• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Stuart Burge's production of "Julius Caesar" dramatise the rhetorical effect of Brutus' and Antony's speeches in Act 3 Scene 2? Why is this scene dramatically important to the play as a whole?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How does Stuart Burge's production of "Julius Caesar" dramatise the rhetorical effect of Brutus' and Antony's speeches in Act 3 Scene 2? Why is this scene of dramatically important to the play as a whole? In Act 3 Scene 2, two very dramatic speeches are made by Brutus and Antony. In this scene, Brutus makes a speech trying to reason with the citizens and also to convince them that Caesar was a tyrant. In Antony's speech, he tries to reverse Brutus' persuasive speech by undermining him and reasons for his actions. Antony does this by cunningly leading the Romans to rage and mutiny. This scene is the most significant in the play because it is very dramatic for both Brutus and Antony. Brutus divides his speech into a series of rules and conventions of Rhetoric. He divides them into 5 steps. The Beginning the purpose of which is to prepare the audience with interest. This is then followed by the Exposition in which informs the audience on topics, deeds and events. The Explanation comes next and tells the audience about the purpose of the case and the Argument is to support the speaker's case. The Final Flourish is the conclusion. I think that this is a good way to make a speech because it is very well structured and easy to understand and follow because the citizens were mainly uneducated. ...read more.

Middle

I think that this speech worked well because the responses from the citizens seemed like he managed to persuade them because they are vulnerable. Antony makes his speech straight after Brutus. The citizens have already made up their mind of what they think of Caesar. "Caesar was a tyrant" shows us this. The significant factor of Antony's speech is that he speaks in blank verse which is commonly used with the higher status. Antony starts off by saying "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears" This seems quite ironic because Brutus starts off his speech very similarly. During this speech Antony uses persuasive tactics to win the citizens over and also to undermine Brutus. Some of the persuasion techniques Antony uses are repetition, lies, rhetorical questions and teasing. Antony uses repetition by repeating "Brutus is an honourable man" quite a lot to undermine him. The repetition makes it ironic. Antony also tells lies. "I come to bury Caesar's body, not to praise him" "I speak not to disapprove what Brutus has said" He does this to win the crowd over and to appear to be well meaning and also to win trust and to hide his true motives. Rhetorical questions are used a few times as well. He says "Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?" and "Was this ambitious?" ...read more.

Conclusion

"He would be crown'd how that might change his nature, there's the question" This shows how Brutus acted out of the best intentions. Further evidence of this is that "Brutus is not barbaric; he only wants to purge Rome of tyranny. "Let's be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius. We all stand up against the spirit of Caesar" Brutus also thinks that Antony is harmless even though this later becomes Brutus' fatal error of judgement. "And for Mark Antony, think not of him for he can do no more than Caesar's arm when Caesar's head is off". Brutus' poor judgement of character has lead to tragedy. He misjudged Antony twice. Firstly Brutus let Antony live after the killing of Caesar. After the death of Caesar, Antony became powerful and became a member of the 2nd Triumvirate with Octavius and Lepidus. Antony becomes deceitful and cunning by back stabbing Lepidus. The 2nd misjudgement was when Brutus let Antony speak at Caesar's funeral. it led to the impact of Brutus' tragic fault in Act 3 Scene 2. After this, Brutus' death was inevitable. This makes Antony's triumph over the conspirators, the most gripping climax of the play. I think that overall, Antony was the better person of the two. His speech was more persuasive because it led the Romans to rage and mutiny against Brutus. I think that Brutus behaved very unwisely because he made 2 very bad decisions which later led to his death. Julius Caesar Coursework Becki Weare 11S2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Antony's use of rhetoric in Act3, Scene2 is more effective than Brutus'.

    4 star(s)

    Hath told you Caesar was ambitious: if it were so, it was a grievous fault, and grievously had Caesar answered it. Proof(confirmatio), is essentially the evidence to support your point, for example, 'you did all see on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Why is Antony a more effective speaker than Brutus?

    3 star(s)

    Again he also does this to make Brutus seem less honourable. Also by mentioning how Caesar praised Brutus it makes the Caesar's death more unjust as he was killed by 'Caesar's angel'.

  1. Compare and contrast the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus. Which is the most ...

    This shows that the crowd is more interested in what Antony is saying and will therefore probably end up sharing his views against Brutus. In my opinion, the turning point at which the crowd have switched sides is when a member of the crowd says, "Marked ye his words?

  2. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    By saying that Caesar would give everyone money Antony manages to build up support for him. The reply from the plebeians is "Most noble Caesar! We'll revenge his death." This now shows that the plebeians do not believe that the conspirators killed Caesar for the good of Rome but for their own benefit.

  1. Julius Caesar - How does Shakespeare use the events, themes and language present in ...

    During the speech Anthony includes lots of Rhetorical questions such as "Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?" This is a technique which is very good at persuading crowds as it manipulates the audience to believe that he is right. Anthony then explains how Caesar was definitely not ambitious when he

  2. A Comparative Study of the Two Funeral Speeches from Act II, Scene II of ...

    To kill Caesar, the conspirators had to get very close to him. They had no other way of killing him except to stab him. To do this they beg for him to let Publius Cimber to have freedom, they surround him and when they are all around him, they make their move and stab him to death.

  1. Julius Caesar- Mark Antony speech - Analysis

    how they cheered for Pompey once and now they celebrate his defeat. This relates to the public's opinion being easily swayed as they side with Antony just as easily as they sided with Brutus. Here Shakespeare may be trying to suggest that he believed the proletariat might never rise up against the system, as they are just too fickle.

  2. Compare the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

    a valid reason for the joint murder of Julius Caesar, therefore he begins with the line 'Romans, countrymen and lovers, hear me for my cause' Appealing to their sense of patriotism with the word 'Romans' and suggesting that he is very passionate in his reasons for joining the conspirators 'Hear

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work