• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does J.B Priestley lay foundations for the downfall of the Birling Household within Act 1 of An Inspector Calls?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How does J.B. Priestly lay the foundations for Downfall of the Birling household in Act 1 of "An Inspector Calls"? Throughout act one of "An Inspector Calls" J.B. Priestly uses subtle techniques to give a sense of impending doom and downfall for the Birling household. He demonstrates the fact that the Birling family may well be headed for downfall with lots of techniques such as; the use of conflict within the household itself between the generally younger generation (with more of a community ethos which is more socialistic in its ideals) and the generally older generation (with capitalist, individualistic views which swing more towards the nationalist end of the scale) as well as the use of Birling and his na�ve, foolish, ignorant and closed minded views to the society of the time Birling is probably the biggest factor in the family's downfall. His naivety and foolishness are real problems, especially with him being at the head of the household. A great example of these traits comes when he says in one of his lengthy speeches at the dinner table, "we've passed the worst of it". Dramatic irony, which Priestley also uses to great effect, shows us just how wrong Birling is in this instance as the Great War is just about to start. Priestley uses dramatic irony in this case to demonstrate to the audience that disaster and indeed downfall are definitely looming over the household with a man like Birling who is so pompous, constantly wrong and stuck in his opinions at the helm and in full control. ...read more.

Middle

He also highlights the different approaches to responsibility within the household (older and younger generation) and could well represent the voice and the opinion of Priestley himself. When the inspector arrives at the Birling household he is described as making an "impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness". This is important because the "massiveness" and "solidity" implies that there is no getting round "purposefulness" of his enquiries. The stage directions also describe him as "looking hard at the person before actually speaking". The hardness of his stare links in with the harder light and the sheer harshness is enough to break through the "cozy" sense of security that the Birlings had before the arrival of the inspector. As well as being used to highlight conflicting views, stage directions are also used to create general presences about people. For example, a stage direction used for the inspector is for when he knocks on the door. The stage direction could describe the inspector just "knocking on the door" but instead we hear the "sharp ring of a door bell". This implies that the inspector will be harsh and concise. Also that he is quite clever and it will be difficult to get around him and his enquiries as he is "sharp". The inspector builds relationships with individual characters through the play, and they become more defined and easier to read as the play goes on. His relationship with Birling is mainly one of argument. Birling's views conflict the most with the inspector. The inspector does not agree with Birling's capitalist views as he doesn't like the way that the capitalist ideas look out for "oneself". ...read more.

Conclusion

Whilst they are both smoking, they are also drinking port and whisky. Both of the drinks are from a decanter, and if you look through a decanter, what you see on the other side is never what it really looks like in real life. Therefore, I think that the alcohol (and even the glassware that the alcohol is poured from) further symbolizes Birling and Gerald's lack of foresight. Another symbol used is the lighting in the room. At the start of the play "the lighting should be pink and intimate" this represents the Birlings feelings of security in their home, even if it is a false sense of security. This false sense of security is underlined when the inspector arrives and the stage directions proclaim that "it (the light) should be brighter and harder". This new brighter, harder light represents the light of truth which is set to expose the Birlings and what they have all done. So to conclude, I think that Priestley lays the foundations for an inevitable downfall right from the off. Priestley's use of Birling is the biggest contributor to the downfall of the household in my opinion as with such a fool at the head of the household something is bound to go wrong. The lack of unity is also another enormous factor, and tension between the household before the inspector even arrives is also another important factor but I think that the foundations are definitely laid in the first few pages of the script. There is a sense of downfall right from the beginning and in my opinion, Priestley makes it more of a case of when and how it will happen, rather than whether it actually will. ALEX BABB ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How does Priestley create dramatic tension in Act 1 of An Inspector Calls up ...

    3 star(s)

    the men are in tails and white ties" This implies a sense of formality within the family, which again makes the setting less home-like and comfortable; suggesting that the characters may all be very distant from each other. It also suggests how wealth can make people feel uncomfortable and is another physical reminder that materialism does not bring happiness.

  2. Discussion on "An Inspector Calls" by J.B. Priestley.

    The Inspectors entry to the play was very Ironic, as Mr Birling selfishly said, "...a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own-and-," the Inspectors call stopped Birling from saying any further of his speech and the irony is that the Inspector carries on

  1. An Inspector Calls. Explore the social and political views of the Birlings and the ...

    Birling tries to laugh off the difficult situations in comparison to Sheila and Eric, who take things more seriously. Birling cares of what the public think of him. He is scared of what people's reactions will be toward the Birlings when all the lies and deceit have been unwrapped and the truth is revealed to the public.

  2. Essay on "An Inspector Calls" by J.B. Priestley

    However then in methodical order skipping Eric's crime and purposely moving onto Mrs Birlings crime because of another unusual tactic Inspector Goole conducts while interviewing a character. He lets them talk big of them selves (usually in opposite or against the crime they've committed), "building up a wall that is

  1. Directors notes and stage instructions for An Inspector Calls

    of the 'strong' disinfectant that she drank, which 'burn her inside out'. He could have course stopped there, but instead carried on to describe the great agony in which she died and how nothing could be done for her. This immediately makes the audience feel compassion for the dead girl

  2. How does JB Priestley expound his views of social hypocrisy in An Inspector Calls?

    As the Birlings house opens the Birlings look oversized in their house which symbolises they are bigger than everyone else. The only room we see is the dining room this is because the play is set in the Birlings dining room.

  1. "You and I aren't the same people who sat down together before dinner" Sheila ...

    Inspector is not real and soon he has managed to put the whole episode out of his head, despite protests from Eric and Sheila who try to tell him that "you still haven't learnt anything.� Birling is far more concerned about what may happen if the news comes out in

  2. 1st draft How does J B Priestly use the characters in Act Three of ...

    As the Inspector is drawing his investigation to a close he addresses the family, he is less stern towards Sheila than to Mr Birling because Sheila is showing remorse for what she has done and wishes that she had not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work