Explain why Act 3 Scene 2 of Julius Caesar is a pivitol episode in the play.

Authors Avatar

Y10EN1:        Shakespeare Coursework  -        Anton Leacock

Explain why Act 3 Scene 2 of Julius Caesar is a pivitol episode in the play.  In your answer, you should refer to

  • The main events leadeing up to, and following on from, this scene
  • The context and purposes of the speeches made by Brutus and Mark Anthony
  • The persuasive techniques they adopt to achieve their purposes
  • Who is more successful and why

Act 3 Scene 2 is most deffinately a pivitol episode in the play.  In this essay I will be explaining why that is the case.

In the previous Scene, Act 3 Scene 1, Caesar refuses to read the Soothsayer’s warning.  He mocks the soothsayer by saying, “the ides of March are come.”  This turns out to be very foolish by Caesar as, not long after this mockery, Caesar is stabbed by a group of conspirators.

After Caesar is murdered, Brutus allows Mark Anthony to address the crowd at Caesars funeral.  However, there is one condition, Brutus instructs Anthony “You shall not in your funeral speech blame us.  But speak all good you can devise of Caesar.”  Anthony is allowed to say pretty much what he wants except he must not blame Brutus and the other conspirators for the death of Caesar.

Join now!

In Act 3 Scene 3 (the scene following on from the one in question) the Roman citizens have been stirred up to anger, they are very much against the conspirators: so much so that they kill an innocent man simply because he happens to have the same name as one of the conspirators.

It is in the scenes directly following Act 3 Scene 2 that we see two clear, hostile ‘armys’ or groups.  One led by Anthony, the other by Brutus.  However there seems to be friction between two members of Brutus’ camp- Brutus and Cassius.  Cassius aggressively ...

This is a preview of the whole essay