• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Stevenson present the duality of man

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How does Stevenson present the duality of man in the novel Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde This Gothic Horror follows the story from Mr Utterson's view. As he tries to discover the relationship between Dr Henry Jekyll and Edward Hyde. The story is developed through his conversations and letters. In all characters met in the story, the duality of man is shown by their reactions and what they say and backgrounds of the main characters. An example of this in a character not main, is the officer in the Danvers Carew murder case. At first he is shocked at who's been killed "Good God, Sir!" but then "his eyes lighted up with professional ambition" the realisation that this is a high profile case and so be good for his career if he solves it. In that showing us his 'other side' he doesn't matter that someone is dead as long as it helps his career, he shows a selfish side to him. ...read more.

Middle

if dead "to be destroyed unread" extending to more secrecy. Also at one point describing the streets as "labyrinths" almost saying the path/ route isn't clear. The duality of man is hinted at through the corner of the street on which the front of Jekyll's residence and the neglected, "blistered and distained" place Hyde stayed. The two properties connected via a courtyard. This showing that behind the two different fronts is the same thing (same person). The relationship between Jekyll and Hyde is the main mystery of the story. The potion is Jekyll's way of escaping from his respectable self to go out and enjoy the pleasure of which would ruin him if people knew. This is a big thing because in the Victorian era it was practically every thing, if someone found out about unrespectable things, it would spread and everyone would know, so you wouldn't be allowed certain places as people would want to be associated with that person. ...read more.

Conclusion

He could then carry out actions/pleasures without his reputation been affected if he was caught as he would not be recognised. Things such as murder someone they hate, or just for fun, sexual pleasure prostitutes, rent boys or even rape, however Stevenson doe not reveal to the reader what Jekyll/Hyde actually do, its left to the readers imagination. Stevenson quite frequently hints at the duality of man, some quite subtle, on the other hand he comes out with it in a bold way at one point of the novel. In Jekyll's full statement of the case he says "Man is not truly one, but truly two." The duality theory is definitely revealed, however he does go on to say "Others will follow, others will outstrip me on the same lines; and I hazard a guess that man will be ultimately known for a mere polity of multifarious, incongruous and independent denizens"- we are a wide variety of personalities not always matching with each other but we live as one person, we are truly many. Daniel Murray ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Robert Louis Stevenson section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The candidate response well to the question but has trouble expressing themselves clearly. This is why I rated the essay with three stars. It has the makings of an essay that can score many more mars if the candidate worked ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The candidate response well to the question but has trouble expressing themselves clearly. This is why I rated the essay with three stars. It has the makings of an essay that can score many more mars if the candidate worked in the Quality of Written Communication. In terms of content, there are a number of themes and presentations of the duality of man that are recognised, from something small as a minor character like a policeman to Dr. Jekyll himself. For future reference, I would advise that the candidate comment on the most important symbol of the themes first (Jekyll and Hyde, in this case) and then work their way to the least significant, as this essay does appear to be written on it's head, with the analysis of minor characters first; it just feel like the essay gets off to a very clunky and disjointed start because with minor characters, there is so little to write about that a whole paragraph consists of three of them and none are linked in the same way Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's relationship (which changes frequently) can be commented on.

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis is fair. It's a case of being too broad and not deep enough. There is plenty of content to satisfy the question, but the amount of content has limited the extent to which each piece of analysis can thoroughly be analysed. That is to say that there are some parts of the analysis that are worth spending more time on than the minor characters, however relevant. If there is more to say on one specific topic than another, then go for the former.
Where this candidate goes quite off the mark is where they begin to talk about secrecy and privacy. The analysis shown here is wholly accurate and would serve well if the question proposed had asked for it. As it is, the question does not ask for such analysis and therefore very few marks can be gained here if at all. It is absolutely imperative that candidate adhere to the question, regardless of what interesting pieces of analysis they want to show the examiner; if the question asks for the theme of the duality of Man, then do not talk about the recurrent motif of secrecy.

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication here is extremely poor, to the point that is becomes quite a task to read. The main issue here is that this candidate appears to write as they would speak. The difference between the two is not often stressed enough and candidates should never write as they would speak. There are subordinate clauses dotted all over the place; the answer is littered with comma splice and misuses of grammar, punctuation and spelling. It is simply not acceptable to see such poor QWC at GCSE grade. I recommend this candidate stop after every sentence and ensure that they have contained between a capital letter and a full stop, all the is required for a coherent, cohesive sentence (subject, verb, object being the bare necessities to make a cohesive sentence).


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 10/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Robert Louis Stevenson essays

  1. In the novel, Treasure Island, Jim Hawkins experiences a relationship with Long John Silver ...

    Jim hears that Silver killed Alan and then he witnesses him cruelly killing Tom. Jim becomes fearful of Silver, as he begins to think that Silver may murder him and he said "might not I come next?" At this point in the story, Jim shows hatred towards Silver after his murderous acts.

  2. “Dr. Jekyll deserves our sympathy – he is a victim of Victorian Values.” Discuss.

    One morning, he woke up, half transformed, with the body of Edward Hyde, and the hand of Henry Jekyll. He had gone to bed as Jekyll, and woken as Hyde, and had taken no potion in the meantime. Jekyll was scared, 'the balance of my nature might be permanently overthrown,

  1. Examine what you think to be some of the underlying thematic concerns of Stevenson's ...

    The same type of contrast is made, more importantly with Jekyll's house; it is described as a house that "bore in every feature the marks of a prolonged and sordid negligence". In contrast to the disrespectful neighbourhood it stood in, Jekyll's house was more than a house; it was in parallel to the Jekyll/Hyde relationship.

  2. Chapter 1: Story of the Door

    The street is described as merely an anonymous street in London, whose shop fronts "like rows of smiling women" have a brightness that stands out in contrast to the dingy neighborhood. And yet on this street, two doors from the corner, stands a dreary, Gothic house, which "bore in every feature the marks of prolonged and sordid negligence."

  1. Man is not truly two, but truly one

    Jekyll calls Hyde purely evil, but there is evidence suggesting that Jekyll's theory is flawed and that Hyde is actually a mixture of good and evil. When Jekyll characterizes Hyde as wholly evil Jekyll prefaces his statement by stating that it is based on his personal "theory alone" (58).

  2. How does Stevenson explore the theme of duality in Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde?

    The book: 'The strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde' addresses a numberous number of themes and not just about the simple good and evil of Victorian society at the time. Victorian life was usually inclined to be very dualistic, with its profound social prospects, which were placed on important members of society such as doctors like Dr Jekyll.

  1. How does the author make use of drama and suspense effectively, in "The ...

    As the doctor frets over what he might have to do if a patient in need of a complex operation were to require his help, the reader can almost predict what the rest of the story has in store. However this does not bore the reader.

  2. " How effective is the setting in creating tension and suspense in Stevenson's works?"

    At one point in the story, Mr. Utterson is looking for Mr Hyde and the book mentions that he looks for him "at night under the face of the fogged city moon." This creates tension because it suggests that people would not be out late at night and the "fogged city" is giving the reader a sense

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work