• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how as a director, you would present the speeches of Brutus and Anthony (Act III Scene II), so as to engage and influence the audience.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how as a director, you would present the speeches of Brutus and Anthony (Act III Scene II), so as to engage and influence the audience This scene is one of the highlights of the play "Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare. It follows the climax of Caesar's death, and a great amount of tension builds up as the audience waits to find out if the conspirators, led by Brutus, succeed in their cause, or if they are punished for their crime. The main threat to the conspirators after Caesar's death is Anthony, a very loyal friend of Caesar's. Previously in the play, we have not heard much about Anthony, and this scene introduces Anthony's character. As a director, I must emphasise his actions to show his personality clearly to the audience. The story of Julius Caesar is very well known, so to keep the audience interested in the play can be quite hard to achieve. Although the storyline cannot be changed, there are other aspects of the play which are open to interpretation, such as the personalities of the characters. Before discussing the presentation of the speeches, I must analyse the characters' personalities. When considering Brutus, I first thought that having taken part in the conspiracy and killed Caesar, he would be nervous and frightened of how the citizens and Caesar's friends might react, and would plan carefully on how to keep himself safe. His fear might also have diminished his belief in his actions. ...read more.

Middle

die, but the crowd in the play is a gathering of rough peasants, so for them to remain silent would not seem realistic. Therefore, there should exclamations of shock, but would soon settle as they realise the reason behind the conspiracy. Brutus then repeats his previous statements to reinforce his argument and to give the crowd time to think. This time, however, he should say the words, "honour, for his valour; and death for his ambition." in a much more strict, harsh way, because having explained it to the crowd, he can now be much more critical of Caesar. To completely turn the crowd in his favour, Brutus follows his statements with a series of rhetorical questions, "Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? ...Who is here so vile that will not love his country?" He should ask these questions confidently, with passion, and should not give the citizens much time to think about them, so the citizens will go with the easy option of agreeing with Brutus again. Having gained the crowd's support, Brutus even vows to give his life, "I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please my country to need my death." The purpose of Brutus' speech was to make the Roman citizens realise Caesar's faults, that Caesar was incapable of becoming a good leader. By doing this, Brutus clears himself and the other conspirators of the crime. But Brutus stressed on his defence too much, and made himself seem too "honourable", so the crowd's reaction to his speech was, "Let him be Caesar." ...read more.

Conclusion

The hardest part of persuading people is how to state your intentions while convincing people that it is definitely the right thing to do. Brutus achieved this by stating that if Caesar was left in power, then the citizens would be turned into slaves. The rest of his speech was based on this assumption-he cleverly made the people believe in his cause without giving a clear reason apart from stating that Caesar was ambitious. If the people took time to think about Brutus' argument, they would have realised how weak it actually was. Since Brutus' argument was weak, Anthony could exploit that and cleverly used emotions to gain the citizens' support. Shakespeare portrays the Roman citizens very much like the ordinary population of the Elizabethan society. Distinct characters of human nature are clearly shown by them. They have a sense of pity for the weak, but would still follow the strong and successful because they are selfish and want to succeed. They have a fickle nature because they do not give much thought to problems, and would agree with anyone who is slightly reasonable, regardless of their actual intentions. Modern politicians are very good at exploiting this weakness in human nature, and can manipulate people easily. Great leaders, such as Hitler and Churchill, are famous for their speeches. Great rhetoricians could be given almost any subject and could persuade the people to agree with them. Even more important then rhetoric skills, a good speaker should understand human nature, and should know what the audience is thinking so he/she can adjust the balance of his/her speech to guide to audience to his/her intentions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. By Explaining The Speeches Of Brutus And Mark Anthony, Show Which Seems To Be ...

    However, Brutus was mistaken. He also left Anthony because he trusted him a lot. It was a bad idea to leave him for he did not listen to what he had to say, so that if Mark Anthony said something against Brutus' speech Brutus would be there to argue against it.

  2. With close reference to the text explain how Mark Anthony manipulates the crowd after ...

    Furthermore Anthony remarks "I fear I wrong the honourable men whose dagger have stabbed Caesar: I do fear it" Anthony pretends to feel guilty. This makes the crowd trust him more because they feel that he is innocence and is speaking for justice and not for power.

  1. Julius Caersar - Analysis of Brutus

    In this snap shot, we see many unfortunate things. Shakespeare gives us the idea that many people try to circumvent what the future holds, such as unfortunate things, by being superstitious. Superstition seems to play a role in the basic daily life of most Roman citizens.

  2. Comparison of the Speeches made by Brutus and Antony in the Marketplace

    It is also important, as it would mean that everyone would be able to see Caesar, and everyone would be able to hear what Antony had to say. Antony then tells the people that if they have tears, they should prepare to shed them (this is another example of Antony

  1. What do we learn about the characters of Cassius and Brutus in these scenes, ...

    and it is on this point that many power struggles have happened during the course of the play. The power struggle between the two main characters Brutus and Cassius, which has caused Cassius to be constantly belittled and mocked by Brutus, e.g.

  2. If Caesar had lived, would he have become a tyrant?

    This scene also makes clear to us that Cassius has formed a conspiracy with some friends to kill Caesar. Casca and Cassius both agree that they need a powerful figure, like Brutus in order to successfully pull off such a stunt.

  1. A Comparative Study of the Two Funeral Speeches from Act II, Scene II of ...

    And after this let Caesar seat him sure, for we will shake him, or worse days indure. Act 1, Scene 2, Line 304. He is basically saying that if he doesn't kill Caesar, Rome will be ruined. He sends Brutus a letter, containing his points for creating the conspirity.

  2. 'Julius Caesar'- Shakespeare

    (Act 3 scene 3, lines86-88) This quote tells us the audience that Caesar brought captives and money, which he gave to the public funds.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work