owen essays

  1. How is War Presented in Three WW1 Poems of Your Choice? Dulce Et Decorum ...

    The Latin words told by the Roman poet Horace, enhance the focal points of the poem, which is effective as the events in the poem quite clearly contradict the saying. There is some irony in this concluding stanza, yet Owen is also very serious.

  2. A Comparison between Dulce et decorum est. by Wilfred Owens, and Refugee Blues by ...

    This shows how, ironically how the only person who thought about or cares for the Jews is in fact, Hitler, whose main ambition is to exterminate them entirely. The long period of time in which 'Refugee Blues' is written contrasts the shorter ones witnessed in 'Dulce et decorum est'.

  1. Dickinson's BECAUSE I COULD NOT STOP FOR DEATH

    For the word fate here is simply the translation into dramatic terms of the dictionary definition of the words old maid, a classeme, a type of designation, a term of semantic typology: Rose Cormon is pitiable as a victim of entrapment in a class, as much as she is comical.

  2. Comparison of Owen and Sassoon

    The reader is made to feel the grief of this poem together with the dead soldiers mourning families. When we think of the word anthem we think of the national anthem honouring queen and country, a song of pride. However, this is not the case.

  1. Assassin - creative writing.

    He had given him everything; knowledge, skill and most importantly love. There was movement in the trees; the assassin immediately without thought leapt down and landed on his feet. A guard was patrolling carrying information. The guard's eyes opened with horror, struck by fear all he could say was "You!!"

  2. Compare and contrast the ways in which writers present their attitudes to the First ...

    The poet uses repetition of the word 'Who' in the majority of the lines, almost accusingly. The whole poem excluding the last stanza is made out of rhetorical questions, including the title 'Who's for The Game?' This would make the reader feel as if the poet was talking directly to him, and that he should answer.

  1. Compare the ways in which the poets memorably describe soldiers going off to war ...

    procession - "Blithely they go as to a wedding day, The mothers' sons" - the emphasis on mother here, particularly as the four syllables of that line dramatically change the metre, reminds the reader that each of them belongs to someone, thus making it even more tragic.

  2. Wilfred Owen and Jesse Pope (Dulce Et Decorum Est VS Who's For the ...

    It was written by Wilfred Owen, and is based on one of his own fatal experiences in war. The title "Dulce Et Decorum Est" is in Latin and means 'sweet and proper' in English. The poem explains how the soldiers were attacked by shells of poisonous gas while they were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work