• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

How effectively did the Scots respond to Edward I's historical arguments for English superiority over Britain?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

David Stevens Tutor: Dr. Roger Mason How effectively did the Scots respond to Edward I's historical arguments for English superiority over Britain? The concept of superiority and even overlordship over the rest of the British Isles and its peoples played a central role in the formation of a sense of English identity and the formation of England as a defined social and political unit. The writings of Gerald of Wales and William of Malmesbury described the other peoples inhabiting Britain and Ireland as uncivilised barbarians and these influential ideas, strengthened with the experiences of the population with the other peoples, and the English financial and institutional superiority, provided the basis for expansion and what can be described as the first wave of English imperialism. It was not until the reign of King Edward I of England, however, that there was a monarch with the legal, political and military talent, and perhaps more importantly the determination to realise the natural English right to rule Britain. He enjoyed much success in Wales and qualified success in Ireland, but was aware that Scotland was always a different proposition, particularly because of its special relationship with the papacy. When the succession crisis arose therefore, with the death of King Alexander III and the subsequent death of his only heir young Margaret the Maid of Norway, thus putting an end to Edward I's plans laid down at the Treaty of Birgham in 1290 to marry his son to the young heiress; a protracted battle of words, letters, myths and histories broke out. In the modern vernacular therefore, a propaganda campaign on a scale and influence never before witnessed in the British Isles was to provide the crucial narrative behind military campaigns as Edward I sought the fulfilment of his Arthurian dream of himself as the legendary king of Britain. It was primarily Edward's ambition that led to both the historiographical and military struggle between Scotland and England after a lengthy period of peace throughout the thirteenth century between the two kingdoms that for the medieval period can be seen as quite remarkable. ...read more.

Middle

rightfully deserves, it seems fair to claim that he was to emerge victorious from this particular battle in the Anglo-Scottish war of historiography. Foremost of Edward's arguments was his appeal to history and the processus sent to the pope by Bisset and his accomplices deals successfully with these claims. They stress that Edwards 'right' can only be defended by his use of events "not recent but remote in time," relying on evidence from "a time for which no memory exists."6 The basis of the argument seems to derive from recognition of the fact that situations or circumstances do not remain constant over time. Bisset concedes that Arthur did indeed conquer Scotland but points out that amongst other problems of the lack of knowledge of events so far in the past, such a fact could not be used to justify situations as they are in the present day. He cites the Roman Empire as his example pointing out that they no longer "lord it over the entire world."7 It would therefore be unwise to attach too much authority to historical conditions which altered long ago since "lordship over possessions and over kingdoms are distinct in the law of nations, and are frequently transferred under various titles and for various reasons from people to people and from nation to nation."8 Perhaps more tellingly he instructs Boniface VIII of Edward's background, arguing that while the descendants of Brutus once ruled the island of Britain, the Britons were later conquered by the Saxons, who in turn fell before the Danes. When the Saxons finally overcame the Scandinavians they were to be conquered once again by the Normans. Edward's use of British history therefore becomes irrelevant since Edward "has not succeeded the Britons but the Normans... From this it is clear that as regards those matters which prevailed in antiquity, many changes happened by the very nature of things, which is unable to remain in the same state."9 These arguments would certainly seem to undermine those in Edward's letter, though it is essential not to lapse into an overly modern reading of this medieval text. ...read more.

Conclusion

surely Fiona Watson is correct in saying that such a notion as that of popular sovereignty from an early period in Scotland, "would have been greeted with complete incomprehension by Bruce, not to mention his Stewart descendants."20 Watson also goes on to illustrate the Declaration was not particularly effective since only months after it's composition, Bruce faced rebellion from many of the 'signatories' of the Declaration, "perhaps galled by the obvious discrepancy between the version of events portrayed there and their own memories."21 The efficacy of most of the writings from Bruce's time therefore, came from their attempt, and ultimately their considerable success, in justifying the Bruce claim to the throne and in turn to have a unifying effect on what was a trenchantly divided kingdom, and played a significant role in the creation of a new sense of Scottish nationhood. Perhaps the key outcome of Scotland's struggle to preserve its independence from England, then, was the accelerated growth of national consciousness among many different groups within Scottish society during the latter thirteenth century and beyond, and the real efficacy of the Scottish writings of the time were to this end. Both the ruling classes, comprising all secular and church government, and the vast majority of the Scottish people, whose resources were essential to the success of the prolonged Wars of Independence, together arrived at a "fuller conception of the Scottish nation, its history, and its traditional forms of government."22 The production of historiography played a constitutive role in the development of national consciousness in Scotland. Master Bisset and later those who wrote to justify the reign of the Bruce's reproduced the larger political conflict in another form and through their appeals to history, as has been shown, were able to render illegitimate Edward's claims to English superiority of Scotland. While not creating a sense of Scottish identity, as this was necessarily present before their writings, they served to galvanise this idea and so played a crucial role in the continuing independence of Scotland. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. 'In plot, in imagery, in structure, Richard II offers us little thatis not already ...

    V.iv.65-6) only to have him killed by the end. In the audiences eyes Marlowe's is a very just play: Edward II who was never a true king is dead, his enemy and murderer executed by his son and successor and his wife who betrayed him imprisoned. Everybody who turned against the king in the first battle was executed and

  2. What is significant about the way David Hare ends "Skylight"?

    Most of the play is spent in darkness, apart from when Kyra and Tom sleep together, and in the morning there is a '...white light reflected off the snow...'(pg.55) The natural light means rebirth. Food, I feel, is one of the strongest visual metaphors.

  1. Is it right to describe Edward the Confessor as a failure?

    This evidence is shown by Barlow1and supported by ASC (C),2which also mentions that the bishopric given to Heca was later given to Stigand. Therefore it is probable that this piece of evidence is reliable. This shows Edward as not a failure due to his effective leadership in appointing abbots and bishops selectively.

  2. After successfully invading England, William the Conqueror changed the course of English history

    After a poor start, he rallied his troops. Harold's brothers were killed early in the battle; Harold fell towards dusk. On Christmas Day 1066 William was crowned. The first years of his reign were spent quashing rebellions and securing his borders. He invaded Scotland in 1072 and Wales in 1081 and created special defensive 'marcher' counties along the borders.

  1. How effective was Edward IV's domestic government from 1471?

    Richard III set this council up in the north in 1484 and then Henry VII again instated the Council of Wales in 1480s and another in the north from 1489. These councils were made permanent from 1530s to the 17th century, which showed that Edward IV knew what he was

  2. This excerpt is taken from the very first act of Shakespeare's play 'Richard III', ...

    King Richard evidently impressed some people with his generosity. Richard did execute the Duke of Buckingham during his reign, but that was not because he viewed the man as a threat to his claim to the throne and wanted him out of the way, but was instead a result of

  1. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    It, however, was booed and only a few people liked the idea. Buckingham had to end his speech sooner than planned and leave quickly. Richard is furious on hearing this, but goes along with the plan to become king. The plan is to persuade the lord mayor to ask Richard to become king.

  2. Comment on the characters and behaviour of Edward Ferrars and John Willoughby in "Sense ...

    Marianne flaunted the relationship, and gave everyone reason to believe they were engaged for example she gave Willoughby a lock of her hair and rode out in his carriage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work