• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Frankenstein declares that in a "scientific pursuit there is continual food for discovery and wonder." Is this the impression with which Shelley's varied presentation of "scientific pursuit" in the novel leaves you?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Frankenstein declares that in a "scientific pursuit there is continual food for discovery and wonder." Is this the impression with which Shelley's varied presentation of "scientific pursuit" in the novel leaves you? Helen Williams Mary Shelley does indeed give a varied manifestation of "scientific pursuit." It is presented to us in the form of narrative technique, and the relation of the tales of Victor Frankenstein - the scientist, Robert Walton the explorer and the Daemon - a product of "scientific pursuit." Of course each character has his own opinion on the subject and thus the reader is left to draw from the novel his or her own judgment. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is written in several different narrative frames, the first being Captain Robert Walton's letters to his sister in England, whilst he is on a voyage of discovery to the North Pole. He relates the sightings of the creature and the discovery of Victor Frankenstein in his letters. At the end of the final letter, Walton introduces Victor's tale, and we are then assured that the main narrator throughout the novel will be Walton, and that the tale of Victor (and later the tale of the Daemon) will be related through him. This theme of lecturing happens to be ongoing throughout the novel. ...read more.

Middle

Once again the selfishness of the pursuit of glory is paramount, succeeding the search for knowledge. Because Walton has overcome a minor problem on his expedition (the leakage) he becomes overconfident and believes that he can overcome any obstacles of nature: ""Why not still proceed over the untamed yet obedient element?" Victor Frankenstein has too much ambition for his own good: "Wealth was an inferior object, but what glory would attend the discovery..." The isolation that he experiences is very much self-inflicted. Frankenstein was self-taught in subjects that only he had interest in: the principles of life. The major path that he followed was influenced by this solitary learning of an unconventional topic. Fastidiously studying a topic left untouched by all before him, his ignorant ambition conquers all morals as he persists searching for recognition and immortality - as a result of man's quest for knowledge, the ultimate isolation of a being is created. It is extremely irresponsible, and proves that man may not be strong enough to deal with the "continual food for discovery and wonder." "Now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart. ...read more.

Conclusion

I believe that it is in the account of the Daemon's solitude that Shelley portrays the true meaning of Frankenstein's statement: that in a "scientific pursuit there is continual food for discovery and wonder." The Creature is innocent, and does not wish to discover anything more than is to be expected of a 'normal' being. He wishes to pursue the knowledge of emotional communication that will provide him with friends to love and who will love him. He does not long for science that will improve his situation in society or make him glorious and famous, unlike Walton and Frankenstein. It is ironic that both Walton and Frankenstein fail in their final ambitions. Walton does not make it to the North Pole, and Frankenstein does not destroy the Daemon. As a whole, the novel left me with the impression that 'with great knowledge comes great responsibility,' and that it is doubtful that there is anyone who can succeed who has ideal morals and is selfless. It is a frightening prospect that "scientific pursuit" could get into the wrong hands. It is also remarkable that the Daemon is the last character in the novel to speak - his is the view that we are left with - the lasting impression. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. How does Mary Shelley present Frankenstein the monster and what do we find out ...

    In my opinion, I believe that Mary Shelley is trying to tell us that a monster will always be a monster and what ever you do you can't change that. Both Robert Walton and Victor Frankenstein were too ambitious and hadn't thought about the consequences.

  2. Mary Shelley reveals Frankenstein as a scientific success but a parental failure. Evaluate the ...

    (This negative parenting leads Victor to devastating affects which he regrets later.) As Victor is sent to the University of Ingolstad in Balvania, before he leaves, his mother dies having caught a disease, he feels that a child should never have a chance to bury their own parents and believes his mother dieing was pure evil.

  1. Mary Shelley explores the discovery of scientific possibilities, obsession and the consequence of desires ...

    The start of it all comes in Belrive when he "witnessed the most terrible and violent thunderstorm"; he is highly intrigued by this thunderstorm and especially by the oak that becomes nothing more than a "blasted stump" when it is struck by the "dazzling light".

  2. In what ways is Shelly's novel a statement against interfering with nature?

    Since Shelly's time, science has become more dangerous and developed significantly. If she looked at science in modern terms, would she still be against interfering with nature? Science can be a risk but depending upon the level of sophistication. In the 1800s people living to be 45-50 but now life expectancy has increased.

  1. Compare three stories of suspense in three different styles of writing

    looking at the story happening in your mind when you are reading. The technique of writing in the third person in this story has worked to its advantage since it has done just that. When reading "Man Overboard", I detected that Churchill supplied a lot of information about the locale

  2. Examine Mary Shelley's presentation of the relationship between Frankenstein and the creature!

    It is at this description that Frankenstein comments of it being 'beautiful'. This reaction could be compared to that of a parent whose love for their child is so obsessive and unconditional, that they see only beauty, even in the face of deformity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work