• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast 'To His Coy Mistress' by Andrew Marvell and 'Sonnet 116' by William Shakespeare.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and Contrast 'To His Coy Mistress' by Andrew Marvell and 'Sonnet 116' by William Shakespeare. In this assignment I will compare and contrast two poems To His Coy Mistress written by Andrew Marvell in 1650 and Sonnet 116 by William Shakespeare written in 1590. Both on the theme of love and time and both written to be sent to an unknown recipient. Neither of these two poems were intended to be published. The first major difference between the two poems would be that the structure is noticeably different. Marvell attempts syllogism by dividing his poem into a three-part argument. However, experts say Marvell has not succeeded in this technique. Stanza one talks about how if they had all the time in the world they would be able to take their time and not have to rush to be together. Part two of the poem is written to shock and remind the recipient that one day she will die and then it will be too late. The third and final stanza is written to encourage her to be active and agree with what she is saying. ...read more.

Middle

As there is a distinct change between stanzas in Andrew Marvell's poem, William Shakespeare's tone is one of consistence. It is also shown that Shakespeare believes strongly in this issue as he does not change his mind about love and keeps to a confident, positive tone throughout. Another similarity between both poems is that each poet uses vivid, clear and effective imagery that the Edwardian audience would have been familiar with. Andrew Marvell uses unconventional imagery which is appropriate to the purpose of each section. In stanza one, where the tone is one of relaxation, Marvell compares his love to a slow growing vegetable. "My vegetable love should grow vaster than empires and more slow" Here Marvell is comparing his love to a vegetable, something which is small and slow growing, yet still waiting to be picked; to an empire which is something pictured to be vast and amazing yet also takes a long time to be built up. This works well as you would not usually expect something as special as love to be compared to an everyday object such as a vegetable. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is an ever- fixed mark that looks on tempests and is never shaken; It is the star to every wandering bark" An ever-fixed mark could refer to several things. Such as a lighthouse that used to guide the lost ships. It could also refer to the pole star. This is also something the audience could relate to as shipping was one of the ways of transport in those days. Stars were also used for navigation at sea this was known as celestial navigation. The star or lighthouse to a lost ship would be a fixed mark which can be relied upon for guidance. In comparison to love, Shakespeare is saying love is something that you can always rely on to guide you back. In conclusion there are a number of similarities and differences between the two poems although they were written sixty years apart by completely different poets. Despite this Marvell and Shakespeare proceed to use the same theme and express their view using effective imagery linked to the subject matter. An obvious difference would be that one poet writes to a close form were there are restrictions to the way the poem is written. However Marvell writes to an open form were there are no restrictions to the way the poet has to write. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Andrew Marvell section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Andrew Marvell essays

  1. Compare 'To His Coy Mistress' by Andrew Marvell with 'To His Mistress Going to ...

    Marvell uses a lot of references to time. Also Marvell uses the idea that she should make the most of her life while she was alive as she never knows when it will end. This is Carp Diem (seize the day) another of the poets ideas. I don't think that Donne felt compelled to use so many of this kind, concepts.

  2. A Comparison of how "To His Coy Mistress" and "The Flea" Present and Develop ...

    However you can guess that because the persona describes her as coy, she is perhaps stubborn and plays hard to get, apart from that you don't find anything else out about her and because she isn't given a voice in the poem you never find out her views only his.

  1. Compare and contrast To His Coy Mistress and John Donnes The Flea and consider ...

    This tells us that the thinks that's sex is important and that it would be unacceptable for her to kill the flea, and that it would kill him and the idea of what the flea is. The use of the words "kill me" shows that he will be emotionally compromised

  2. Comparing To his Coy Mistress and Sonnet 130

    The last two lines are different from the rest of the poem being rhyming couplets and consequently they stand out, giving an opportune chance to emphasize a point. Shakespeare uses this to emphasize his love for his mistress and therefore also to emphasize the positive aspect of the poem (genuine nature of his love)

  1. How do Donne's sonnets differ from Shakespeare's sonnets? In your answer, you should discuss ...

    that for as long as the sonnet is read, it "gives life to thee (his lover)"

  2. A comparison of The Chimney Sweeper by William Blake & Charlotte O(TM) Neil(TM)s Song ...

    Farrell also like Blake uses repeated words in the poem but to force the readers to feel Charlotte O' Neil's anger, as well as that this Technique also creates rhythm in the poem. In the middle of the poem the tone changes and becomes more sneering.

  1. Compare and contrast 'Cousin Kate' and 'The Seduction'.

    Despite being emotionally hurt, and wanting her innocence back, she breaks the heels of her shoes by herself "(as she flung them at the wall)." Her aggressiveness is making her cheat herself without understanding; by trying to destroy objects which remind her of her past, she is destroying her objects of innocence - it is an inevitable paradox.

  2. Compare and contrast the presentation of seduction in Marvells" To his Coy Mistress" ...

    Firstly, the speaker refers to time?s ? winged chariot? hurrying near. This metaphor suggest that time is running out as life expectancy in the 1700?s was only 35 years. The classical Greek Mythology is explored where Helios who was the God of the sun dwelt in a golden palace located

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work