How Does Arthur Miller Make The End Of Act 4 Dramatically Effective?

Authors Avatar

Adam Smith                                                                                                         29/4/2004

How Does Arthur Miller Make The End Of Act 4 Dramatically Effective?

The Crucible is the story of how in 1692 a small girl created mass hysteria, resulting in the deaths of scores of innocent, upstanding people, including many of the main characters. Written in 1952, Miller used this play to show his opposition to McCarthyism, which he described as being “quite crazy”. Miller has mirrored himself in John Proctor, one of the victims in the play. McCarthyism was present in the late 1940s and early 50s, and, due to fears of communist power in the US, resulted in a few “Outrageously patriotic people,” Miller, running everything, allowed to investigate anyone for anything, usually with devastating consequences. Miller was given a book called “The Devil in Massachusetts”, which accounted this exact phenomenon occurring, but in the 15th century. He dramatised this into “The Crucible”, which sold millions of copies all over the world and has been staged countless times.

The 3 acts before 4 serve to build up the tension for the end of Act 4. In the first, we meet many of the main characters including Abigail, who takes advantage of the problem, though we don’t see how manipulative she can be until later on. The second act we see the whole ordeal spiralling out of control, as people try to find scapegoats to get themselves out of trouble, and probably death. The penultimate act emphasises how the entire affair is based on the truly tenuous ramblings of Abigail and her minions, and how the highest of people in society are falling into this trap. The final act can be seen metaphorically as the crucible; as the supposed witches are executed, for what they believe in: the truth and, like a crucible, the impurities are taken out. In this case, the victims are innocent, so the metaphor is an ironic one, with only the ignorant and thick skinned believing it by the end. This is happening even after it is realised by the fanatics that the whole situation is based on false grounds, not stopping so that their names weren’t tarnished.

There are many ways in which Miller makes the end of Act 4 dramatically effective, the dialogue that goes on between the characters being one of them. When Tituba is in the cells with Sarah Good, she begins calling out for the Devil to take her “home” – to Barbados, where she originated from. This being the exact opposite to what she should think with the madness of the Witch Trials, it demonstrates how the minds of many previously sane people have, in Tituba’s case, been manipulated into thinking that the devil really does exist, and is coming for her as her saviour. Also in the cells, you get a feeling that this act will be different from the crescendo of each of the other acts, when Tituba says “Wake up!” This gets the pace high much earlier on in the act in comparison to the other acts, which start to slow, then build up to a climax; act 4 seems to be nearer to the peak through most of it, started by this exclamation. This has connotations of greater drama during this act; a sort of foreshadowing.

Join now!

Later on in the act, Proctor is talking to his wife, Elizabeth, just before he is to be taken to the gallows. Throughout the play a sense of tension between them has been apparent, for example Proctor obviously not liking the food Elizabeth has cooked for him in act 1, but he secretly seasons it and compliments her on how tasty it is, just to satisfy her. The tension is because of Proctor, mid thirties, having an affair with Abigail previously, who was originally staged as a young teenager (made older in the play), and his guilt about that. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay