• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hill presents Edmund Hooper as a violent imposing figure, who shows no sympathy.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked Hill presents Edmund Hooper as a violent imposing figure, who shows no sympathy? Hill presents the character Edmund Hooper as a unsympathetic character. Hill's uses the technique of 'unmitigated language' to present Edmund as unsympathetic character; "You were only tenants then", Edmund makes no effort to make his sentence any politer. The word "only" is chosen by Hill to try and 'degrade' Kingshaw's ' status and to portray him, inferior to Edmund. Hill continues to show that Edmund is an unsympathetic character; "When did he die?". The death of Kingshaw's father is a personnel matter, and the 'usual' person is likely to feel sympathetic towards Kingshaw. Hill purposefully gives the question asked by Edmund no expression, the reader has no idea how Edmund states the question. ...read more.

Middle

The reader develops an image of an emotionless child, Edmund shows no emotion towards his father either; "Hooper stood very still, turning the pencil round and round", the word 'still' can be linked to the lack of motion, Edmund is in one sense 'frozen', he emits no emotions, no warmth towards no one. 'Turning the pencil round and round' could suggest that Edmund is like an endless loop, he is shown to have no personality and trying to make contact with Edmund is like going 'round and round', you do not end up anywhere different, you keep on going round in a circle. Finally, Edmund is shown to be violent; "He raised his fists and came at Kingshaw". ...read more.

Conclusion

The word bash is not associated with humans but objects. It is unusual to say 'I'll bash you. Bash is a very violent word and the reader sees Edmund as intimidating and violent. The word "again" suggests that Edmund will willingly hurt someone, repeatedly. The repetetion of Edmunds violent nature tells gives the image of an imposing character. Hill tries to present Edmund as an imposing figure so that Edmunds character contrasts with Kingshaw. The reader sees Kingshaw as the victim and Edmund as the bully. The conflict between Kingshaw and Edmund is what engages the reader, and as the two characters have opposing personalities, conflict occurs a lot more frequently. The reader continues to read in anticipation that more conflict will occur, the conflict excites the reader and produces suspense. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Susan Hill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Susan Hill essays

  1. The King of the Castle Character Assessment Joseph Hooper.

    When Edmund gave a message saying, 'I DON'T WANT YOU TO COME HERE,' on a piece of scrap paper Kingshaw stuffed the message fearfully into his trouser pocket. This already gives us an outlook of his character, and the readers know straight away that he is a very terrified child.

  2. How does Susan Hill evoke feelings of anxiety and fear in the reader?

    He is dreaming of past memories and pleasant thoughts but then she launches us straight back into tension by hearing the "Cry" and unpleasantness of this desperate child and we wonder what is about to happen next. She uses a number of ways to climax and add tension to this chapter.

  1. Can Hooper be seen as anything other than Evil? A comparative Essay on 'I'm ...

    Before Hooper falls off the wall Kingshaw once again tries to help Hooper but when Hooper gets out of hospital he just says that Kingshaw pushed him off to try and kill him. Near the end of the book Mr Hooper and Mrs Kingshaw arrange for Kingshaw to go to

  2. Marble Hill House.

    fact that that Henrietta Howard had popularity although not on the reasons behind it, but most of the evidence from the source C is contrary to the evidence of sources A and B.

  1. How Well Is The Past Interpreted At The Blists Hill Museum?

    The ball furnace would be charged up to 1400�C and then the pig iron would be added to the furnace to remove any impurities. After that it would be taken to a steam hammer where it would be hammered so that it is reshaped and softened.

  2. This task requires me to identify trends that may occur in West London. I ...

    So now the employers have turned round to CBI (Confederation of British Industry) who are a collection of employees who meet with the government and discuss about issues, which affect the productivity in the UK businesses in order to stay competitive wit the rest of Europe.

  1. Chips with Everything - Corporal Hill

    Deformities and Misfits Pip and Smiler both have a 'deformity' that makes them stand out from the other conscripts. Pip stands out because of his upper class accent and superior attitude. However, he uses this to his advantage by capturing the conscripts' attentions with stories about his father and the upper classes to become their leader.

  2. Compare and contrast the portrayal of parent / child relationshipsin the two novels

    Mr Hooper and Hooper obviously do not have very clear channels of communication whereas Silas and Eppie know everything about each other and tell each other everything. I also said that a good p/c relationship needs to have trust and disipline.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work