• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Frankenstein's savage patterns suggest that he not the apparently more civilised creature is the true monster.'

Extracts from this document...


'Frankenstein's savage patterns suggest that he not the apparently more civilised creature is the true monster.' It is a common misconception of many thousands of children that have been lead to think it is not Victor Frankenstein but it is his creature that is called Frankenstein. This to me is quite ironic as it is my belief that the monster itself was Victor Frankenstein and not his creation. If the two of their names can be mistaken in society then I believe that this also implies that they have rather similar characteristics as well. Frankenstein creates in himself an idol to challenge that of God, he, in effect, kills three if not four people during his time playing this part, although indirectly. In Frankenstein, Dr. Victor Frankenstein is an inspiring scientist that studies the dead. He wants to be the first person to give life to a dead human being. He spends all of his time concentrating on this goal, and gives up his family and friends. Frankenstein is the single most important novel written during the period of Gothicism. It exceeds the normal expectation of a typical Gothic novel by relating to science, politics, family, alienation, psychology, relationships, education and more. Even so, Frankenstein is classed as a classic Gothic novel because if you think about it nothing would say gothic horror like an eight-foot high monster with sewn together body parts made from other deceased humans. I think Frankenstein was written as a Gothic novel because it was written at the time of the Gothic Literary movement and Mary Shelley would have been influenced by the style of the time. ...read more.


He uses a contrast of beauty against ugliness to describe him. He expects the monster to know everything when he wakes up cool, calm, and collected. But when the monster is awakened, he does not know anything. He sees a world different from what he is used to, which makes him nervous and scared, but it is not his fault. The monster has not removed himself from his environment; Victor has removed him from dead. And the coward that Victor is he leaves it for dead and runs away in self-pity. Instead of facing the consequences, he left out of unjustifiable hate for his creation. He could not destroy the monster because he had actually made the monster better than the human race itself. Instead he was sure that lack of experience in the world would get rid of the monster for him. Here is when I believe Frankenstein moved one step closer to becoming a monster. In my view there are two types of a monster. One of which is the stereotyped: A hideous creature, being around it is terrifying, it is a monster that cannot do anything about what it is or looks like, yet is not necessarily evil or cruel. The second type of monster is hardly recognisable as what he is to people around him, it, or whatever you might call it. He would appear like an ordinary person like you and me, but it is inside where the monstrosity comes in. ...read more.


Frankenstein realised the creature had the opposite of the originally intended effect on himself; his life was ruined, the creature being at fault. The conclusion that you could reach from the all his actions is that the creature deserves no pity. Though these may be completely valid points there are other ways to look at it. The terrible things the monster did were brought on by the neglect and rejection he suffered, and not being allowed to have someone to love and care for. These are all things humans cannot deal with, making us feel more pity because of what he was driven to and the human needs and emotions he shows. The book tells a lot about human nature, that people are not made by their nature but their nurture. 'If people are brutalized, they'll be brutal themselves'- Mary Shelly In the 1800's creating a being was extremely frowned upon and seen as very immoral but in this day and age, even though I still believe it to be immoral, people are more educated about the consequences of doing such things. Today, what seemed like fiction in Mary Shelley's time now sounds more and more like true fact. After considering all the corners of this argument I have come to the conclusion that this man created a monster. Mostly for his selfish cravings for power and fame. Frankenstein had a blank canvas and chose to paint it with evil. A man that can unnaturally create a being then turn it into a monster is surely far from being a saint. Ethically no one should be allowed to play God. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. To what extent is Frankenstein typical of the Gothic genre?

    and traits which contribute to the reader's opinion that they are ultimately linked together. As we see from their various conversations, the Monster and Victor are both eloquent and well-spoken. They also both have the same habit of gnashing their teeth as Walton explains that Victor "sometimes he gnashes his

  2. "Frankenstein's savage passions suggest that he, not the apparently more civilised creature, is the ...

    some contrast here as she took her life as she suffered from depression and neglect. When the creature and Frankenstein first come face-to-face Frankenstein says, "Come on, then, that I may extinguish the spark which I so negligently bestowed." This quote is full of hatred and anger and shows that

  1. In the novel Victor creates this monster and then abandons it, this leaves the ...

    Is it Victor because he created the "monster" then abandoned it? Is it Victor, for "playing god" and creating a life, then instantly rejecting it to fend for itself or is it the so-called "monster" who is just a product of society?


    he also wouldn't search for a mother or female companion to guide and look after him. When the creature sees the De- Lacy family he loves them and when they are sad he empathises with them. "...I was deeply affected by it ..."

  1. 'Frankenstein's savage passions suggest that he, not the apparently more civilised creature, is the ...

    It brings into context how the creature is feeling; you can imagine it was said calmly as if he were still upset, I feel sympathy toward the creature Victor has gone deep into the mountains to reconcile what he has done.

  2. Children's Politics.

    So now lots of the mummies and daddies don't like him because he is a bit mad, and some little children are scared of him because he is so mean and horrible to them. He wants you to give him lots of mars bars to get good medicine and have good teachers.

  1. Is Frankensteins creation is a creature or a monster?

    After Williams murder Frankenstein refers to William as a 'dear angel.' This is ironic that Frankenstein who has tried to play God refers to his brother as an angel. Then the light 'illuminated' the creation. We associate illumination with angels being lit so Shelley makes the reader think of who really is the angel?

  2. Compare three stories of suspense in three different styles of writing

    This poem truly illustrates the stress in the author's life. The mood of the poem is poignant, mysterious and also there is suspense within the poem. The poet used a dark, dreary night to make the mood appear sadder and suspense filled.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work