• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the methods used by Shelley to present the relationship between the Creature and Victor, the creator

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate the methods used by Shelley to present the relationship between the Creature and Victor, the creator Shelley uses a cornucopia of different methods in order to present the intricate relationship between the creature and Victor. The scenery and how the creature and Victor interact with it as well as there descriptions of each other is vital in the affective evaluation of there relationship as this will be a part of the evaluation of Shelley's methods used to present their feelings of each other. They meet in the mountains where they both seek solace and refuge from the torment that plague them, but on the surface, Victor and his creature seem drastically different, but ultimately there is a vast similarity between the pair. They both enjoy the birds, the calm of the wide open spaces, the sound of the water and the clear, crisp mountain air, however it is contrasted in the portrayal of nature being represented as brutal and fragile (much like the creature), "the abrupt side of the mountains" Victor takes great comfort in the beauty of nature, it "subdued and tranquillised" his grief. ...read more.

Middle

Formerly a mysterious, completely physical being, the creature now becomes a verbal, emotional, sensitive, almost human figure that communicates his past to Victor in moving terms. This transformation is key to Victor's bigger understanding of his act of creation; before, it was the creature's physical strength and apparent ill will that made him such a threat, however now it is his intelligence. Victor who is portrayed as God judges the creature causing him to feel unworthy, "grant me thy compassion".This chapter relates both Victor and the creature as they are both beautiful ("I was quickly reassured by the cold gale of the mountains") in some way in there own eyes but on the other hand they are both seen as ugly ("dreary glaciers") , this binary opposition adds to the relationship of Victor and the creature as they are in such a beautiful place. The reference of Victor as "God" and the creature as a "daemon" allows us to look into the use of Paradise Lost. ...read more.

Conclusion

For Victor, it is his guilt and the pain he suffers for bringing upon his family the suffering that comes from the loss of loved ones. William's death and the loss of Justine are indirectly Victor's fault. Through his selfish ambition, he chose to create and abandon his creature without any thought of the consequences. This is considered a crime against nature, and certainly not in keeping with Shelley's ideal parent/child relationship. For Victor nature is peaceful and beautiful, which his current life is not, this is ironic as this contrasts with the very unnatural creature that victor has created. By comparing Victor to God, the creature removes responsibility for his evil actions upon Victor, condoning him for his neglectful failure to provide a nourishing environment. The creature is driven to the calm of the mountains because of the cruelty of mankind. The creature is hideous, and he is rashly judged by his outward appearance rather than his inner beauty. Everywhere he goes he is met with violence and irrational behaviour based on his appearance. It is unfair and unjust, and the reader completely relates to and feels for this rejected "person", "How dare you sport thus with life". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

****
This is a good answer to a difficult question. The essay remains focused on the question and chooses to deal with setting and religion. The religious part of the question is an immense topic and explains why the writer became swamped. More careful structuring, more quotes, contextual information and language analysis would improve this essay.

Marked by teacher Katie Dixon 29/05/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare the two books Frankenstein and Jurassic Park and pay particular attention to the ...

    4 star(s)

    But one of the parks employees is paid to sabotage the project. The story then changes into a escape story for those remaining people on the island as all the dinosaurs have been freed as part of the sabotage and they need to get off the island.

  2. Peer reviewed

    How does Shelley present the idea of Monsters and Monstrosity in Frankenstein?

    5 star(s)

    did not prevent the attacks, despite thinking he was a functioning human, until told otherwise. This leads to another point that despite being attacked, the creature never retaliates, 'I could have torn him limb from limb, like a lion rends the antelope.'

  1. Compare and Contrast "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley and "Flowers For Algernon" by Daniel Keyes, ...

    After the operation Charlie is often referred to as a "study" or as "part of a scientific presentation", the doctors mean no harm when they approach Charlie in this objective manner, as an aloof attitude comes with their job, however Charlie is affected by their actions.

  2. Frankenstein's Creature: Monster or Victim

    Mary Shelley also describes his arrogance; 'A new species would bless me as its creator and source'. Victor implies that his creation would treat him like god. Mary Shelley includes this because it gives another, more evil, motive to create the creature.

  1. Frankenstein is full of ideas and warnings, which are relevant to a modern day ...

    the family meet the monster and see how horrendous his face is. It says that Felix 'dashed me to the ground, and struck me violently with a stick'. This shows people use looks and personality to reflect how they are.

  2. Discuss the nature of monsters in Frankenstein and Beowulf.

    It is just his fate. "Why are you not angry at the peasant who tried to kill me....... Instead you think of them as good people, but me as evil. Is that fair? Is that right?" (page 126) This is very human and not how monsters are supposed to feel.

  1. In what way does Mary Shelley make the reader sympathise with Victor frankenstein's creation?

    However she tells the story from his perspective and over stresses his illness to counterpoint this. Victor has been working for a long time on bringing his creation to life which he emphasises through his language. For instance "toil" this suggests endless hard labour, or to work extremely hard or incessantly.

  2. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley - Critique of Society for Causing the Creture's Actions

    Readers are able to understand the irony that the creature labelled as a monster is disgusted with the actions of mankind. Society has the most influence in a person's point of view on a given point. Mostly society causes misconceptions about people based on appearance and the unknown.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work