• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you consider the inspector successful in interrogating the Birling Family? To answer this question, consider the whole play.

Extracts from this document...


How far do you consider the inspector successful in interrogating the Birling Family? To answer this question, consider the whole play. The inspector was very successful in his interrogation of the Birling family; each member revealed their past that was connected to the death of Eva Smith. He also brings out the true nature of each individual. Priestly spends much time detailing the scenery at the beginning of the first Act. He also depicts the family well before the inspector arrives. This indicates that the audience needs to have a clear idea of the kind of family Priestley is portraying. The family represents the upper middle class, becoming rich through business. The theme of class is important to this play. Priestley believed that everyone should be equal and no one fails foul of poverty, which he witnessed in his lifetime. His purpose was to turn society as far as possible into a classless, community-based country. To answer the question we must examine each character and how they react to the questioning. Mr Birling is the head of the Birling family and he is an arrogant, ignorant overbearing pompous man. In addition, he is very aware of himself and all the things that he has gained. He is very dismissive about the realities of the world and he likes to give advice "Now you three young people just listen" Birling's predictions for the future indicate much about his character. The audience can see that he is not as clever as he claims to be about predicting the future. The play was written in the autumn of 1944 and people had learned what happened in history. The Second World War was to have a catastrophic effect on humanity, and Priestley diminishes his character by placing him in ignorance. " The Titanic - she sails next week - forty six thousand eight hundred tons - forty six thousand eight hundred tons - New York in five days- and every luxury - and unsinkable, absolutely unsinkable. ...read more.


She and Eric are the only characters that are not concerned whether Goole was a real Inspector - she says 'It doesn't make any real difference' Because she acknowledges her behaviour was morally wrong, whether or not it was legally wrong and whether or not it actually resulted in a girl's death. By the end of the play, she has begun to have some understanding of what the Inspector is doing, so that she is able to see the world, and her responsibility, according to his values instead of those of her family. This is why she can see the trap her mother's arrogance is creating, and why she tries to stop her mother from exposing and condemning the child's father. It is only she and Eric, the two youngest and 'more impressionable' characters who, in the playwright's eyes, have profited sufficiently from the lessons on stage in front of them not to repeat their mistakes a second time. The playwright describes Gerald in the opening stage directions as 'very much the easy well-bred young man-about-town'. He has the world at his feet: his father is a successful businessman, his mother comes from 'an old country family', and he has finally become engaged to Sheila after having been 'trying long enough'. He behaves respectfully and like a proper gentleman in front of his father-in-law, but it is clear that there is unresolved tension between him and Sheila over what he was doing 'all last summer' - the time when, as the play later reveals, he was seeing Eva Smith. He loyally supports Birling when the Inspector, claiming that, questions him "I know we'd have done the same thing" Even though it upsets Sheila - another example of the fact that, beneath the surface, their relationship is far from perfect- and is taken aback when he hears of her behaviour towards the girl .He seems chivalrous, like Birling, in trying to protect Sheila from the details of the case - but this is hypocritical in ...read more.


than to take it (which Birling does)'. What's more, the inspector has peeled away the veneer of respectability that the Birling's pride themselves on. Despite the importance in the local community of people like Gerald and the Birlings, he controls the development of events: who will speak and when; who may or may not leave; who will or will not see the photograph. He even seems to control what people say. Sheila tells Gerald: "Somehow he makes you" But he does not control their reactions - he only uses his information about the Eva Smith's life and character, her diary and a letter, her photograph, and constant reminders of the horrific death she has suffered, to create the possibility for others to face up to what they have done. They must decide whether to change or not - Sheila and Eric do; the Birlings and perhaps Gerald do not. Each character is punished in an appropriate way. Birling fears for his family's reputation at the inquest; Sheila feels shame for her selfishness; Gerald has his affair revealed in front of Sheila; Mrs Birling has her illusions about the respectability of her family shattered by Eric; and Eric is revealed before his indulgent parents as a spoilt and inadequate young man. However, in each case, the punishment is a consequence of their own behaviour; the Inspector himself does not bring punishment from outside. Perhaps this is why they are given a second chance at the end of the play - that their experience should have been a warning to them, and that next time, it is the apocalyptic future predicted by the Inspector's final speech that lies in store for them. In conclusion, the inspector is very successful in interrogating the family; he brings out to the open the faults of each character and changes the relationship between the characters. He also raises the question of community and how we are all members of a community that need to look after each other. As he says "We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other." Mimi Anim-Nyame10KL/10T Mimi Anim-Nyame10KL/10T ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The apportioning of blame and responsibility are central themes in 'An Inspector Calls'. Each ...

    4 star(s)

    to her senses and is now becoming suspicious if not aware of Gerald's involvement. Whilst the inspector is outside of the room he confesses to having an affair with Daisy to Sheila. The inspector returns to the room at this point Eric is referred to as a young man who

  2. Discussthe role of the Inspector in the play 'An Inspector Calls'

    Think about the least fortunate then yourself and how your actions could take a massive impact on others who live and work around you. This play would challenge the audience with their moral beliefs of right and wrong. Examining the Role of Sheila After the Inspector has Left An Inspector Calls is a play that was written by J.B.

  1. Compare And Contrast Eric And Gerald. Which Do You Consider To Be Most To ...

    Finally, Eric drinks but Gerald is much more in control of himself. Through these differences and similarities, both Eric and Gerald moved Eva closer to her death as they both left her to cope on her own.

  2. Write about Sheila Birling her role in the play, character and relationships

    Sheila then accepts her mistakes and begins to work with the Inspector and is the most responsive to his questioning, challenging Gerald's hypocrisy with her own blatant honesty, uncovering the truth about Eric's alcohol addiction, and revealing the extent of Alderman "Joe" Meggarty's womanising.

  1. How does the character of Sheila Birling, develop throughout this play?

    Sheila is the grown-up in all of this. She is the one who explains things, who helps people to understand the situation, and to say what has to be said. Inspector: And you can't even say 'I'm sorry, Eva Smith'. (Act 3, page 56) Sheila: That's the worst of it.

  2. Write about Inspector Goole's role in the play. How far is he a believable ...

    It would take a few days to look through it properly. This shows his supernatural and otherworldly powers in this overlooked part of the play. His role as an omniscient character, yet being an outsider is an interesting combination. As dramatically one can achieve results such as using the Inspector

  1. Discuss the Importance of the Inspector 'Goole' in this play:

    he or she knows who it is, Priestley cleverly seems to switch to the inspecting of another character. This is a very good technique. The Birlings represents the richer people in society that does not care for their fellow companions.

  2. "You and I aren't the same people who sat down together before dinner" Sheila ...

    begins to criticise his father and mother in a similar manner to Sheila, although not in such as sophisticated a manner. The reason for this early change is due to the fact that Eric, of course, has been seeing "Daisy Renton� until very recently, and his instinctive exclamation of "My

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work