• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

Henry VI Part 1

Extracts from this document...


Comments How and why does the play extempore mark a turning point in the play? What is honour? Shakespeare's Henry IV Part One explores the various and contrasting interpretations of the three main protagonists' attitudes concerning honour, duty and the struggle between being responsible or living a life of self-indulgence. The play extempore is set in the Boar's Head Tavern, which is the frequent meeting place for Hal, Falstaff and the rest of the delinquents who follow them. In this act Hal and Falstaff both play the parts of the Prince and King as a jest to show how the confrontation between Hal and his father, though Falstaff has ulterior motives by wanting to make his final plea to Hal before he meets with his father. However, the play which began as a joke gains a more serious theme in which it becomes a turning point in the relationship between Hal and Falstaff. The play extempore marks the close of the comical, quick-witted characteristics in Hal and Falstaff's relationship and even marks a conclusion to the overall relationship shared between them. The structure of the play is fundamentally changed after the play extempore, because the comical subplot, 'the world of riot and dishonour' in the taverns, which previously was running parallel to the serious core plot, the heart of the play, is lost, and one of the three main personas, Hal, leaves the tavern world and enters into the world of duty and 'chivalry'. The play extempore is essentially the fulfilment of Hal's promises made in his soliloquy in Act One, Scene Two. Hal's soliloquy is foreboding and this scheming side of his character which he shows could possibly make him a successful king, because he realises that he doesn't want to be surrounded by sycophants like Falstaff, who only follow him for what it can bring them. Hal is revealing to the audience that in fact he is tricking everyone into believing that he is misbehaving when he is only putting on ...read more.


This suggests that Hal is demonstrating mental maturity because he not overwhelmed by Falstaff's age and realises that only he can tell Falstaff his flaws since he is the only one who sees through Falstaff's jovial fa�ade. In the play extempore Hal demonstrates his self control by allowing Falstaff to act as the King first, enabling Falstaff to tell his pathetic pleas to Hal and so that Hal doesn't have to reveal his intentions immediately. Whilst Falstaff is playing the King he tries to manipulate Hal and beg Hal to not banish him for his previous crimes once Hal eventually becomes King, because Falstaff probably feels that something not in his favour may occur when Hal meets the King and tries to obtain Hal's favour. This illustrates that Falstaff has not undergone any change since Act I when tried to persuade Hal to make him a judge once Hal becomes King. But, because Hal is sufficiently self aware and a true judge of character, he instinctively knows what Falstaff is trying to accomplish and does not fall for his ploy. Nevertheless, Hal decides to switch their roles once he becomes angered of Falstaff's continuous attempts to manipulate him, there is virtue in that Falstaff: him keep with, the rest banish. Once it is Hal's turn to play the role of the King he immediately sets out to viciously expose Falstaff and reveal his evil qualities. Hal states several scathing and withering insults to Falstaff, which include; That villainous abominable misleader of youth, Falstaff, that old white-bearded Satan. there is a devil haunts thee in the likeness of an old fat man; that Reverend Vice, that grey Iniquity, that father Ruffian, that Vanity in years? Hal identifies Falstaff as a villainous abominable misleader of youth because he attempted to manipulate Hal for his benefit. In addition to this, Falstaff tried to delude Hal through his evil behaviour but in reality fails because Hal is not swayed by Falstaff nor does he fall for his jovial fa�ade of his true self, he would have if he was not mature enough. ...read more.


This scene serves to diminish Hotspur's reputation and leave him in an unfavourable light because he quarrels with his father and uncle; causing their relationship to weaken and makes the audience feel that the plot is destined to fail. This greatly contrasts with how Hal deals with his father's own criticisms. In Act Three, Scene Three the King and the Prince finally meet and Hal is confronted with the criticisms of his father, which he had prepared himself for in the play extempore. The King compares Hal to Richard II, who had become a common site amongst the people. The King then explains he became the king because he calculated the affect of his rarity amongst the common people, the King doesn't realise that Hal also is cunning like his father because Hal only told the audience in his soliloquy of his intentions. The King compares himself to Hotspur who he sees as a fearless leader and has more of a claim to the crown than Hal. The King is showing to Hal how he would have prepared to have Hotspur as his son rather than Hal with these praises, this relates to Act One, Scene One when the King wished that his son had accidentally swapped with Hotspur. Hal shows great maturity because he doesn't react to his father's criticisms and acts humbly as he did in the play extempore. Hal promises to change his ways and accept his responsibility, this is further emphasising the point of his soliloquy in which he promises to change. From this point onwards Hal will emerge as a 'chivalrous' man in golden armour, as told in Vernon's description of Hal. Hal has conquered the world of 'riot and dishonour' and from the play extempore will enter the world of 'duty and chivalry' where he will become the most prominent figure and leave Hotspur in his wake. ?? ?? ?? ?? How and why does the play extempore mark a turning point in the play? 12/29/2008 Deji Olonilua 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Other Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Other Plays essays

  1. How does Shakespeare present the two different worlds of court life and the rural ...

    the idyll of the rural country life, like for instance the pompous attitude of Touchstone and the way he speaks in a fancy way to take advantage of people's lack of education in the forest. "Why if thou never wast at court, thou never sawest Good manners; if thou never

  2. How does Shakespeare present the two different worlds of Court life and the rural ...

    It is always the season of summer and is a world without seasons, thus making it a paradise, hence why I referred to it as the Garden of Eden in my introduction. There are many reasons why the country is referred to as a 'paradise' and as being 'idyllic.'

  1. How and why does the character of Scrooge change?

    he is threatened with dismissal when he tries to add even a little coal to his diminishing fire. Cratchit "couldn't replenish it, for Scrooge kept the coal-box in his own room; and so surely as the clerk came in with the shovel, the master predicted that it would be necessary for them to part.".

  2. What is John Proctor? I am no saint; for me it is fraud. I ...

    But the stage directions read that he only 'Glances' at her, an act that makes it obvious that he does not seem to return her feelings for him, as he only carelessly 'Glances' as her whereas she seems to be love struck by his presence.

  1. He may be entertaining, he may be clever, but Falstaff is morally repulsive and ...

    In contrast, further on in the play it seems that Hal does not want this any more, he does not want an entertainer, he does not want Falstaff. When in a mock acting situation between Hal and Falstaff, Hal is told to 'Banish/plump Jack' (2.4.397-398)

  2. Compare and contrast the relationship between Hal and Henry IV and the relationship between ...

    It is frequently changing in numerous essential aspects. It is evident that there are two main relationships he has, one with his father Henry IV and the other with Falstaff. Hal seems to struggle to sustain a good relationship with both of them at the same time and therefore enters a realm in which he oscillates from one to another.

  1. Women's Roles During The Shakespearean Era

    In most cases, if anything was to happen to either parent, the woman had made arrangements for someone to care for the children. An annulment was needed if the couple wished to be separated, however, the marriage usually lasted until death.

  2. Shakespearean plays have much been linked to Aristotles ideas of tragedy, the protagonists are ...

    The protagonist supposedly always has free will; although always seems to move unheedingly to their doom. Elizabethan tragedies differed slightly from Aristotelian tragedies; they generally had much more morbid endings in which the protagonist would die compared to the Aristotelian tragedy in which the protagonist would live.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work