• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Shakespeare present tension

Extracts from this document...


How does Shakespeare present tension Shakespeare presents the tensions between Civilisation and Nature through the way in which the settlers interact with one another, through the relationship between the natives of the Island and the settlers, through the way in which Shakespeare presents characteristics in both Prospero and Caliban which oppose the generalisations of civilised society and through the play's historical link to the Colonisation of America. The generalisations of Civilised society were that the "savages" of the 'new world' were brutal and needlessly violent, viewed as inferior by the standards set by a 'civilised' moral bound society. However, through the use of the characters Prospero and Caliban, Shakespeare upturns these generalisations by revealing traits of each character that contrast surprisingly to their stereotypes. Caliban is presented by Prospero and Miranda to be a foul beast "not honoured with a human shape" of which "any print of goodness will not take" and the audience immediately accepts their description of him because they are disgusted by his attempted rape of Miranda and especially by his lack of guilt, "o ho would't have been done!". By this Shakespeare is presenting how Caliban is so emotionally uneducated he is by presenting him as wild and immoral in a world where there is no social code. Caliban feels strongly for Miranda, her being the only female on the Island besides Sycorax and registers her beauty, "she as far surpasseth Sycorax" however does not have the language or understanding to express this in any form other than by animal instinct. ...read more.


The enslavement however would seem justified to an Elizabethan audience who would look upon Caliban, because he is a witch's son, as unworthy of anything than to serve Prospero. However, in Caliban's evident desire to usurp Prospero and in his constant rebellion, Shakespeare undermines the idea and presents an opinion contrary to the general attitude of the time as Caliban responds, "This Island's mine, by Sycorax my mother". Possession by way of inheritance although sensible in the "natural" order of things differs greatly to that of the arrogant claims upon discovery which the early settlers such as Prospero practiced. Prospero enslaved not only Caliban but all the spirits of the Island too are shown to be at his command. Prospero is illustrated as almost God-like in his demonstration of power. Caliban "must obey, his art is of such power... control Setebos". Again a direct link to the natives of the 'new world' as Setebos is a god of the south American Indians, the Patagonians. Prospero's comparison to God is also highlighted when Ferdinand speaks of Ariel, "it waits upon some God o' th' island" and at the end of the play when Gonzalo thanks the gods for they "have chalked forth the way which brought us hither". However he is actually describing what Prospero has done. Shakespeare may be using these comparisons to please a sixteenth century monarchy which was supposedly chosen by God, or to simply emphasize the amount of power Prospero has obtained under his pitiless command. ...read more.


Gonzalo would have "use of service, none", "no occupation" but rather live innocently with nature bringing "forth of its own kind, all foison..." Shakespeare uses the structure of the speech, interrupted continuously by Antonio and Sebastian, to perhaps mock the idea and highlight its faults. The idea itself comes from a French philosopher who describes how the Europeans corrupted America with its advanced influence. Through Sebastian and Antonio, Shakespeare is undermining his words and this implies that his own opinion could be that nature and civilisation can never both exist without the differences or hostility between the two. I believe Shakespeare presents the tensions between Civilisation and Nature not as to highlight their difference, but rather to highlight the tension that is created by society's denial in their similarities. Perhaps the repulsion of Caliban is seen as a rejection of each of the more civilised characters untamed selves, their more 'sophisticated' selves portrayed as wit, cunning or power. By this, I could say that Shakespeare is presenting Caliban as the only true character in the whole play, though coarse and unrefined he is evidently not a master of politics or scheming, such as the characters of Antonio and Sebastian, which has been learnt through the highest classes of civilised society. In this, Shakespeare is saying that both nature and civilisation are equal, the only difference being that nature is not in a state of self denial. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE The Tempest section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE The Tempest essays

  1. How does Shakespeare present the falling in love of Ferdinand and Miranda in a ...

    When Ferdinand first sees her, he thinks she is a goddess; both astounded by her beauty and helped by the music playing in the background. While it is Ariel who is orchestrating the meeting and 'setting the scene', this would create a rather romantic and warm atmosphere for the audience.

  2. In what ways does Prospero use (and abuse) his power? Has he learned anything ...

    As a result of this, Prospero made Caliban his slave and treated him as an animal. This is closely linked to power and colonisation, as Prospero has taken the ownership of the island which Caliban once had and turned him into his slave.

  1. Explore Shakespeare's presentation of Caliban in The Tempest. How far do you accept that ...

    His spirits hear me, and yet I needs must curse. But they'll nor pinch, fright me with urchin-shows, pitch me i'th' mire, nor lead me, like a firebrand in the dark, out of my way unless he bid 'em. But for every trifle are they set upon me: sometime like

  2. Shakespeare has made Caliban the most violent and savage character, but has also given ...

    Prospero which again emphasises the power Prospero has over Caliban and therefore reflects on how he treats Caliban. Act 3 scene 2, Caliban speaks about getting revenge on Prospero. He outlines a plot to kill him. This is shown through the language spoken by Caliban, "when Prospero is destroyed," The atmosphere created here is unpleasant.

  1. How does Shakespeare present the falling in love of Ferdinand and Miranda in a ...

    Similarly, although this must not be overstated, the scene the scene with Ferdinand's sword and Prospero's wand seem to be some type of mach, phallic symbols of male conflict. Prospero gets specifically angry when Ferdinand ignores him, as reflected by 'one more word' and 'I charge thee, that thou attend me'.

  2. How does the relationship between Prospero and Ariel change during the tempest

    When she says she wants to make her blood thick, (this is said to show she doesn't want blood to her heart, the centre of emotions), or she wants spirits to make her milk to gall (to get rid of a nurturing aspect, to care for her children)

  1. Tempest - What do we learn about Antonio and Sebastian so far in ...

    to sleep too, which portrays Sebastian as being quite a sophisticated character: "SEBASTIAN: Why, Doth it not then our eyelids sink?" Antonio is a character that can persuade Sebastian to do almost anything he wants him to do. In this case, Antonio is trying to persuade Sebastian, to let him help Sebastian to become King, and this even includes murder.

  2. Compare, contrast and evaluate different filmic, dramatic, stage-historical, literary critical and artistic interpretations of ...

    the proper way to play the islander, saying that those who had Caliban speak in a different way to Prospero and Miranda were mistaking "brutality of sentiment for uncouthness of words", showing a development of critical opinion from John Dryden who in his work 'The Character of Caliban' in 1679

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work