How do the poems Composed Upon Westminster Bridge, September 3, 1802(TM) by William Wordsworth and London(TM) by William Blake compare with each other?

Authors Avatar

Bharrathi Sarvananthan (11M1)        -  -        Pre-1914 Poetry Coursework essay

Pre-1914 Poetry Coursework

TASK: How do the poems ‘Composed Upon Westminster Bridge, September 3, 1802’ by William Wordsworth and ‘London’ by William Blake compare with each other?

        Both ‘Composed upon Westminster Bridge’ and London’ describe the city of London but from different perspectives and in different contexts. Both poems were written at the outset of the Industrial Revolution at a time when the British Empire was beginning to flourish. Wordsworth describes the beauty of the city and its river whilst the city is asleep, whereas Blake focuses more on the lives of the people in the city and the appalling conditions in which they must survive.

A notable difference between the two poems is their form and structure which, in turn, reflect their content. Wordsworth’s poem is presented in the form of a Petrachan/Italian sonnet and the enjambment of many of the lines reflects the free flowing, natural beauty of London and the Thames and the liberty which, according to Wordsworth, the people of London have to enjoy. It is also a reflection of the expansiveness of the city and London’s all-encompassing nature. Blake’s poem has a songlike quality to it and has a constrained form consisting of largely monosyllabic words, arranged into quatrains of regular rhythm. The form is reminiscent of one of the poem’s main themes; an attack on society and the institutions which place these hardships on its people. As well as a reflection of Blake’s belief that the people of London don’t actually have the freedoms which are described by Wordsworth.

Both poems share many themes but for each theme both poets take very different viewpoints. Wordsworth regards the city as being very wealthy in all manners and forms. The ships mentioned by Wordsworth are representative of the trade in London and the city’s general financial fortitude. The towers and the theatres express London’s cultural wealth which is gained through architecture and art. Finally temples are often a sign of spiritual affluence. However, for Blake, London is actually far from wealthy. The chimney-sweeper and the harlot are examples of typical Londoners who have ‘low base trades’ which would have been very low paid and generally frowned upon. The spiritual wealth, according to Blake, is non-existent as the church which is “blackening” into corruption restricts this. The “youthful Harlot’s curse” which “blasts the newborn Infant’s tear” shows how spiritual values have been compromised since the harlot can be seen to represent sexual corruption and the newborn infant to represent Jesus.

Join now!

Blake’s poem was part of his anthology entitled Songs of Innocence and Experience. This is one of his ‘songs’ of Experience and describes the city of London as if it was a sort of hell. This ethereal concept is brought out through his descriptions of institutions. The church is described as being “blackening” because the London air was sooty and because it failed to protect those good and pure values associated with the church (the exploitation of the poor and the children was permitted). In effect it marks the descent of the church into hypocrisy and corruption (black = ...

This is a preview of the whole essay