Examine/Analyse the character of Macbeth. Is he a tyrant or a tragic hero?

Authors Avatar
Shakespeare:

Examine/Analyse the character of Macbeth. Is he a tyrant or a tragic hero?

It should include:

* The use of language, structure and presentation

* The play's moral and philosophical context

* The play's social and historical setting

Before discussing the character of Macbeth, it is essential that the above question is fully understood. Is Macbeth a tyrant or a tragic hero? The dictionary defines both of these terms as such:

* Tyrant - an oppressive or cruel ruler, or one who forces his will on others cruelly and arbitrarily

* Tragic Hero - a person who evokes both our sympathy and terror, or one who has suffered, struggled, and then ultimately realises that everything was his own fault.

It is obvious to the reader that Macbeth does not specifically fit into either category, as his character contains aspects of both traits. Although he is mainly tyrannical, many subtle hints of a tragic hero can be found in him - such as when he loses the support of those once close to him, due to his arbitrary acts of malicious brutality. Most will believe that he deserves this punishment, but Shakespeare has made Macbeth naïve to the loss of support, which makes the reader more sympathetic towards his character. However, this feeling quickly diminishes as Macbeth continues his flagitious search for a feeling of security, which he does, in fact, never find.

To be able to completely comprehend the character of Macbeth, and, therefore, be able to give a better analysis of him, the historical setting of the play must also be considered, as this will give an insight as to why the play was written, and what purpose Macbeth's character serves.

Shakespeare's 'Macbeth' was loosely based upon historical facts, with the addition of the supernatural theme for the benefit of James I of England/James VI of Scotland, who was the King at the time that the play was written. He showed a great interest in this subject, and witchcraft especially - which explains the inclusion of the witches in the play. Although primarily written in for James, the Elizabethan people were also quite susceptible to the idea of the supernatural, as they were in an age of great confusion and unrest. There were numerous new discoveries that caused them to feel insecure, and they craved a feeling of stability, hence the Chain of Being. This was a belief that the universe has a specific order - everything in its place. Every aspect of creation was included in this ordered system of hierarchy, and any inexplicable anomalies were put into the category of the supernatural.

The supernatural represented all that the Elizabethans hated and feared (mainly because they did not understand it), so although Macbeth is praised at the beginning of the play, by people such as the Captain:

"For brave Macbeth - well he deserves that name"

and even Duncan himself:

"O valiant cousin, worthy gentleman!"

the audience is aware that Macbeth is not all that he appears to be, for his association with the witches is all too apparent. He is first mentioned by the witches in Act 1 Scene 1, he is first seen with them in Act 1 Scene 3, and the first words that he utters, is an echo of their own:

"So foul and fair a day I have not seen" - Macbeth

"Fair is foul, and foul is fair" - Witches

This talking in paradox, shows a sinister connection between the two parties, and undermines and contradicts all the positive aspects previously mentioned. It also gives us an insight into the play, suggesting that Macbeth will become as both abhorred and terrorising as the witches are.

When examining Macbeth's character, and his growth of evil throughout the play, one cannot help but wonder whether he would have become such a totalitarian, so relentless in his efforts to become King, had he not met the witches and heard their prophecies:

"All hail Macbeth, hail to thee, Thane of Glamis!"

"All hail Macbeth, hail to thee, Thane of Cawdor!"

"All hail Macbeth, that shalt be King hereafter!"

He is rather taken aback with these forecasts, and is indecisive as to how to handle the situation. He is both reluctant, and eager, to believe the witches; reluctant because he does not accept that he will ever become King - that is not how it is meant to be - the natural order intends one of Duncan's sons to become King, as that is God's will; but the thought of becoming King excites him greatly, and when he is made Thane of Cawdor he determines:

"Glamis, and Thane of Cawdor.

The greatest is behind."

Rather than except the honour of being named Thane of Cawdor, his thoughts revert back to the prophecies - if the first two can become materialistic, then why not the third also?

Banquo acts as Macbeth's alter ego in this part of the play. When he first hears of the prophecies, he is eager to know what good fortune awaits him:

"Lesser than Macbeth, and greater"

"Now so happy, yet happier"

"Thou shalt get kings, though thou be none."

(This antithesis is a form of trademark of the witches, alongside the talking in rhyming couplets, though this is also used to indicate the end of an Act.)
Join now!


His reaction to the prophecies is more disdainful, because of their ambiguity. He is unable to immediately latch onto them as possible truths, and in true human fashion because he couldn't see it, he questioned its existence. Then, when the witches disappear, he questions the stability of his mind, wondering whether he has gone mad.

Macbeth's prophecies are quite specific, and he is more susceptible to them because of this. Also, being named the Thane of Cawdor soon after it was prophesied, makes him believe that the idea of becoming King, is not as far-fetched as once ...

This is a preview of the whole essay