Conclusion analysis
Good conclusions usually refer back to the question or title and address it directly - for example by using key words from the title.
How well do you think these conclusions address the title or question? Answering these questions should help you find out.
- Do they use key words from the title or question?
- Do they answer the question directly?
- Can you work out the question or title just by reading the conclusion?
-
Describe and discuss the following two poems from the course reader: 'When I Have Fears' by John Keats and 'A Minor Bird' by Robert Frost.
"In conclusion after comparing both of these poems, looking at their formal, structural and linguistic elements, and their thematic contents, I feel that 'When I Have Fears' by John Keats is the more effective poem. I think that this is because the poet, Keats, gets the reader of the poem to look more deeply at the meaning. It is written in the 19th century, and in a more traditional style, and although it is written in the English language, Keats uses some words that are either no longer used today or their meanings have changed since being written. This seems to get the reader of the poem to work harder to un ravel its meaning, where as 'A Minor Bird' was written in the 20th Century and is there fore a more modern styled poem. I think that this is reflected through out the whole poem, it is easier on the eye to read because of the way it is set out on the page, and there seems to be no deep hidden meanings that the poet wants the reader to de-mystify. Because of the rhyme scheme and the way it is set out 'A Minor Bird' seems to me to be almost like a child's nursery rhyme."
-
Compare and contrast the odes we have studied to show the range of subjects covered
"I found, that the Keats' poems were written in a romantic style, being both very majestic and full of his imagination. In 'Ode to a Nightingale' as he cannot see the ground around him, he imagines it using his other senses. In 'Ode on a Grecian Urn', Keats imagines what the people on the urn were doing when the picture was painted. He reflects on the idea of a thing of beauty living on past his lifetime and he rejoices in the fact that the urn will never change. The people on the urn are frozen in a moment of time forever. This idea is mirrored in 'Ode to a Nightingale', since all nightingales sing the same song, he imagines the other people who have sat, like him and listened to the bird's song, using the idea that the song of the nightingale transcends time. In this way, we see a comparative theme running through Keats' work. This does not include 'To Autumn', which is a much more 'subjective' poem. When compared to 'Ode to a Nightingale' and 'Ode on a Grecian urn', 'To Autumn' seems to be written in a style that is much more narrative, describing the events of autumn.
Classical"
-
Compare 'La Belle Dame Sans Merci' and 'To Autumn' by John Keats. Write about the verse from, ideas, structure and language of the poems which do you prefer and why?
"In conclusion 'La Belle Dame Sans Merci' has all the characteristics of a ballad. It tells a story with a tragic theme and has short verses with a regular rhyme scheme. 'To Autumn' has no narrative but concentrates on rich imagery to describe the season. It has three long verses with a complex rhyme scheme. It is an ode.
The ballad uses repetition-contrasting atmosphere and contains elements of the supernatural. The ode has none of these. The ballad is written as a dialogue whereas the ode has only the voice of the poet.
Both poems contain rich imagery and sensory appeal but 'To Autumn' does this to a greater degree. Death plays a part in both poems but there is only a hint of death in the title.
The poem I prefer is 'La Belle Dame Sans Merci.' 'La Belle Dame Sans Merci' tells a story; this made the poem more interesting for me as it kept me reading to find out what happened to the knight. 'To Autumn' describes the autumn, for me the poem is not appealing and it did not keep me interested.
By Lee Baldwin"