Frankenstein Vs. The Monster.

Authors Avatar

Frankenstein Vs. The Monster

        At this point in the novel, I sympathize with the monster even though he has become a terrible person.  As his creator, Victor Frankenstein should have cared for the monster despite his disgusting appearance.  Frankenstein failed to provide the monster with any type of parental guidance and instead ran away from his responsibilities.  In the first few hours of his birth, the monster is faced with rejection, even from his creator.  If Frankenstein would have guided and nurtured him, then the monster would have never sought revenge on Frankenstein and his family.  

However, I sympathize mostly with the monster because he is no the one to blame.  I believe with most instances that the parent is the one to blame.  The parent influences a child the most in that child’s life.  If a child lives in a bad or corrupt family that child will live with a damaged past.  All that child knows is the failure of a family.  Therefore, there is a continuation of this through family generations.

Join now!

        Without a home or any place to go, the monster is forced to live in the forest in the winter.  He is forced to teach himself how to survive.  Fortunately, the monster finds a noble family from which he learns.  If the monster would have encountered a family in which the husband was an abusive drunk and the wife beat her children, Frankenstein would have evolved into a different person.

 The monster is hated by every person he encounters.  Frankenstein calls his creation a horrible disaster, which leaves a mark on the monster.  The creator leaves him for dead ...

This is a preview of the whole essay