How do both authors show how science can be used irresponsibly to have a negative effect on individuals in society?

Authors Avatar

How do both authors show how science can be used irresponsibly to have a negative effect on individuals in society?

Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley is a novel concerning the artificial creation of man, which has detrimental effects on society. In the novel, Victor Frankenstein sets about creating a manufactured human, in order to pursue the possibility of ridding the world of disease and infirmity. The book was written in the nineteenth century, a time when alchemy was moving to natural sciences. Society was still particularly romantic regarding creation of life.

Similarly, Supertoys, written by Brian Aldiss, is a series of short stories regarding creation of artificial intelligence – mechanical life. The series was originally written in 1969 – a time when technology was booming, proven by man on the moon. The series was continued 30 years later as technology is sky-high and the Internet is peaking. Some small parts of the stories are included in the 2001 film, AI: Artificial Intelligence. The series focuses on Henry Swinton, the head of his own business, which specialises in the manufacturing of new artificial life forms and his family as they become accustomed to the rich, yet superficial world of amazing technological advances.

In this essay I will be looking at how the two works prove how science, and more specifically technology and human endeavour can be dangerous to say the least to human society and the individuals within it as a whole.

There are many instances in the books when the negative effects science can have on society are highlighted. This is in the main delivered through artificial creation. Frankenstein creates his monster, which leads to negative effects in society such as murders of Frankenstein’s close friends and relatives. Whereas, the world of Supertoys creates androids with artificial intelligence, which create problems in society. For example, social divides are widened by the technology in that the rich can afford it and the poor can’t, therefore the two are separated irreversibly. Therefore, there must be reasoning behind the creations. Both authors show how science can be used for bad as well as good by looking at these reasons.

The two pieces are similar in that two of the main characters have good intentions before they create artificial life. In Frankenstein, Frankenstein intends to rid the world of disease: ‘If I could banish disease from the human frame…’ This signals Frankenstein’s good intentions and humanity, moreover, it proves his ambition. These are traits that are common to Henry Swinton in Supertoys also. For example, Swinton strives to create intelligent artificial life, not just artificial life.  Frankenstein wished to banish disease because his mother was fatally ill; therefore he desired to save her and others in the same situation. These good intentions led him to create the monster, which, as aforementioned, was how science had negative effects in society within the novel.

Similarly, in Supertoys, Henry Swinton wishes to create a perfect world. He tries to do this by making everything artificial and pulling the wool over peoples eyes to a certain extent as to what is real and what is not. This is proven when Henry’s own son (who happens to be an android) persistently questions whether he is real or not: ‘You and I are real David’ explained Teddy (who also happens to be of artificial creation) in a programmed way, without thought or explanation. This, therefore, creates a world where things are seemingly flawless and completely unreal. For example, the first line of the series: ‘In Mrs Swinton’s garden, it was always summer. This world is very similar to that of the year 2000 film, The Matrix, in that everything seems perfect, but nothing is at it seems. Contrarily to what the world seems, the world is superficial and materialistic: ‘All were elegantly slender, despite the rich food and drink they were putting away’. This quote also shows the world to be very fake and artificial. It also shows the people of the world to be selfish and self-obsessed due to their need for beauty and perfection. This world is a way that Brian Aldiss has shown how science can have negative effects on society.

Join now!

The people of the world are also ignorant, inconsiderate, narrow minded, arrogant and insecure, due to the technology that has been introduced (the problems with science). ‘Though three quarters of the world are starving, we are lucky here to have more than enough thanks to population control’. This quote was taking from Henry Swinton’s corporate speech at the launch of a new android. The quote shows Swinton to be completely inconsiderate, selfish, ignorant and narrow minded, which are many of the problems previously highlighted of this technological world. If Swinton is as described, then forgiving generalisation and stereotypes, the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay