• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hard Times - Would you agree, from your reading of the novel so far thatthere are some characters who are simply too good to be true?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Would you Agree, From your Reading of the Novel So Far that There are Some Characters Who are Simply Too Good to be True? There are a huge variety of characters in Hard Times, ranging from the good to the unnaturally cruel. The novel is full of extremity in its characterisation; cruel, bitter and selfish characters such as Mrs. Sparsit contrast dramatically with characters such as Stephen Blackpool and Rachael, who are benevolent and altruistic. Among the cruellest and most villainous characters in the novel is James Harthouse, who is completely ammoral, and therefore rendered very dangerous by Dickens. Josiah Bounderby, is another particularly cruel character. He is utterly self-centred and prejudiced against the working-class of the novel (he categorizes them all as being greedy and materialistic: "You [Stephen] don't expect to be set up in a coach and six, and to be fed on turtle soup and venison, with a gold spoon as a good many of 'em do!") Bounderby is almost a caricature and is satirised by Dickens for his constant emphasizing of his climb to success, after supposedly beginning his life in a ditch. ...read more.

Middle

In a way, Stephen's kindness is partly to blame for his unhappiness. It could be argued that he hasn't fought hard enough for the things he wants; for example, he is not actually a member of the worker's union. Stephen has a tendency to seem meek and quite passive. He seems gentle but is often depicted with too much sentimentality. It is almost frustrating the way that Stephen simply accepts that he cannot be with Rachael, and must remain in a loveless marriage, when it is clear that he is unhappy (though of course, moral conventions differed in Victorian times, meaning people had a different view of marriage and its connotations). Stephen's unhappiness is reflected in his sometimes confused tone; "'Tis a muddle, and that's aw", and his angst often manifests itself physically in his strange mannerisms; "..he was biting the long ends of his loose neckerchief as he walked along". His confusion is also obvious in the sequence describing his strange dream, in which Coketown is a representation of hell. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is sadly ironic in the way that the two people who are truly in love are prevented from being together by the rules of the social system, while Louisa, who is clearly reluctant, has been forced into a marriage by the expectations of the same society. Some characters in the novel are often sentimentalized and therefore sometimes do not seem believable. However, the novel is ultimately a satirical one, which is meant to make a point, and it is perhaps therefore more fitting that the 'good' characters are slightly exaggerated, in order to emphasize the dishonourable characteristics of people such as Harthouse. They are a kind of rebellion against the monotony of the utilitarian system, and Dickens uses them as an example. He uses Stephen in particular to promote character and integrity over learning. The good characters are not necessarily meant to be a naturalistic rendition of human personalities, but are instead use to provide the novel with interest in the form of contrasting attitudes and beliefs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Hard Times section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Hard Times essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Dickens's picture of Coketown with Lodge's introduction to the industrial environment ...

    This will be considered more constructively further on. It is clear that both texts are using a highly narrative style. However they differ in their approach used to attain their descriptive element. Much of the various language techniques employed have been utilised to accommodate for the writer's mode.

  2. Character Study of Stephen Blackpool From the Novel Hard Times.

    Nevertheless the latter statement can only be restricted to financial help and not all kinds of aid. This is because, before Louisa and Tom leave Tom Pulls Stephen urgently out of the room and says that he might be able to do him a favor and Stephen is ready to take the assistance in this matter.

  1. 'What are the reasons which Dickens gives for the hard times described in the ...

    In the Victorian society money meant power; the rich were getting richer and the poor were getting poorer. Mr Harthouse acts as a catalyst in bringing out Louisa's feelings. He was born into money which meant power. Like Mrs Sparsit and Bitzer, he makes hard times for other people.

  2. Hard times shows women as powerless and trapped with in a patriarchate society. How ...

    Gradgrind trys to show Sissy as a failure and he humiliates her but Sissy has her own kind of power and uses this to take no attention to Mr Gradgrind.

  1. Hard Times: Stephen Blackpool has been described by Dickens as "A man of great ...

    But if he is considered a man of perfect integrity he would not have an affair as this is not truth full and not what he would want in his heart. Yes you probably would have guessed it by now Stephen is married, Stephen realizes that he is always in a muddle and cant get out of it.

  2. Y10 English Literature Coursework

    This isn't a proper way of teaching because they give the children no room to think for themselves individually. Sissy Jupe is once again a victim as Gradgrind and the officer pick on her because they see her as an easy target.

  1. Analysis of Major Characters

    wiser and humbler man, ultimately "making his facts and figures subservient to Faith, Hope and Charity." Louisa Gradgrind Although Louisa is the novel's principal female character, she is distinctive from the novel's other women, particularly her foils, Sissy and Rachael.

  2. Compare and contrast the way in which particular aspects of education are presented in ...

    Dickens uses this idea to highlight the difference between Gradgrind's ideal pupil and Sissy who has not yet succumbed to the dehumanisation. This may have another meaning too; Gradgrind has not yet drained Sissy of her colour and emotions (she appears alive), yet Bitzer, a frequent victim of Gradgrind's lessons, has been sapped of these qualities.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work