• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore the way Wilfred Owen and Sebastian Faulks present the physical and mental suffering of soldiers in the First World War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explore the way Wilfred Owen and Sebastian Faulks present the physical and mental suffering of soldiers in the First World War Both Sebastian Faulks in his novel 'Birdsong' and Wilfred Owen present suffering in soldiers fighting in the First World War in both physical and psychological ways. They present the discomforts that came from everyday living conditions in the trenches, they both present the serious physical injuries produced by the war and the haunting effect this has on them in the short and long term. Both writers present these things in a vivid and poignant style. The living conditions in the trenches were extremely poor, wet weather led to men living in deep mud and contracting 'trench foot'. The soldiers in the trenches would have had to live with constant shellfire; this could result in 'shell shock' where the untiring bombardment had worn away their nerves to the point of insanity. We can see an example of this in 'Birdsong' when Faulks is talking about "the spasmodic explosion of shells". We can see from the use of language here that Faulks relates to the shelling as insanity. As if the "spasmodic explosions" are not only the explosions but also fits of the men themselves. Owen also talks about the effects of 'shelling' in his poetry. ...read more.

Middle

Owen also writes of long-term injuries being sustained but is generally much less graphic and makes the same point in a subtler way. In the poem 'Disabled' Owen describes how a soldier has been so seriously injured that he shall never regain good health: "He's lost his colour very far from here, poured it down shell-holes till the veins ran dry". If Faulks wished to convey the intensity of an injury sustained he'd be more likely to write "he thought of the hole in Douglas's shoulder where he had pressed his hand through almost to the lung". Owen seems to be a more creative and subtle writer whereas Faulks seems more obvious and graphic. This might come about merely because Faulks is writing a novel and Owen poetry. Owen might have to be more creative to convey the same meaning in fewer words. Poetry being a condensed emotional form of language. He uses metaphors and similes to help us understand without explaining every detail. However Faulks does not have to be as creative and isn't as he wrote a five hundred and three page novel. To live under the extreme circumstances that the soldiers do both writers explain that the soldiers build up psychological defences. The ability is grown to numb their emotions and adapt so as to be able to cope with seeing the death of men everyday, some of which were friends. ...read more.

Conclusion

We become intimately acquainted with him. However, his death is presented suddenly and completely without compassion; "A snipers bullet entered his head above the eye causing trails of his brain to loop out onto the sandbags of the parados behind him" Owen presents death romantically trying to provoke sympathetic feelings. "Move him into the sun-, gently its touch awoke him once, At home, whispering of fields unsown"(Futility). Owens' language coveys a sense of emotional turmoil. By his use of words like 'gentle' he emphasises his emotional sympathy for this man's death, making the body have a sense of fragility. Owen refers to "home" to heighten the emotional significance and sadness in order to convey the significance of his death. In conclusion, it is my opinion that Wilfred Owen and Sebastian Faulks write quite differently about the suffering of soldiers in the First World War. Owen seems to write more poetically and spiritually. This could be because he knew the people who dyed or were mutilated and so was more sensitive around the subject. Also he was writing poetry so he would have had to convey more sentiment or information in a smaller amount of text. Owen could have been more sentimental because of the closed-off position he was in. Whereas Faulks wrote retrospectively, knowing what happened throughout the war. He wrote more objectively and less personally. Faulks could not relate in the same way and so tends to write more obviously and graphically. Words:1812 1 Hereward Campbell-Anderson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Wilfred Owen section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Wilfred Owen essays

  1. Commentary on "Mental Cases" by Wilfred Owen.

    The stanza ends with another questioning yet again who these 'hellish' men are. The opening line of the second stanza provides an unsatisfactory answer, merely describing the men again. This time, however, he specifies why they are in such a state of depression.

  2. How is War Presented in Three WW1 Poems of Your Choice? Dulce Et Decorum ...

    and describes the consequences of war as virtuous, which glorifies war: 'And think, this heart, all evil shed away.' This line is an example of the second most prominent theme employed by Brooke, which is the notion of transformation, distinguished clearly throughout 'The Soldier.'

  1. The changing tradition of war poetry

    The poem has a rhyme, where each other line rhymes, all the stanzas are quite long expect for the third stanza which is only two lines long. In this stanza Owen write about the gas attack, that's why it is short compared to the rest of the stanzas.

  2. Dickinson's BECAUSE I COULD NOT STOP FOR DEATH

    that Balzac, having to choose between drama and sitcom, selected the latter (he kept the drama for his Cousine Bette, where enforced virginity makes his heroine into an evil schemer)? Whereas a historical approach to the humanities has to certify that Balzac's painting of society is true to its model

  1. Comparison of Owen and Sassoon

    even "drunk" not from alcohol but from the fighting which is pitiful language that is intended to reveal the reality of war. The pace of the poem is slow, as we can imagine these exhausted men lumbering through the mud.

  2. Comparison between Break of day in the trenches and Dulce et Decorum est

    He is rejecting the accepted attitude back at home that serving your country in war is glorious. He is critical of the 'high zest', or great enthusiasm, used to convince men to go to war. He sees war as brutal and wasteful of young lives.

  1. Wilfred Owen and Jesse Pope (Dulce Et Decorum Est VS Who's For the ...

    The word "pace" indicates that the soldiers are back on their slow march. The dead man is attributed to be like an inanimate object because he is "flung" into the wagon. A gruesome image is created with the phrase "white eyes writhing". This phrase is also an example of personification.

  2. Comparing the two poems Refugee Blues by W H Auden and Disabled by Wilfred ...

    The structure of the text is carried on through the use of contrasting pictures, the mansion of the holes, expressing the gap between normal people rich people and Jews. The language which is being used is informal while the tone is sad and melancholic.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work