• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you sympathise with Victor Frankenstein’s creature?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you sympathise with Victor Frankenstein's creature? "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes into you" When answering the set question, there are a number of determining factors that have to be taken into close consideration. In this essay I hope to address and evaluate each of the factors before putting forward a conclusion. Both Victor Frankenstein and the creature have serious personality defects, but there are extenuating circumstances that have to be considered before laying blame at the feet of either character. Virtue is found at the margins of society more often than at its centre. If this is so, Mary Shelley's Creation is a typical example. Her creature is an isolate of great sensitivity, kindness, and insight. We are firstly able to attribute these virtues to him in chapter eleven when the creature is born. "Soon a gentle light stole over the heavens, and gave me a sensation of pleasure. I stared up, and beheld a radiant rise from among the trees. I gazed with a kind of wonder.........innumerable sounds rung in my ears, and on all sides various scents saluted me: the only object I could distinguish was the bright moon, and I fixed my eyes on it with pleasure. From these lines we can see that the creature has a positive outlook on life and is extremely sensitive and articulate. We like the creature because he creates beautiful imagery with his gentle and descriptive language and describes what he sees perfectly creating clear images in our minds. At this point we are very sympathetic towards the creature because firstly we like the creature and because his talent for language allows us to understand and relate to him. Another important factor in this novel is the initial treatment of the creature by his creator Victor Frankenstein. ...read more.

Middle

He therefore reasons that the mastery of the "godlike" science of words might break his lonely quarantine. It is tragic that the reader realises that the harnessing of language and communication will not alleviate his isolation and pity. Communication will intensify the creature's isolation by the realisation of his difference. The arrival of Safie, Felix De Lacey's Arabian fianc�e, expedites the creature's goal. She has to learn French in order to fully participate in family life. From behind a chink in the rough wall, the creature takes part in a hidden tutorial, learning his lessons more eagerly than Safie. His eagerness to learn and to be normal gains the respect and pity of the reader. Volney's history, Ruins of Empires, narrated the plight of the exploited "savage" in North America. Hearing of their misery moves the creature to tears. He compares his rejection by humans with the racial bigotry of the colonists. Contrasting this history with the hospitality he observes in the cottage gives him hope. The De Laceys never turn a stranger from their door. The creature reasons that the family might welcome him. Goethe's Sorrows of Werther introduces the Monster to the sensitivity and agonies of romance. He weeps again, feeling kinship with the unrequited Werther. Felix and Safie's affection for one another increases the intensity of the creature�s loneliness. He becomes aware of his own need for never-to-be granted sexual satisfaction. Self-destruction proposes a decisive way out of pain and rejection. Living, however, seems to offer more to the creature since Werther's wretched life displayed a depth of devotion that went beyond mere escape. Sorrow might ennoble the creature, fitting him for respect if not love. This complex thought and reason on behalf of the creature intensifies the tragedy of his destiny. Despite his external faults, we see that the creature has more intelligence, sensitivity, and compassion than many humans. Again the reader respects and pity's the creature. Reading Milton's Paradise Lost, schools the creature concerning humanity's alienation from their Creator. ...read more.

Conclusion

We can see that the creature is repenting for his sins and is sorry for what he has done. His final suicide consolidates his guilt and sorrow at the evil actions that he committed. I believe that his final speech was heartfelt and genuine to every word. It is criminal platform, which declares that upbringing, social pressure and heinous abuse lead to evil behaviour. Murder, theft and rape, according to this view, are inescapably the result of extraneous factors, not personal choice. Despite the creatures appalling crimes, we recognise his justification for his actions. We see that his inner pity and loneliness drive him to the edge. Frankenstein appears to be the antipathy of the creatures existence and its actions. The creature is not to blame - it is the creator. For this reason, we feel more pathos, compassion, and pity for the creature - not its creator. But we should not hate victor Frankenstein he was not an evil man, he paid a heavy price for his actions. He saw the death of his loved ones and finally his own bitter death. He was a scientist eager to break back the boundaries of science. Ever since the death of his mother he swore to put an end to death. His reasons for creating the creature are noble, but his character defects were his downfall, he was naive and irresponsible, which considering his young age I think is quite acceptable. He did not purposely set out to do harm, so I would not bestow all the blame on him. I think that both characters were caught up in a string of moral and ethical dilemmas for which they did not know the solutions, and it resulted in their deaths. In answer to the set question "how far do you sympathise with Victor Frankenstein's creature, I will say that I sympathise greatly. But I also sympathise with Victor Frankenstein who I think paid the greatest price of all. "In no beast so fierce, does not now some touch of pity" By Mathew Quinn 11 NM ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. For Whom Does the Reader Feel More Sympathy: Victor Frankenstein or The Creature?

    In chapter five Mary Shelley shows Victors disappointment with his creation: 'how can I describe my emotions at this catastrophe' Mary Shelley is showing the reader that the accomplishments of Victors 'toils' was not as perfect as he wanted them to be.

  2. How far does Mary Shelley(TM)s presentation of the monster in Frankenstein lead you to ...

    that the monster is evil, Shelley purposefully uses vivid descriptive language to convey the image across; she also purposefully used oxymorons to create a contrast that works in a negative way on the monsters appearance. "These luxuriances only formed a more horrid complexion with his watery eyes" This quote shows

  1. Is Chapter Five Particularly Significant to the Novel Frankenstein?

    So scary that people are afraid of it. So scary that life tends to cease until it is done. So scary that vampires actually like it. But Mary Shelley is not satisfied with mere drear or just night fright - she is after something more emotive to preface her revelation.

  2. 'Frankenstein's savage patterns suggest that he not the apparently more civilised creature is the ...

    Elizabeth tried to save Justine Moritz although failed to save her and she was then hanged. Victor Frankenstein, however, knew that he could save Justine if he wanted to, but didn't want to for fear of being prosecuted himself, as he would have to reveal that he let a monster, his own creation, into the world.

  1. Frankenstein's Creature: Monster or Victim

    In 1817, Percy Shelley (Mary Shelley's husband) and Byron discussed galvanism which is the idea of reanimating things using electricity. An Italian physicist, Lugi Galvani demonstrated what we now know to be the electrical basis of nerve impulses. Mary Shelley included these ideas in the novel and took scientific experiments to the extreme.

  2. The creature is the man victor can never be

    In the novel Victor is not a killer, he never sets out to hurt others intentionally. He becomes blinded by his work, but never sets out to kill in cold blood. This highlights the point that Shelley may be stereotyping the creature as most people would as a killer, but

  1. Frankenstein: The Significance Of The Creatures Speech

    insight to the extent of what knowledge and desires a new being has from birth. "Several changes of day and night passed...when I began to distinguish my sensations from each other" Given no education other then what he can teach himself the creature sets about the task of mental development and survival.

  2. 'Did I request thee, Maker, from my clay/ To mould thee man? Did I ...

    However, first of all I will examine Frankenstein's narrative where we can see that there is regular emphasis put on the benevolence of the characters. His father 'passed his younger days perpetually occupied by the affairs of his country' and his parents' 'benevolent dispositions often made them enter the cottages of the poor'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work