How does Willy Russell present differences between Mr Briggs and Mrs Kay

Authors Avatar

How does Willy Russell present differences between Mr Briggs and Mrs Kay in “Our day Out”?

Willy Russell contrasts two teachers in the play “Our Day Out” in order to present different teaching attitudes. The play is set in 1970’s Liverpool, which was poverty-stricken and had high levels of unemployment. By having this setting Russell gives the teachers difficult children to teach and the play seems to test who will deal with the children best. Russell doesn’t make either of the teachers perfect but exposes their true feelings to show what attributes a good teacher should have. Mr Briggs is strict but willing to teach whereas Mrs Kay is fun and sympathetic but has lost hope in teaching the students. In my opinion Russell seems more approving of Mr Briggs, especially by the end of the play.


Mrs Kay and Mr Briggs have very different relationships and attitudes to the children in the Progress Class. The differences are between the teachers are revealed through the handling of and treatment of the children. They have different characteristics but neither of them can be said to be entirely positive or negative in the eyes of the audience and also the children. Mrs Kay is relaxed and gentle with children whereas Mr Briggs is far stricter and more demanding of the Progress Class. This is apparent as soon as the play starts so the audience admire Mrs Kay over Mr Briggs at the beginning.

The audience can see straight away that the children feel intimidated by Mr Briggs. When the boys “rush to the safety of Mrs Kay’s group” it seems as if Mr Briggs poses some sort of threat to the children. This contrasts with Mrs Kay, who the children feel safe with. This is because Mrs Kay cherishes them, even to the extent that she would make excuses or tell lies to defend her class. An example of this is when she lies to the bus driver that, “the kids with me today don’t know what it is to look at a bar of chocolate”, and “Lemonade never touches their lips”. Her lies are emphasised by the layout of the stage: the audience watches the Driver and Mrs Kay talking, but at the same time they see the children “stuffing themselves stupid with sweets, chocolate and lemonade” behind them. This becomes very ironical and comical when the Driver looks “grief-stricken” and the children quickly hide the junk food when he turns around to look at them. It is obvious from this that the Progress Class enjoy being with Mrs Kay and the audience does not think too negatively of her.

Mr Briggs, on the other hand, is not really attached to the Progress Class and is quite critical of them. At one point he says ironically: “You’ve got some real bright sparks here Mrs Kay. A right bunch”. This clearly shows that he does not understand the circumstances of the Progress Class – he does not understand poverty or its effects. He is also less patient and less sympathetic than Mrs Kay, “I said sit lad, no move”, “Well find one boy, find one!” and “What you doing lad, what you doing?” This makes it easy to understand why the children prefer Mrs Kay to Mr Briggs. Mr Briggs’ negative attitude is reinforced when he says, “There is a few of them I could sling off right now”. It is reinforced further when he is compared to a dog, as the stage directions say that he is “barking”. This dehumanises him and makes him look like a aggressive animal.

Join now!

Mr Briggs is quite prejudiced towards the children because he expects them to behave badly even before they set off for the outing. For example, he sings “I do not want to see two fingers raised to passing motorists”. Although the children do behave badly, it seems a bit unfair that he lectures them before they set off: “We do not wander up and down the aisles/ We do not use obscenities/ Or throw each other sweets”. However, it shows him as a much more responsible teacher than Mrs Kay, and the children do need to be reminded of what ...

This is a preview of the whole essay