"How does Jane Austen comment to her readers on the concept of a good marriage in 'Pride and Prejudice'?"

Authors Avatar

English Coursework Essay                 Tanya Sen

                10JA

Pride and Prejudice: Coursework Essay

Draft 1

How does Jane Austen comment to her readers on the concept of a good marriage in ‘Pride and Prejudice’?”

By Tanya Sen

“It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.” In the very first sentence, Jane Austen neatly paraphrases the main theme of Pride and Prejudice with a satirical comment on marriage in society of the time.

The book remains, till today, one of the most acclaimed works of English literature because it provides a clever caricature of society at the time, and an ironic comment on how peoples’ lives revolved so wholly around marriage. Despite being, as Austen herself puts it, ‘light, and bright, and sparkling’, Pride and Prejudice has a key message to convey which is not lost out even in all the humour.

The plot seems to suggest that at the time, marriage was viewed as an end objective, and the ultimate accomplishment- unlike modern society, where marriage is thought of as more of a journey. Everyone has the final motive of matrimony; this is the purpose for which Mr. Collins goes to Longbourn, for example.

The fact that books at the time usually ended with the marriage of the main characters emphasized this point further. Contrary to this, today we might find books that begin with a marriage, and the rest of the book might explore the success of the marriage itself rather than the success of the events that lead up to engagement.  

The book gives us a snapshot of life for the middle and the upper classes in Georgian times. Perhaps Austen wrote about these classes because she was more familiar with them, but also because these classes had some social mobility. It may have been irregular, but it wasn’t scandalous for someone to marry slightly above his or her rank. It could be considered prejudiced (and therefore hypocritical of the author) not to depict the working class at all, but this class had no social mobility at all so writing a book about their marriages would have been far beyond Austen’s time.

Typical to novels at the time, in true fairy-tale style, the book ends with love and marriage (although it begins with pride, prejudice and general discord). Contrary to this, today we would be likely to find novels that explore the actual marriage itself, and how successful it has been.

Pride and Prejudice has quite a simple plot, which allows for the involvement of various couples- as an example of each gradation of success in marriage. The major matrimonies are of the protagonist, Elizabeth Bennet, and of a rich gentleman, Mr. Darcy. The marriage of Jane Bennet and Mr. Bingley (who is a close friend of Mr. Darcy) is also important to the message that Austen is trying to convey. However, the Bennet marriage and the matrimony of Charlotte and Mr. Collins also are important to the idea of what makes a couple successful. However, these couples are highlighted for negative rather than positive reasons.

The union of Darcy and Elizabeth is a direct illustration of the idea that ‘opposites attract’. Yet, despite being so utterly contrasting, essentially both characters share the admirable traits of wit and intelligence. And even in their differences, their two characters complement one another. What Elizabeth lacks- calmness and perspective- Darcy has. And Elizabeth’s sense of fun is good for Darcy, who is generally so shy that he is mistaken as being haughty and overly swollen with self-importance.

It is important to observe that Austen’s character development were probably more mature than general novels of the time. There doesn’t seem to be a distinct division in the characters; nobody is decidedly ‘bad’ or decidedly ‘good’. They are instead portrayed in more grayish shades. The classic example, of course, is Elizabeth and Darcy’s infamous pride and prejudice, despite their being the supposedly ideal couple.  The scene is far more realistic than the typical Gothic romances of the time; it shows a snapshot of everyday life, with human characters who have faults as well.

In the beginning of the book, both Elizabeth and Darcy are wrought with pride and prejudice. Darcy’s superior upbringing gives him an intense pride that makes him strongly prejudiced against Elizabeth’s inferior social status. On at first slighting Elizabeth as of merely ‘tolerable’ beauty and of not being ‘handsome enough to tempt’ him, Darcy wounded her pride, and provided the seeds for prejudice against him, a prejudice that was so strong a feeling that it would later prove hard to erase.

Darcy is the first one that begins to admit his admiration for Elizabeth; even though for a long time he seems to be in denial because his pride cautions him against loving a woman who is of a lower social standing. And even though people around him (like jealous Ms. Bingley) start noticing Darcy’s growing admiration for Elizabeth, her own prejudice blinds her from seeing his regard for her. Despite her strong character, pride is the trait that clouds her judgment. It is this pride that makes her refuse to see Darcy’s true nature, and the same pride that is flattered by Wickham seeking her special attention, cunningly relating to her far-fetched tales that were created merely to induce sympathy. Elizabeth’s family pride prevents her from letting anyone else ‘speak ill’ of her family, although she herself realizes their shortcomings; a fact that is evident when we see how she ‘blushed and blushed again with shame and vexation’ when Mrs. Bennet ventured to give her embarrassing opinions. Darcy’s personal pride also gives him a subconscious feeling of self-importance, and this is reflected in everything he does, especially in his proposal to Elizabeth. The two characters themselves unconsciously give a snapshot of this during their conversation in Netherfield, when Elizabeth accuses Darcy of having a ‘propensity to hate everybody’, to which Darcy retorts that her defect was ‘wilfully to misunderstand them’.

This mutual pride and prejudice makes the couple misjudge each other for most of the story, but they later succumb to the ‘gradual process of falling in love’, and the book ends with their marriage.

If Darcy had been a typical gentleman of the time, he would have felt it his duty to marry someone of equal stature to him in society. Although he did not fulfill this feeling in the end, throughout the book it was Elizabeth’s lower class that worried him. Ms. Bingley, knowing this, tried her hardest to emphasize Elizabeth’s inferiority and her own superiority. Darcy had the perceptiveness to see through Ms. Bingley’s schemes quite early on in the book. Ms. Bingley is distinctly obnoxious in her hypocrisy. Although she seizes every opportunity to slight Elizabeth’s lack of class, her own money came from the much-scorned source of ‘trade’. Her criticism of Elizabeth rises only from a source of deep jealousy, since she wants to marry Darcy herself.

The woman constantly makes covert and not quite so subtle attempts to gain Darcy’s attention and prevent him (unsuccessfully) from liking Elizabeth. Ms. Bingley herself, however, she isn’t in the least in love with Darcy, but is solely after his wealth. Her shallowness of character and vanity make her refuse to see that her constant flirting doesn’t at all sway Darcy.

Join now!

When Elizabeth walks three miles to see her sick sister at Netherfield (meanwhile getting dirty and muddy), Ms. Bingley thought it was a scandalous, unladylike act and showed an

abominable sort of conceited independence’.

However, ultimately Darcy remained unconvinced despite this constant disparagement- although he maintains that Elizabeth’s manners are ‘not those of the fashionable world’, it was this very independent spirit of hers that seemed to appeal to him. Openness is the one trait that Darcy himself lacks. Perhaps this is why he admires Elizabeth specially, although he is generally so proud that he is quite hard ...

This is a preview of the whole essay