From your study of The Crucible would you say that Miller intended there to be a hero and/or a villain? Justify your answer by close reference to the play.

Authors Avatar

                                 

From your study of THE CRUCIBLE would you say that Miller intended there to be a hero and/or a villain? Justify your answer by close reference to the play.

I think Arthur Miller did mean there to be both a villain and a hero in his play. However the way he wrote his play made it so you would not have guessed some of their identities straight away.

I consider John Proctor to be the hero of this play and Abigail Williams to be the villain.

The characteristics that I think Miller believes a hero must have, beyond any other, is loyalty, and Proctor has that trait. He also must be brave and, in most respects, honest. He does not show these qualities when he appears in the beginning.

At the start of the play Proctor shows little promise of heroism, he seems aggressive, violent, especially towards Mary Warren and Abigail, threatening to “show you a great doin’ on you arse” and ‘asking’ if they “look for a whippin’?”. However he has a reason to be angry with Mary Warren as she is his servant and she has disobeyed his orders.

Join now!

We can tell that he does not mind threatening people that he believes are lower then him but he does not let people who believe that they are higher then him push him around. He stands up for himself and for what he believes in, even if it means going against authority, “I like not the smell of this ‘authority’.”

He understands and admits what he had done wrong, even though he does not tell everyone until a point of crisis (when Abigail prays in the court: “Whore!”). He tries so hard to keep away from Abigail and temptation and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay