How Does Priestly Build Up Tension at the ends of Acts 1 and 2 in An Inspector Calls?

Authors Avatar

How Does Priestly Build Up Tension at the ends of Acts 1 and 2 in An Inspector Calls?

An Inspector Calls was written by J.B. Priestly in the 1940’s. It is set in 1912 the week the Titanic sunk. It is about an upper class family who are celebrating their daughter, Sheila’s engagement to Gerald Croft. An Inspector Goole arrives and begins to question them in relation to a girl who committed suicide. It turns out that they are all linked with the girl and have contributed in some way to her death. The Inspector then exits leaving the Birling family somewhat confused and perplexed. A phone call to the nearest police station reveals that there is no Inspector of the name Goole. The family now incredibly relived but still very confused begin to relax when the phone rings and a voice on the end tells them of a suicide and that an Inspector is on his way.

        

The play gives a good insight into Priestly’s political views on society at that time. It also gives a good example of the class system in 1912. This is shown in Mr. Birling’s lines on page ten.

Birling: the way some of these cranks talk and write now, you’d think everybody has to look after everybody else, as if we were all mixed up together like bees in a hive – community and all that nonsense… a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own.

When he speaks of “cranks”, he is talking about socialists of the time who were very much in the minority. Priestly was obviously of the socialist viewpoint as is demonstrated in the Inspectors speech on page 56.

Inspector: One Eva Smith has gone – but there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us… We don’t live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other. And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish.

In this Priestly is talking about the general society and also the fire, blood and anguish of the First World War which the country was soon to enter at that time. The play was written in the 1940’s in the middle of another World War. It is almost a warning about entering another war and what can try to be done about it.

The play is set all in the same timescale except for after the interval. Each scene and act begins where the last one left off and the audience watch it in the same time that it is being acted in. After the interval, the play returns to the end of the last act. This helps the play to retain its tension as the audience are watching it as a production in real time.

Priestly uses many techniques to build up tension at the ends of Acts 1 and 2. These include, the control of the plot and what is released when, character relationships and development, dramatic irony, pauses, many questions asked especially in the audiences minds, cliff hangers are used as endings to the acts and also leaving the ends open for interpretation. Priestly uses these techniques very well and wisely as the play shows.    

When Act 1 begins, the family are celebrating Sheila Birling’s engagement to Gerald Croft. The characters are all very friendly and have very good relationships. Sheila is very close to both her parents, she calls her parent’s mummy and daddy showing that she is quite immature and hasn’t really grown up. On page two, “Yes go on Mummy,” and on page six, “I’m sorry, Daddy.” After the Inspector arrives and begins to question each character, they all begin to develop their own views on the case. More tension begins to build between Sheila and her parents, which is reflected in the way she speaks to them. “I’ve told my father – he didn’t think it amounted to much;” the way she said she told, her father, rather than said or mentioned as she may have done before shows her increasing beliefs, status and power. She goes against Mr. Birling’s morals and opinions when she says, “But these girls aren’t just cheap labour – their people.”

As early as page three some tension begins to develop between Sheila and Gerald. Sheila is only half serious when she says, “all last summer, when you never came near me, and I wondered what had happened to you.” She suspects slightly that Gerald was seeing someone else but is really just teasing him. The relationship changes again when Sheila says, “I expect you’ve done things you’re ashamed of too,” and Gerald replies, “Well, I never said I hadn’t. I don’t see why-” Gerald almost sounds guilty and tense at this point and when the Inspector cuts in; “Never mind about that. You can settle that between you later;” Priestly has used foreboding to give the audience an insight into what might occur between them later. Sheila becomes slowly the more powerful of them and uses her influence at the end of the act.

Join now!

Eric and Mr. Birling’s relationship also changes throughout this scene. On page ten when Birling and Gerald are joking about whether, “Eric’s been up to something,” Eric becomes very uneasy and tells them, “Well I don’t think it’s very funny.” Birling becomes quite suspicious and says sharply, “What’s the matter with you?” Eric becomes quite defiant when he says, “Nothing.” The relationship has already begun to breakdown creating some tension for the audience to watch. Later on in the Act, Eric argues with his father and disagrees about whether he should have sacked Eva Smith. “Why shouldn’t they try ...

This is a preview of the whole essay