• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hard Times - a look at Victorian education and the first part of the novel.

Extracts from this document...


The education system in the 19th century was one of the more prominent floors in society. Trainee teachers usually began work around 14 years of age, predictably resulting in poor quality teaching. Subjects and topics were drilled repeatedly until set deep into the children's memories. Numbers of children to a class were incredibly high, meaning there was a huge lack min teacher - pupil relationship. If you happened to be particularly bright then you were likely to be dragged behind whereas if you were unfortunately slow, then you would be left behind with no special help or encouragement. Authorities were very domineering; everybody was expected to be able to follow the system, personal differences were not taken into account in any way productive. Corporal punishment is another feature commonly used by Victorian teachers; children were often beaten because of mistakes, and as you can imagine, violence from teachers was a frequent event mainly due to the narrow minded peremptory conditions. Evidently, the consequences of such an education produced uniformity to such a degree that linked each child into the system. The sense of depersonalisation that consumed the tender young imaginations, so vivid and active - the impersonal existence that dissolved away any trace of flourishing enthusiasm and discarded the dregs; deadpan, stunted adults. ...read more.


The massive contrast between Sissy and Bitzer's character continues right through to the way they look and carry themselves. Sissy blushes and curtseys when Gradgrind draws attention to her showing that she is emotionally conscious and aware of her situation, whereas Bitzer has no other notable reaction other than the 'correct' answer to Gradgrind's question. Bitzer's appearance is the complete opposite of Sissy: 'so light eyed and light haired that the self same rays appeared to draw out of him what little colour he ever possessed.' Bitzer's seeming deficiency in colour strongly suggests that being part of the education system has drawn out of him the fullness of being a child. The way he reacted to Gradgrind's attention was the way Gradgrind would have every child react - but Sissy didn't. I think Gradgrind has every intention of converting Sissy and by humiliating her I expect other children in the class would be coaxed into doing things his way. The government officer is reasonably similar to Gradgrind in several respects; he too believes that anything other than facts must be wrong - whether this is a statement, a thought or even an object: 'what you don't see in fact, you are not to have anywhere'. He makes it quite clear that fact is taste, and that one must 'never fancy'. ...read more.


Although the little Gradgrinds are said to have everything, the reader can clearly see that this is only materialistically speaking; they still have the desire the have fun, and to have fancies. Unfortunately this is completely contradictory to the way in which Gradgrind has brought them up. Education has progressed to such an extent over the past century; and by reading this extract I realise just how grateful I am that I'm being educated in the way of the 21st century. The lack of creativity in Victorian education absolutely horrifies me (probably due to my love of expressive arts), and I think that there is no way that the humiliation and dehumanisation could have had any positive affect on the children. There was no stimulation or variations of syllabus for different levels of academic intelligence and I think that the introduction of these things have had a positive and productive outcome. I am curious to read on having reached this point, especially to look into how the young Gradgrinds turn out. I'd also like to see how Sissy is affected by the system - if she is at all. One of the things that really makes me want to read on, is the introduction of several new characters fairly early in the story; the way they are linked to each other and how they differ as individuals seems to entice my imagination - I want to know what's going to happen next. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Hard Times section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Hard Times essays

  1. How does Dickens present his negative views on education in Victorian society?

    Thomas Gradgrind, a Victorian teacher, one which was the complete opposite of Charles Dickens' views on education, and Dickens expresses this in the name Gradgrind. It can be interpreted as GRADually GRINDing, away at the children of the school, teaching them nothing but facts with very little or indeed no time for fancy.

  2. Compare and Contrast the role of Character and Characterization in the novels 'Hard Times' ...

    However, there appears to be no escape for Harry as, "...the glimmering truth began to dawn." Much like the character of Stephen in 'Hard Times,' it is too late to change; "You'd better have been satisfied as you were, and not have got married..."

  1. 'How does Dickens present education in particular Gradgrind's philosophy of education in Hard Times?

    Tom is disillusioned by this 'I wish I could collect all the facts we hear about so much, and all the figures, and all the people who found them out; and I wish I could put a thousand barrels of gunpowder under them, and blow them all up together!'

  2. Title: How does Dickens present the education system in Hard Times?

    Thomas Gradgrind, 'a man of realities' and 'a man of facts and calculations' who is a hard educator that grinds he students through a factory-like process, hoping to produce graduates, isn't very pleased with 'girl number twenty' as he calls her when she couldn't give the definition of a horse.

  1. By the end of Book 1, Dickens's criticism of Gradgrind's utilitarian thinking is apparent. ...

    He can only understand its factual purpose, "You seem to find more to look at in it than ever I could find" he says, putting this down to, "Another of the advantages...of being a girl" as his unimaginative mind cannot think of any other reason she can look deeper into the flames.

  2. Explain how the theme of education is presented in Hard Times. What comments do ...

    in reality and the school system is a likeness to the state of Britain and its government at the time. The school is seen as being efficient but emotionless and therefore Dickens is trying to say that though the government is fulfilling a baric duty to educate, it isn't taking

  1. Key Question: How does Charles Dickens show his dislike of the education system in ...

    However, the Speaker is forceful as he insists on, "plant nothing else, and root out everything else," to mould the children's minds. The image of rooting out illustrates a forceful and painful action in the reader's mind. Despite the motif of nature and plants, Dickens paints an austere and insensitive

  2. Using the first two chapters of Hard Times explore how Dickens shows his dislike ...

    lately turned at the same time in the same factory, on the same principles, like so many pianoforte legs'. Dickens describes all teachers identically with constant repetition of the word 'same'. Saying that all teachers are the same means that M'Choakumchild must be strict, disrespectful and a fact lover just like Gradgrind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work