• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore The Ways In Which The Monster In Shelly's Frankenstein And Kingshaw In I'm The King Of The Castle Are Presented As Victims.

Extracts from this document...


Wide Reading Coursework Explore The Ways In Which The Monster In Shelly's Frankenstein And Kingshaw In I'm The King Of The Castle Are Presented As Victims. Frankenstein and I'm The King Of The Castle are the two novels that I studied they both had similar themes. The marvellous book of Frankenstein is about the character Victor Frankenstein who as a child was fascinated by electricity. He grew up to be an ambitious scientist. He was obsessed about inventing a new species that would look up to him. He desired to become like god. Victor created a hideous monster by galvanism alternatively abandoning the monster; Victor became reckless not caring about the consequences to others. I'm The King Of The Castle is openly showing the relationship between the parent and child. Kingshaw's mother Helena is single and his father died at war. Hooper's mother died six years ago and lives with his father Joseph. Helena and Kingshaw move into Warings with Joseph and his son. Both parents have many ambitions to lead them to a higher status in life. These ambitions proceed them to become careless about their children's feelings. Kingshaw is being tormented by Hooper and feels alone and segregated from his mother because she rejects him at a certain time in the story. These novels are similar for shocking and different reasons. There are similarities between the lonely monster and innocent Kingshaw trying hard to fit in with everybody around them and similarly they are both being rejected. ...read more.


The monster is like a child who has been rejected by his creator and attacked by people that he does not know. Trying to find a reason for the rejection of his creator and the behaviour of the villagers he does not realise until later on that the only difference between him and the people is that he looks different to them. He still has hunger, thirst, feelings and thoughts just like all the other people. Does his form of appearance make him a monster? In chapter fifteen the old man De'Lacey was left alone in the cottage by his own desire as Safie, Agatha and Felix went for a long walk. De'Lacey allowed the monster to come in to the cottage. He was not afraid of the monster. 'Enter' 'And I will try in what manner I can relieve your wants but unfortunately my children are far from home and as I am blind I am afraid I shall find it difficult to procure food for you' Mary Shelly is pointing out that everyone can be prejudice. We all can judge or have an opinion about appearance on the outside without considering what they are really like from the inside. De'Lacey is not afraid of the monster because he cannot judge of the monsters countenance but he believes that the monster is sincere the same in reality as in appearance. Both novels are criticising society at that period of time and disrespecting the religions and accepted beliefs. ...read more.


He knew that it wasn't his fault but still seemed to have thoughts about the fall. The monster also becomes a victim of his own thoughts as he becomes outraged by revenge. 'I like an arch-fiend bare a hell within me and...wished to tear up he trees, spread havoc and destruction around me....' 'I bent my mind towards injury and death' Personally I don't think he is responsible for his behaviour because he has learned it from the books and how everyone has treated him. He now knows that he never be respected by any one because everyone is prejudiced. The novel has an epistolary structure by writing the story as letters to Mrs Saville from Robert Walton. This is because at that time it was unusual that a woman would write a book about science. So including the extra character has made the story more interesting and believable. My conclusion is to sum up who is the greatest victim. In my opinion I would choose a reality subject so I have decided that Kingshaw is a more severe victim than the monster. My reason is that Kingshaw feels unwanted and lonely and a real child could be in that type of situation where as the monster, there is no such thing. Together both novels end with both victims committing suicide. Others may say the monster is the greatest victim because no one can except him because of his appearance and he was abandoned on the day he was created. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Sofia Tariq 10MW English Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Susan Hill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Susan Hill essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How does Susan Hill use Gothic techniques to create tension and horror in the ...

    5 star(s)

    However, he should be afraid, as he still does not recognize the sound. The reader is fearful for the solicitor, for they sense that the sound could be dangerous. This fragment from Arthur Kipps' retrospective narrative gives additional knowledge to the reader about the narrator.

  2. Looking in detail at ‘The Woman in Black’explore how Susan Hill builds and sustains ...

    Susan Hill uses long sentences which gives the reader the feeling that Mr Kipps is exhausted and tired from riding the bicycle. "I returned some four hours and thirty-odd miles later in a positive glow of well being." Susan Hill writes about this particular thing at the beginning because tension

  1. I'm the King of the Castle by Susan Hill. - Throughout the novel, what ...

    James Davies Year 11 English Course work November 2002 Kingshaw decided to run away, when their parents went on a trip.

  2. Discussing Robert Cormiers' Heroes.

    Some problems are resolved in this story- others aren't. First person is used as Francis retells us his past whilst talking about his present, and hopefully future. Pearl Harbour is mentioned in chapter 7 but not directly. The chapter ends with him planning on meeting with Nicole on December 7th 1941, the date the Japanese launched an attack Pearl Harbour.

  1. 'The Go-Between' by L.P.Hartley - "It did not occur to me that they had ...

    The prologue and the opening chapters of the novel inform the reader of what the younger Leo was like, and it is here that they feel no sympathy towards him due to his pompousness and self-importance after his gain in respect and authority at school after the Jenkins and Strode saga.

  2. Compare and contrast the presentation of Charles Kingshaw and Edmund Hooper in I'm the ...

    to escape to woods, Edmund is not so capable and completely relies on adults, he could be jealous of Kingshaw's independence. This could be a cause of the bullying; Kingshaw might be so independent because he has had less attention from adults, especially from his mother.

  1. woman in black coursework

    same position as Arthur Kipps when he encounters everything in his journey. He describes his meeting with the Woman In Black that he 'felt an indescribable repulsion of fear.' This describes the unbearable fear that he felt with encountering the Woman In Black.

  2. I'm The King Of The Castle, by Susan Hill - Who Is Responsible For ...

    This is now how Kingshaw felt, trapped with nowhere to run or hide. He can see no escape from the torture living at Warings. Kingshaw becomes even angrier when he learns that Fielding has asked Hooper to become his friend behind Kingshaw's back.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work