• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does J.B Priestley use 'An Inspector Calls' as a vehicle to express social and moral concerns?

Extracts from this document...


How does J.B Priestley use 'An Inspector Calls' as a vehicle to express social and moral concerns? 'An Inspector Calls' was written by J.B. Priestley at the end of World War Two (1945) to express discontent regarding social barriers. The war had softened the 'walls' separating the classes because people were combined, working towards a shared aim. The war had brought women's responsibility into society; the nation was bonded because of the common enemy and the Welfare State was being established, thus creating more equality. People wanted life to remain unprejudiced. Surely the war had been fought for more than triumph but for a new balance in humanity? The play therefore carries a strong political agenda. The conclusion and moral message is to be considerate to others and distribute responsibility: which of course is a socialist motivation. The play is arranged in the pattern of an orthodox detective mystery: a standard exterior, but in fact it delivers a compelling moral theme. The drama is entirely performed in the dining room of the Birlings' family property, in the suburbs of an industrial city: Brumley. Priestley initially detaches the audience of 1945 by use of the period costume of 1912. This ingenious ploy initially makes it difficult to identify with a specific character. ...read more.


The name 'Eva Smith' shows just how much she could have been anybody; in the sense that if we all work together anybody can be capable of anything. The other characters in the play are also representations: - Birling is a limited man and is wrong about many things in the play. He is a terribly pompous, na�ve character, who likes to make speeches. He has a-lot of false optimism, is incredibly ambitious and socially pretentious. Priestley describes him on the stage as a 'rather portentous man', full of self-importance and greed. He twice mentions his far from definite knighthood as a way of impressing Gerald. Gerald Croft considers himself a good match for Sheila, he is an aristocrat who contradicts the whole moral significance of the play: by implying that if one is sufficiently respectable one is above crime. I think these two characters (as well as Mrs Birling) represent the upper class and perhaps, the capitalists. Sheila, Birling's daughter and Gerald's fianc�e is more perceptive than the other characters and she has the potential to develop a moral conscience, which is conveyed when she first senses the abnormal power of the inspector. Progressively throughout the play Sheila develops from an inexperienced juvenile, into a modern woman with the power to make her own decisions. ...read more.


They are the only two who have fully understood the depth of their behaviour. Sheila frantically pleads with the other characters to feel remorse for their actions but with no success, she admits defeat. The phone rings and they are told to expect the call of an inspector. All had not fully learnt the lesson and so must face their fate: of which the Inspector warned them. Only two of five people had learnt the moral message, and so the play ends leaving the audience to speculate about how this moral lesson can be applied to their own lives. The majority of the characters had missed the whole point of collective responsibility and therefore, in my opinion have got what they deserved. In a conventional mystery, the plot gets clearer and clearer until the conclusion where the murderer is revealed. Here, there is an inspector; we take him to be an inspector. There is a crime. We expect a conclusion, a 'round up' of the events that have occurred. But at the very end, we realise everything we have taken for real and unfeigned is not. In a typical detective drama, a single culprit separates the guilty and the innocent. Here, this does not apply; and this conveys the need for joint responsibility in this sort of crime; and as a result is very significant in every society. 1Lucy Tyler ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. Discussthe role of the Inspector in the play 'An Inspector Calls'

    This highlights the domestic tensions between the Birlings. A family bond is based on materialistic factors such as money and social status. There is no suggestion that affection exists within the family. "An impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness," is the initial and complete description of the inspector.

  2. How does the character of Sheila Change during the course of J.B. Preistely's "Inspector ...

    no death or unborn life on her conscience but the rest of Sheila's family still don't care about Eva Smith, they only care that they is no public scandal. Mr Birling told Sheila that it was all over, Sheila says that everything did really happen but it didn't end in

  1. How does Priestley use the Inspector as a dramatic device in "An Inspector Calls", ...

    Without the Inspector's 'purposefulness', each character could not or would not have acknowledged their behavior. The Inspector's somber appearance and the news he brings are a contrast with the happy and elegant air of celebration on stage. His name, Goole (ghoul?), gives him a mysterious, disturbing quality - a ghoul

  2. In Act One of "An Inspector Calls", how does J.B. Priestley use dramatic devices ...

    It leaves the audience wondering whether the inspector does already know, and whether Sheila's premonitions about him are correct, something that the audience will only find out in the next act.

  1. How does JB Priestley expound his views of social hypocrisy in An Inspector Calls?

    The worlds developing so fast that it'll make war impossible.' He is ridiculing the prospect of war when the audience knows that there have been not one but two wars. Mr Birling then says 'the titanic. And unsinkable'. The audience also know that the titanic sank.

  2. Essay on "An Inspector Calls" by J.B. Priestley

    When Birling proudly said he plays golf with the "chief inspector," the Inspector "dryly," said, "I don't play golf," understating and ignoring Birlings relation with the chief inspector. This shows the Inspector isn't corrupt and will not budge, not even for the chief inspector, creating drama, suspense, and making the Birling's and Gerald very anxious.

  1. "An Inspector Calls", by J.B Priestley - review

    This similarity could just be a mere coincidence, but I think it is a metaphor, used to describe the Inspector's mystical character in short. - Ghouls by legend are mysterious, magical creatures that are associated with death; and through this comparison, (plus the Inspector's style of just appearing with immediate authority), the same can be said about him.

  2. How does J B Priestley use the Inspector as a voice for social change?

    The Inspectors blunt manner is used to show how he doesn?t want to sympathise with the family. Priestley creates Mr Birling?s character like this to represent the capitalist views on society and how you should always think about the consequences of your actions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work