• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you sympathise with Victor Frankenstein’s creature?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you sympathise with Victor Frankenstein's creature? "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes into you" When answering the set question, there are a number of determining factors that have to be taken into close consideration. In this essay I hope to address and evaluate each of the factors before putting forward a conclusion. Both Victor Frankenstein and the creature have serious personality defects, but there are extenuating circumstances that have to be considered before laying blame at the feet of either character. Virtue is found at the margins of society more often than at its centre. If this is so, Mary Shelley's Creation is a typical example. Her creature is an isolate of great sensitivity, kindness, and insight. We are firstly able to attribute these virtues to him in chapter eleven when the creature is born. "Soon a gentle light stole over the heavens, and gave me a sensation of pleasure. I stared up, and beheld a radiant rise from among the trees. I gazed with a kind of wonder.........innumerable sounds rung in my ears, and on all sides various scents saluted me: the only object I could distinguish was the bright moon, and I fixed my eyes on it with pleasure. From these lines we can see that the creature has a positive outlook on life and is extremely sensitive and articulate. We like the creature because he creates beautiful imagery with his gentle and descriptive language and describes what he sees perfectly creating clear images in our minds. At this point we are very sympathetic towards the creature because firstly we like the creature and because his talent for language allows us to understand and relate to him. Another important factor in this novel is the initial treatment of the creature by his creator Victor Frankenstein. ...read more.


He therefore reasons that the mastery of the "godlike" science of words might break his lonely quarantine. It is tragic that the reader realises that the harnessing of language and communication will not alleviate his isolation and pity. Communication will intensify the creature's isolation by the realisation of his difference. The arrival of Safie, Felix De Lacey's Arabian fianc�e, expedites the creature's goal. She has to learn French in order to fully participate in family life. From behind a chink in the rough wall, the creature takes part in a hidden tutorial, learning his lessons more eagerly than Safie. His eagerness to learn and to be normal gains the respect and pity of the reader. Volney's history, Ruins of Empires, narrated the plight of the exploited "savage" in North America. Hearing of their misery moves the creature to tears. He compares his rejection by humans with the racial bigotry of the colonists. Contrasting this history with the hospitality he observes in the cottage gives him hope. The De Laceys never turn a stranger from their door. The creature reasons that the family might welcome him. Goethe's Sorrows of Werther introduces the Monster to the sensitivity and agonies of romance. He weeps again, feeling kinship with the unrequited Werther. Felix and Safie's affection for one another increases the intensity of the creature�s loneliness. He becomes aware of his own need for never-to-be granted sexual satisfaction. Self-destruction proposes a decisive way out of pain and rejection. Living, however, seems to offer more to the creature since Werther's wretched life displayed a depth of devotion that went beyond mere escape. Sorrow might ennoble the creature, fitting him for respect if not love. This complex thought and reason on behalf of the creature intensifies the tragedy of his destiny. Despite his external faults, we see that the creature has more intelligence, sensitivity, and compassion than many humans. Again the reader respects and pity's the creature. Reading Milton's Paradise Lost, schools the creature concerning humanity's alienation from their Creator. ...read more.


We can see that the creature is repenting for his sins and is sorry for what he has done. His final suicide consolidates his guilt and sorrow at the evil actions that he committed. I believe that his final speech was heartfelt and genuine to every word. It is criminal platform, which declares that upbringing, social pressure and heinous abuse lead to evil behaviour. Murder, theft and rape, according to this view, are inescapably the result of extraneous factors, not personal choice. Despite the creatures appalling crimes, we recognise his justification for his actions. We see that his inner pity and loneliness drive him to the edge. Frankenstein appears to be the antipathy of the creatures existence and its actions. The creature is not to blame - it is the creator. For this reason, we feel more pathos, compassion, and pity for the creature - not its creator. But we should not hate victor Frankenstein he was not an evil man, he paid a heavy price for his actions. He saw the death of his loved ones and finally his own bitter death. He was a scientist eager to break back the boundaries of science. Ever since the death of his mother he swore to put an end to death. His reasons for creating the creature are noble, but his character defects were his downfall, he was naive and irresponsible, which considering his young age I think is quite acceptable. He did not purposely set out to do harm, so I would not bestow all the blame on him. I think that both characters were caught up in a string of moral and ethical dilemmas for which they did not know the solutions, and it resulted in their deaths. In answer to the set question "how far do you sympathise with Victor Frankenstein's creature, I will say that I sympathise greatly. But I also sympathise with Victor Frankenstein who I think paid the greatest price of all. "In no beast so fierce, does not now some touch of pity" By Mathew Quinn 11 NM ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Mary Shelley essays

  1. With whom do you sympathise with more - Frankenstein or the Creature?

    On a note more relevant to the essay title, Walton leads our early sympathies for Frankenstein and our dislike for the creature. Frankenstein is described in a god-like manner, as a "divine wanderer", whose "...limbs were nearly frozen, and his body dreadfully emaciated by fatigue and suffering".

  2. In what way does Mary Shelley make the reader sympathise with Victor frankenstein's creation?

    hated, who am miserable" this makes him sound pathetic and creates pity. The poor grammar makes him sound like a child which Shelley knew would make her readers pity him and draw attention to his relatively recent creation. In chapter 13 we learn where the creature went over the period

  1. 'Did I request thee, Maker, from my clay/ To mould thee man? Did I ...

    However, first of all I will examine Frankenstein's narrative where we can see that there is regular emphasis put on the benevolence of the characters. His father 'passed his younger days perpetually occupied by the affairs of his country' and his parents' 'benevolent dispositions often made them enter the cottages of the poor'.

  2. Sympathy for the Devil? How does Mary Shelley persuade the reader to pity ...

    Waldman, understanding of it and interested in it. One of Frankenstein's weaknesses was his temper. "My temper was sometimes violent, and my passions vehement; but by some law in my temperature they were turned, not towards childish pursuits, but an eager desire to learn, and not to learn all things indiscriminately.

  1. Who, in your opinion, is the real monster of Mary Shelleys Frankenstein. Is it ...

    "His jaws opened, and he muttered some inarticulate sounds, while a grin wrinkled his cheeks. He may have spoken, but I did not hear; one hand was stretched out, seemingly to detain me..." The creation is shown to be childlike in his mannerisms, smiling for apparently no reason at all and burbling like an infant.

  2. “I will pioneer a new way, explore unknown powers and unfold to the world ...

    Frankenstein didn't know what to do after all of this, it was too much for him and he couldn't handle it, it destroyed his mind, Clerval then came to nurse him "Clerval at first attributed my unusual spirits to joy on his arrival".

  1. Examine Mary Shelley's presentation of the relationship between Frankenstein and the creature!

    This is the first of the many signs that Frankenstein is starting to consider whether the experiment was worth the terrible consequences he now has to suffer. He is also beginning to realise that they are 'bound together' and that he is merely beginning a horrific journey that can only end with the death of the creature.

  2. How far do Walton's letters prepare us for the tale which is about to ...

    As the leader of a dangerous expedition, he is responsible for the lives of other men. His fervent longing for glory endangers those men as he overlooks moral and even rational perceptions of what is possible and what is not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work