How does Miller present the relationship between Proctor and Elizabeth in Acts 2 and 4?

Authors Avatar

Milandra McGrath 10v                                                   21st November 06

How does Miller present the relationship between Proctor and Elizabeth in Acts 2 and 4?

The Crucible, a play written about the mass hysteria which led to the Salem witch trials was inspired by the mass hysteria of the anti-communism crusade in the early 1950s. John and Elizabeth Proctor’s characters were loosely based on real people and events. Miller presents to the audience Proctor and Elizabeth’s moral journey, which ends with Proctor dying with a clear conscience and a purified soul. Some of the techniques Miller uses to present their relationship are through dramatic irony, use of space and format of speech.

When Proctor and Elizabeth’s relationship is introduced in Act 2 Miller immediately creates a sense of their disparity for the audience. From the brief scene setting that Act 2 begins with, signs of their fragile and reserved relationship is shown. Within this initial paragraph Miller describes Proctor tasting Elizabeth’s food, not being content with it, and so as a result seasons it with salt. We later see Proctor complimenting Elizabeth on the food, ‘It’s well seasoned’. Proctor compliments Elizabeth although he, and the audience, knows that it was not Elizabeth’s good cooking, which was responsible for the good taste. Miller is using dramatic irony here to show that with something so trivial there is still dishonesty between them; this is what has led to a breakdown of trust. 

This action of Proctor seasoning the food does not just tell the reader that he does not like Elizabeth’s cooking. The meaning of this sentence can be developed, and deeper meanings about the couple’s relationship can be derived. Proctor wants more flavour in his food, which suggests he also needs more flavour and excitement in his life; whereas Elizabeth has a plainer taste, and this therefore shows how her life is lacking flavour and quite bland. The extremities of their personalities seem to be separating Proctor and Elizabeth further and further apart. Miller’s idea of their opposite personalities was that Elizabeth needed to tame Proctor and relieve him of his appetite.

Join now!

The blandness of Elizabeth is shown by many ways throughout this act. The earliest illustration of this is again in the brief paragraph at the beginning of the scene. In the time the play is set it was common for a women’s domain to be in the home, so the fact that Elizabeth’s home is so dull is reflective of her personality, ‘It is the low, dark, and rather long living room of the time’. The appearance of their home is brought up later in the act, when Proctor suggests the idea of Elizabeth bringing some flowers into the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay