• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Having Read Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck the section of the book in which Lennie kills Curley's wife, and having watched the same section of the film, do you think that the director made a good job of translating Steinbeck's words into film?

Extracts from this document...


Having Read Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck the section of the book in which Lennie kills Curley's wife, and having watched the same section of the film, do you think that the director made a good job of translating Steinbeck's words into film? What did you find particularly effective in the film, and what would you have done differently? After having read a small section of the novel 'Of Mice and Men' by John Steinbeck and then having viewed the appropriate section of the film the questions above will be discussed and answered in this essay. It will become clear that the director of the film has portrayed the characters on-screen in an effective and clever way, in that he retains the good positive things about the characters. The director has portrayed the film in a certain way from the novel and also has adapted some new ideas to make his film more of a success. I will look at these ideas and sections under camera, sound, lighting, editing and characterisation. Later a section will be written on the differences between the film and the novel; you will come to understand that the information on the choice of characters and the way that they have been translated to the screen, the two main characters we are studying are very differently perceived by the director and these are for reasons, they will be looked at in detail. The evaluation will be the final section, here there will be some alternative ideas of improvements which could have made the film a better representation of the novel. I will also look at the effective and ineffective things that happen in the film and look at them in detail. I will finish the evaluation with a summary of my answers to the title questions. In the section of the essay below, the film will be deconstructed to find out what all the individual technical parts do to make the film effective. ...read more.


When Lennie leaves the barn after killing Curley's wife it becomes very dark until he opens the door and the bright light shines on him as he leaves. This painfully bright light makes us realise how dark it was inside the barn. This is a very effective technique that the director has used very well in the film. The editing in a film is a very important factor. With a good edit to a scene it looks almost lifelike - as if you were there. By showing certain characters in a certain way and by introducing them to us in a friendly or unfriendly way we get to know the character better. George is the first character to be shown in this scene. We know that he is important as he looks very relaxed but also because the camera pans following him ignoring the other characters. By following George and watching him we are sub-consciously drawn to like him. As he is smiling when we are first introduced to him a nice pleasant image of George is pictured in our minds. The first time the camera focuses on Lennie it moves to a close up, this makes up sympathise with him. He has killed the dog and is very upset about this. The emotions of Lennie make the shot very upsetting but peaceful. The audience is deliberately drawn in to feel sorry for Lennie and not anger at his killing of the puppy. This has been used by the director, almost what the author of the novel would have wanted. During the conversation between Lennie and Curley's wife the camera shots start of as mid-shots but eventually work up towards being close-ups. Whilst the close-up shots are taking place the length of each shot decreases; this shows the mounting tension caused by the two characters. Having quicker shots forces the audience to think something bad is going to happen even without a soundtrack playing. ...read more.


By leaving it out it is more of a surprise when we find he kills Curley's wife on the screen than it would have been if we had visually seen his anger previously. If I was to direct a remake of this film there would be several things I would change. Firstly I would make Curley's wife appear as accurately as I could and make her a perfect representation of the character in the book. If this stopped some female viewers from watching I wouldn't be too disappointed as the film would not really make much money at the Box Office anyway. By making Curley's wife a real portrayal of the book it would have made the story more interesting and would have made the relationship between her and Lennie clearer. I think that this would have been a good addition. Also if I was to change another thing it would be the costume that Lennie wears. If we are meant to sympathise with Lennie it seems a lot harder to do with someone wearing dark, dirty clothes. I have agreed that this shows his character but in essence the director is trying to put across to different types on Lennie and he fails! Finally I will answer the title questions! There were three main questions to discuss and answer and my summary is below. I think Gary Sinese did an average job of translation Steinbecks novel into the film. He left out whole sections and completely changed some of the characters but still managed to capture the atmosphere of the novel and in particular managed to understand the character Lennie very well. I found the switching of the view of inside and outside of the barn very effective as well as other things such as the bird - acting as Curley's wife's soul - flying off up into the roof. I would have changed the character of Curley's wife and the look of Lennie's clothes as his appearance is very shabby. Michael Hough 28/04/2007 10:49 AM 10SEQ ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE John Steinbeck section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE John Steinbeck essays

  1. Of Mice and Men - The differences between the book and the film.

    In the novel the boss goes down to see them in the bunk house, "Lennie was just finishing making his bed. The wooden latch raised again and the door opened. A little stocky man stood in the open doorway". This differs to the film where George and Lennie are taken to see the boss in his office.

  2. How does John Steinbeck use George as a symbol of good friendship in ...

    Lennie told George what he had done and George tried to tell him that it would be all fine. Lennie gets George to tell him about the future again and then George takes out Carlson's lugar that he had taken and shot Lennie in the back of the head.

  1. Of Mice and Men - The character of Curley's wife can be regarded as ...

    of the story they are kept with this image of Curley's wife until the conversation with Lennie right at the end. Up to this point in the story we have only seen other people views on Curley's wife but we have not heard any thing from her about her self.

  2. Why I think Candy was added by John Steinbeck to his book

    When the subject of Candy's dog comes up, they decide to put the dog out of its misery and to kill it, '"This ol' dog jus' suffers hisself all the time."' They all try to tell Candy that the dog won't feel it after he admits that the dog should

  1. Of Mice And Men --- How does Steinbeck present the relationship between George and ...

    but immediately knows that Lennie had retrieved the mouse because his "feet was wet". Here, Steinbeck is creating a sense of repetition and deja vu, which further suggests to the reader that this relationship has spanned a long time, and so George's patience with Lennie is even more remarkable.

  2. Of Mice and Men - summary

    'Well you ain't bein' kind to him..' With these words Carlson is ironically 'sentencing' Lennie who will later suffer the same fate as the dog. Carlson assumes that Candy can soon get another pet, just as at the end of the novel he seems to assume that George can easily get another friend.

  1. A comparison between the opening section of the novel of 'of mice and men' ...

    It is dark and there are shadows. They had to jump on the train because they had no money and had to run away from Weed. There was an atmosphere of danger. There was no music at all except sounds of the train and whistles.

  2. A comparison of John Steinbeck's novel 'Of Mice and Men' and the 1939 film ...

    The emotional build-up is created in the novel with the description of Carlson who "continued to look down at the old dog" as Candy "watched him uneasily", this builds up tension between the two characters even more so as the other characters present are unaware of this non-verbal communication until Carlson finally speaks.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work