• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine how two different directors have portrayed Shakespeare's "Romeo & Juliet". Which is the most faithful to Shakespeare's original?

Extracts from this document...


Romeo & Juliet Course-work Examine how two different directors have portrayed Shakespeare's "Romeo & Juliet". Which is the most faithful to Shakespeare's original? Criteria: * Show insight about characters and action, language, ideas and themes, context and setting. * Analysis of techniques used to convey meaning. * Responses are supported by references (quotes) Introduction In this essay, I am going to analyse some scenes in Romeo and Juliet. I am going to compare two versions of Romeo and Juliet, one by Franco Zeffirelli in 1968 and the other by Baz Luhrmann in 1996 and conclude/say how I think Shakespeare would have presented his original. These two productions were made a long time apart and hundreds of years after Shakespeare's production, so neither could be one hundred percent faithful to Shakespeare, but they were both very popular. Zeffirelli went for the traditional method and tried to make his production as similar to Shakespeare's as possible but made the film on a larger and more extravagant scale to please the audience at the time. Luhrmann's version of Romeo and Juliet is a very contemporary film aimed purely at today's audience but still with the same dialogue which keeps the originality. This is also similar to Shakespeare but in a different way to Zeffirelli. Its techniques are similar to Shakespeare's as Shakespeare used all the resources available at the time. ...read more.


Shakespeare does this with the bawdy banter between Sampson and Gregory when we first enter the scene. This banter leads to the opening conflict in which the main symbol of hate, Tybalt, is first introduced. This scene demands a lot of attention as movement, sound and dialogue are all very important here. Zeffirelli uses the same methods as Shakespeare used in this scene with the Shakespearean dialogue, setting and clothes. He concentrates (in) on the scale of the conflict and spreads the fight (all) throughout the town keeping it very extravagant. As the scene ends with the entrance of the Prince and the declaration from him, you feel that it does not have a big impact and therefore the foresight from the Prince that Romeo will be banished which will lead to his and Juliet's death is lost. Zeffirelli does not concentrate on Tybalt as one of the main characters in this scene. Luhrmann uses the same method as Shakespeare here, concentrating on grabbing the audience's attention but he grabs the attention of his contemporary audience in the way people now want to see it. The other characters are introduced in the petrol station that could represent the market square or the confined area of the stage. Luhrmann really gets the point across of Tybalt representing hate but also being very religious. ...read more.


Throughout the scene, Tybalt and Mercutio fight in a semi-comical manner. You can feel the tension gradually building and know that something is going to happen. When Tybalt stabs Mercutio, Tybalt has a real look of terror on his face which is what Shakespeare tried to achieve. The tension only really spills over when Romeo avenges Mercutio. Zeffirelli uses an action-packed scene to show the impact in Verona in full (plain) view of all the people in the town. Therefore Romeo has gone against the Prince's declaration and so Romeo will undoubtedly be banished. Luhrmann nods towards the original context by using a stage for the main action which reminds you that this was originally shown by Shakespeare. There is a very strong feeling of hatred and danger, especially around Mercutio which shies away from what Shakespeare was trying to achieve. A lot of the dialogue is cut to keep the interest and there are a lot more actions. To keep the scene original and make the words fit, Luhrmann discards the guns as the main weapon and uses the broken mirror to cut Mercutio. Shakespeare's audience would have appreciated the dialogue much more and therefore would have preferred Zeffirelli's version. At the end of this scene, we know that Romeo will be banished and therefore you know that Romeo and Juliet's fate is sealed and their getting together is impossible. ?? ?? ?? ?? Romeo & Juliet Coursework 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Romeo and Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Romeo and Juliet essays

  1. Was Shakespeare a good dramatist?

    Although the next part of the scene involves Romeo and Benvolio, it is not taken away from the subject of the Capulets, for a servant who is standing nearby the two men, invites them to an open house Capulet party that night.

  2. Compare and contrast the two 'Romeo and Juliet' films,by Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann. ...

    The fight scene in the modern interpretation is intended for younger audiences and therefore that is probably why it is a lot more drawn out and exaggerated. The scene is very intense; there is a lot of blood and violence. The music is very dramatic and it helps build tension.

  1. Comparing two versions of Romeo & Juliet (Zefferelli and Baz Luhram).

    Also, in the play there is another level of interpretation. Love is triumphant over death, time, fate and especially hatred. Now the families can look back and wonder how the beautiful and innocent love between Romeo and Juliet turned into a horrible disaster because of ancient hatred.

  2. How effectively do Baz Luhrmann and Franco Zeffirelli interpret Act I Scene VI when ...

    Also the language that is used is very religious and is hard to understand in modern time, this makes everything seem less real for our times. When Tybalt sees Romeo and the rest of the Montague's at the party the main feeling that he shows is anger, as soon as he sees Romeo he asks for his rapier.

  1. How does Baz Luhrmann use film techniques to make Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" more ...

    Lord and Lady Capulet were the perfect characters to dress as Anthony and Cleopatra allowing those more educated on the works of Shakespeare to realize this resemblance, hinting at their characters and the eventual deaths to occur at the end of this tragedy.

  2. Choose two scenes from "Romeo and Juliet" and comment on how Zeffirelli and Luhrmann ...

    This draws attention to the negative aspects of the scene, which go unnoticed in many other versions of the play as it is widely regarded as purely a love scene. Another way in which Luhrmann interprets this scene as his own is through the art of visual metaphor, for example props, costume and depictions of the natural elements.

  1. How successful is Baz Luhrmann's adaptation of Romeo and Juliet in Representing William Shakespeare's ...

    Her portrait is featured on their guns, along side Jesus on a few of their bullet proof under garments symbolising they believe that they are protected by their religion. A heart belted with flowers, with sun raise descending from it and protruding fire symbolises burning love and passion.

  2. Examine how different directors have portrayed Shakespeare's "Romeo And Juliet" which stays most faithful ...

    This could be for a number of reasons; the actors could not of been as experienced as the actors chosen for Baz Luhrman's version such as Leonardo De Caprio, who is a very experienced actor who has worked in such films as Titanic a box office hit in 1997, and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work