• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore The Ways In Which The Monster In Shelly's Frankenstein And Kingshaw In I'm The King Of The Castle Are Presented As Victims.

Extracts from this document...


Wide Reading Coursework Explore The Ways In Which The Monster In Shelly's Frankenstein And Kingshaw In I'm The King Of The Castle Are Presented As Victims. Frankenstein and I'm The King Of The Castle are the two novels that I studied they both had similar themes. The marvellous book of Frankenstein is about the character Victor Frankenstein who as a child was fascinated by electricity. He grew up to be an ambitious scientist. He was obsessed about inventing a new species that would look up to him. He desired to become like god. Victor created a hideous monster by galvanism alternatively abandoning the monster; Victor became reckless not caring about the consequences to others. I'm The King Of The Castle is openly showing the relationship between the parent and child. Kingshaw's mother Helena is single and his father died at war. Hooper's mother died six years ago and lives with his father Joseph. Helena and Kingshaw move into Warings with Joseph and his son. Both parents have many ambitions to lead them to a higher status in life. These ambitions proceed them to become careless about their children's feelings. Kingshaw is being tormented by Hooper and feels alone and segregated from his mother because she rejects him at a certain time in the story. These novels are similar for shocking and different reasons. There are similarities between the lonely monster and innocent Kingshaw trying hard to fit in with everybody around them and similarly they are both being rejected. ...read more.


The monster is like a child who has been rejected by his creator and attacked by people that he does not know. Trying to find a reason for the rejection of his creator and the behaviour of the villagers he does not realise until later on that the only difference between him and the people is that he looks different to them. He still has hunger, thirst, feelings and thoughts just like all the other people. Does his form of appearance make him a monster? In chapter fifteen the old man De'Lacey was left alone in the cottage by his own desire as Safie, Agatha and Felix went for a long walk. De'Lacey allowed the monster to come in to the cottage. He was not afraid of the monster. 'Enter' 'And I will try in what manner I can relieve your wants but unfortunately my children are far from home and as I am blind I am afraid I shall find it difficult to procure food for you' Mary Shelly is pointing out that everyone can be prejudice. We all can judge or have an opinion about appearance on the outside without considering what they are really like from the inside. De'Lacey is not afraid of the monster because he cannot judge of the monsters countenance but he believes that the monster is sincere the same in reality as in appearance. Both novels are criticising society at that period of time and disrespecting the religions and accepted beliefs. ...read more.


He knew that it wasn't his fault but still seemed to have thoughts about the fall. The monster also becomes a victim of his own thoughts as he becomes outraged by revenge. 'I like an arch-fiend bare a hell within me and...wished to tear up he trees, spread havoc and destruction around me....' 'I bent my mind towards injury and death' Personally I don't think he is responsible for his behaviour because he has learned it from the books and how everyone has treated him. He now knows that he never be respected by any one because everyone is prejudiced. The novel has an epistolary structure by writing the story as letters to Mrs Saville from Robert Walton. This is because at that time it was unusual that a woman would write a book about science. So including the extra character has made the story more interesting and believable. My conclusion is to sum up who is the greatest victim. In my opinion I would choose a reality subject so I have decided that Kingshaw is a more severe victim than the monster. My reason is that Kingshaw feels unwanted and lonely and a real child could be in that type of situation where as the monster, there is no such thing. Together both novels end with both victims committing suicide. Others may say the monster is the greatest victim because no one can except him because of his appearance and he was abandoned on the day he was created. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Sofia Tariq 10MW English Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Susan Hill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Susan Hill essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How does Susan Hill use Gothic techniques to create tension and horror in the ...

    5 star(s)

    However, he should be afraid, as he still does not recognize the sound. The reader is fearful for the solicitor, for they sense that the sound could be dangerous. This fragment from Arthur Kipps' retrospective narrative gives additional knowledge to the reader about the narrator.

  2. The King of the Castle Character Assessment Joseph Hooper.

    the Red Room; and he wanted his son to be engaged and experienced about it too. He also said to Edmund that everything would belong to him and he should learn the value of what he will inherit. Joseph knew only a part of Edmund, and he knew that he

  1. I'm the King of the Castle by Susan Hill. - Throughout the novel, what ...

    There are only subtle hints of this and some small clues earlier on. This is a very good way of writing because it gets the reader more interested and also puts the reader in between the parents and the children, because the parents are completely oblivious to what is going on between them.

  2. The Mad, Drunk man Incident.

    When we got there I became even more frightened; there were footprints coming across the shore towards us but there were none going back. What if he was at the camp? Waiting for us. Was he there planning an ambush?

  1. A comparative study of the role of children and the presentation of the experiences ...

    Leo never had the upper hand though. He kept taking the notes right to the end. The most obvious technical difference between these two novels is the narrative. The Go-Between is a first person narrative. It is Leo as an old man looking back at his summer in the house.

  2. How does Susan Hill evoke feelings of anxiety and fear in the reader?

    But he does this very subtly without him actually saying it, as Arthur might start asking questions that he knows something. In normal circumstances no normal person would venture back to Eel Marsh House.

  1. woman in black coursework

    It develops that something strange is about to happen, because in her novel every time the 'frets' are up something bad does happens and the Woman In Black appears. Hill sets the area in a happy, bustling town, this makes it seem more catastrophic because you know something bad is

  2. Can Hooper be seen as anything other than Evil? A comparative Essay on 'I'm ...

    when Mr Hooper tells Hooper that Kingshaw and Helena Kingshaw are coming to live with them, when he is told this he thinks "This is my house," he thought, "it is private, I got here first. Nobody should come here."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work