Explore The Ways In Which The Monster In Shelly's Frankenstein And Kingshaw In I'm The King Of The Castle Are Presented As Victims.

Authors Avatar

Wide Reading Coursework

Explore The Ways In Which The Monster In Shelly's Frankenstein And Kingshaw In I'm The King Of The Castle Are Presented As Victims.

Frankenstein and I'm The King Of The Castle are the two novels that I studied they both had similar themes. The marvellous book of Frankenstein is about the character Victor Frankenstein who as a child was fascinated by electricity. He grew up to be an ambitious scientist. He was obsessed about inventing a new species that would look up to him. He desired to become like god. Victor created a hideous monster by galvanism alternatively abandoning the monster; Victor became reckless not caring about the consequences to others.

I'm The King Of The Castle is openly showing the relationship between the parent and child. Kingshaw's mother Helena is single and his father died at war. Hooper's mother died six years ago and lives with his father Joseph. Helena and Kingshaw move into Warings with Joseph and his son. Both parents have many ambitions to lead them to a higher status in life. These ambitions proceed them to become careless about their children's feelings. Kingshaw is being tormented by Hooper and feels alone and segregated from his mother because she rejects him at a certain time in the story.

These novels are similar for shocking and different reasons. There are similarities between the lonely monster and innocent Kingshaw trying hard to fit in with everybody around them and similarly they are both being rejected. They are simply requesting for equality to be treated the same and not as an individual because of their appearance or their past. Frankenstein is about human creation, which was very offensive to religion. It was written in1818 when all the people believed God created life and God took life. Galvanism was used in the story of Frankenstein, which was an early experiment in using electricity to resuscitate patients. It was amazing at that time to find out what science could do many people thought it was a miracle.

I'm The King Of The Castle was published in 1970 but set in the 1960's. This was a time when families were happy and children content like the saying 'children should be seen and not heard'. Susan hill is criticising this idea. It is a very unusual novel showing children in a negative light and the evil that children are capable of. Coming to a conclusion I think that both novels are a criticism of society at the time and were outspoken against accepted beliefs. These novels were unusual when they were published because they were opposing to society.

Join now!

The most significant way in which Kingshaw is seen as a victim is from Hooper and his tormenting. This is clearly shown in the beginning of the novel when Hooper is looking down at Kingshaw from the window and throws the note. The note is showing the early relationship between both of them.

'I don’t want you to come here'

Susan Hill is demonstrating the relationship amongst them that will develop through the story. It is as though Hooper is marking his territory and Kingshaw is a threat. Using the note Hooper is warning Kingshaw to stay ...

This is a preview of the whole essay