How does Arthur Miller present characters who engage the emotions of the audience of A View from the Bridge(TM)? To what extent are these characters trapped by their time and background?

Authors Avatar

How does Arthur Miller present characters who engage the emotions of the audience of ‘A View from the Bridge’? To what extent are these characters trapped by their time and background?

In this essay I will attempt to explain how Arthur Miller presents characters who engage the emotions of the audience of ‘A View from the Bridge’, and to what extent these characters are trapped by their time and background.

Alfieri is the chorus; he is there to explain the Sicilian culture to the Manhattan audience, and the play is based on Alfieri’s view of Eddie’s life. The audience at the time would be wealthy and would not have encountered most of the problems that the characters have to face on a daily basis. In this sense, Alfieri is describing another world; one that the audience does not understand.  He is one of the most important characters even though he is not one of the most prominent. Alfieri tells the story, and makes us empathise with the characters. Without him, we would never understand why Eddie has fallen in love with Catherine, and so we would just judge him and consider it wrong, but instead we feel sorry for him, and realise that he is also suffering. Many of the characters are incapable of telling us how they feel, so Alfieri also articulates their feelings for us. Without Alfieri, the audience would never be able to understand the social commitments and restrictions of the 1950s American society, for example, the position of women and the life of the poor. Although he is a lawyer, we are shown that he is also a mediator, between the Italian and American communities. This is because he understands both cultures, and can identify with each perspective. He also narrates the play in the past tense; this makes us realise that there is nothing we can do to help him. The play was written in a fatalistic tone to show us that the outcome is inevitable, and Eddie is doomed.

The genre of this play is obviously a tragedy, as it contains several typical conventions of Greek tragedy. In Greek tragedy, there must be a tragic hero – Eddie – with a tragic flaw (a weakness that the audience understands and can connect with) – Eddie’s love for Catherine. If the hero lives fully, he must always follow his heart, even if it means suffering not only for him but also for others. It also means that he will die at the end as a result of living fully, as he has to pay the price for his folly, and is bound by destiny. In this particular incident, we, the audience, understand how he cannot hide his feelings for Catherine, because we all know what it feels like to fall in love with someone we should not and we realise that he cannot help it. Miller uses these conventions of tragedy with a twentieth century man and not a King or God, which is usually the case, because he is trying to tell us that anyone can make a mistake ant that many of the problems that the prosperous encounter also affect those less fortunate than themselves, and to show us that people are not that different.

Eddie Carbone is the tragic hero. At the start of the play, he is shown to be the main character, and the man of the house; this is represented by the arm chair in the house, which acts as a sort of throne. He is a good man and a well-respected member of the community, as he works hard for his money and for his family. ‘He was as good a man as he had to be in a life that was hard and even. He worked on the piers when there was work, he brought home his pay, and he lived.’ (p15). He has looked after Catherine with his wife, since her mother died when she was young; this is another reason why people respect him, as he is not afraid to take on extra responsibilities for his family – family was a very important part of Italian society, and was second only to community values. In the house, he is respected, and his opinion valued. ‘You like it huh?’ (p5).  We are shown that his word is final, when Catherine is offered a job, and he tells her that she cannot go, but later changes his mind. ‘You can’t take no job! Why didn’t you ask me before you take no job?’ (p9). This shows that she was willing to give up the job, if Eddie did not approve of it.

Join now!

At the start of the play, we are shown that he has a special relationship with Catherine, and she will do anything to please him. He is a very cynical man, and likes to play the alpha male role, as he is very masculine. He would never betray anyone, because his Italian roots are very important to him, and most of the traditional values are very much a part of everyday life. Before Marco and Rodolfo arrive, Eddie warns Catherine not to mention that they are staying with them to anyone. ‘You – don’t-know-nothin’’ (p13) Just remember, kid, you ...

This is a preview of the whole essay