How Far do Owen(TM)s Poems Break with the Jingoistic Literary Tradition Established by Various Poets during World War 1?

Authors Avatar

Yasmin Layouni

Owen vs. Jingoists

How Far do Owen’s Poems Break with the Jingoistic Literary Tradition Established by Various Poets during World War 1?

Although Wilfred Owen and the jingoists deal with the same subject of war in their poems, their attitudes towards the topic differ dramatically and this is shown through the style and content in which the various poets have written.

The Jingoists had a chauvinistic and positive attitude towards the war. They have illustrated their aggressive patriotism through their poems, which deliver the clear and concise message: that war is morally correct and men who don’t sign up to fight are inferior. These sorts of messages were used to try and recruit members of the public and to illustrate the type of men who were ideals and chivalry in terms of war according to what the Jingoists believed. Ultimately the Jingoists poems were used to persuade the general public to believe that war was the way forward. Their poems create an inspirational mood, one that indicates patriotism and optimism.

On the other hand, Owen had a totally opposite opinion of war. He was strongly against war as he could not see what it achieved, only the suffering it caused. The ideas that he expresses throughout his poems concerning the war and fighting are all negative with their angry and bitter mood. Unlike many of the Jingoists who used their poems to try and recruit members of the public, Owen’s poems give a sort of warning that war is nothing like it is portrayed to be and that it is actually a very grim and dangerous experience.

Comparing Owen’s poems with the Jingoists’ poems, it is apparent that Owen’s poems break with the Jingoistic literary tradition through the content and style in which the poems are written. The content of the poems, when compared shows that Owen often has a completely opposing view to the Jingoist poets regarding how war is portrayed. In ‘Who’s For The Game?’ by Jessie Pope, war is described in a positive way whereas in ‘DEDE’ by Wilfred Owen, war is described as anything but positive. In ‘WFTG’ and ‘Peace’ by Rupert Brooke, the impression is given that men who sign up are better than those who don’t.  Similarly in these two poems and in ‘The Two Mothers’ by Matilda Betham-Edwards, the idea is brought about of how people who don’t sign up for war are inferior. In Owen’s poem, ‘Disabled’, however, a completely opposite message is portrayed. It is clear that he is saying that people who do go to war and return home injured are inferior. ‘WFTG’, ‘P’, ‘FI’ and ‘To The Others’ by Katherine Tynan illustrate that war is morally correct. Dissimilarly, in Owen’s poem, ‘D’ he opposes this idea. In Harold Begbie’s poem, ‘Fall In’, he explains that those who don’t sign up will become outcasts and will later regret not going to war. On the contrary, Owen says that men who sign up to war will regret this decision due to the consequences in both ‘D’ and ’Anthem For The Doomed Youth’.  Herbert Asquith’s poem, ‘The Volunteer’ portrays war as being a positive life experience. It also emphasises the likelihood that as a soldier you will return to your country. However, Owen demonstrates war in a negative manner, and exemplifies the lack of the odds that soldiers are likely to survive, in his two poems, ‘D’ and ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’.  ‘FTF’ demonstrates that, those who fought in the war will be honoured whereas Owen refutes this idea in ‘AFDY’ and ‘DEDE’ and shows that you are not respected when you die fighting. ‘WFTG’ depicts war as a game or race and illustrates it in an exciting light, whereas Owen refutes the jingoistic arguments and tears them apart in ‘D’.

The style of the Jingoist’s poems often reveal that they are using similar devices as Owen, yet produce different effects or arguments. They have also occasionally written in similar styles for different purposes. In ‘WFTG’, Britain is portrayed as a vulnerable woman in need of rescue. Owen uses the same idea in his poem, ‘DEDE’, however, it is not Britain being being personified as the victim; it is the soldiers who are shown to be suffering and in need of help. ‘WFTG’ uses guilt as a device and although ‘AFDY’ uses this same tactic, Owen has chosen it to create a totally different effect. ‘WFTG’ and ‘AFDY’ both use a rhyming scheme but to different effects.  ‘V’ displays contrasts between those who go to war and those who don’t, whilst Owen contrasts suffering with happiness in ‘D’. Both ‘FI’ and ‘AFDY’ use rhetorical questions but to create different effects on their audiences. Women are used as persuasive devices in ‘FI’ and ‘D’ yet they erect completely opposite arguments. ‘FI’ juxtaposes the past with the present. However Owen juxtaposes the present with the past in ‘D’. Finally, ‘FI’ focuses on individuals and personalises war, whereas in ‘AFDY’, Owen generalises war making it impersonal.

Join now!

In ‘WFTG’, war is described in a very positive way and is referred to as a “show.” This effectively appeals to the audience. “Who would much rather come back with a crutch, Than lie low and be out of the fun?” This question portrays war in an exciting light as it is made clear that coming back from the fighting crippled is well worth it rather than missing out on the so called ‘fun’. The word ‘fun’ is associated with enjoyment and amusement, and so causes the reader to believe that war is in actual fact a pleasure to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay