• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How, if at all, did the lives of Londoners in the seventeenth century differ from those who lived in the larger provincial towns?

Extracts from this document...


How, if at all, did the lives of Londoners in the seventeenth century differ from those who lived in the larger provincial towns? Life in a metropolis inevitably resembles but is also invariably different to that in its smaller cousins, in the relative complexity of its social make-up, in the economic activities of its residents, their status within the nation and, most importantly, in the everyday experience of those who make it their home. Hence, the experiences of seventeenth century Londoners did differ from those in the larger provincial towns (by which is meant regional centres like Norwich, York and Exeter) in many ways and that as the population of London swelled, these divergences became even more acute. In elucidating this, it is useful to define what is meant by, or what constitutes a 'life', for a comparative study of every aspect of human existence is plainly impossible. Several key areas that can be compared, and affected the lives of all urban dwellers, are health and disease, recreational habits, the local economy, the political context of human existence, and the social geography of the conurbation in question. Taken together, these factors should give a fair indication as to whether the aforementioned comparison is indeed valid, but it admittedly will remain a generalization. Another point to consider is the nature of urban development over the seventeenth century, and the existence of fluctuations over time. It may well be found that at certain times London life became more or less akin to provincial life, but in general the latter trend predominated and London developed a metropolitan consciousness quite unique within the British nation. Before individual experience can be considered it is important to identify the broad demographic context of London and of its provincial counterparts. Firstly, the sheer size and rate of its growth of London as the seventeenth century progressed set it clearly apart from all other British cities. ...read more.


Owing to the deficit of births compared to deaths in London during the seventeenth century, and the actual rise in population of around three hundred thousand people, it has been calculated that an influx of about 8,000 people into the capital per year would have been required to achieve such a rise7. No provincial town experienced such immigration, and few in such towns could have experienced the emotionally profound experience of moving away from a rural lifestyle, to the urban frenzy. For the 750 or so of these 8,000 of landed extraction, this experience might have been very exciting, London offering the attractions of the Royal Court, centralized Bureaucracy, Inns of Court, City financial institutions, and thousands of masters under which to be securely apprenticed. Alongside the recreational, social and intellectual attractions of the metropolis, it seems reasonable to label London a 'city of opportunity' where fortunes could be made, and a return to landed society or continued urban luxury could, with great effort, be obtained. For most, however, the urban environment, conditions of squalor and poor nutrition, lack of relatives close to hand and plain loneliness would have promoted an intense, if potentially transient, sense of confusion. It might be an exaggeration to use the word 'alienation' in this context, because London neighbourhoods could exhibit cohesion and fairy accessible networks of personal support. For example, discontented tenants could protest against an unscrupulous landlord, or neighbours might cooperate to defame the character of a putatively 'wayward' figure.8 But kinship links and the harsh environment did contribute to a sense of confusion through dislocation. In provincial towns, the poor could at least have seen green fields, and have had access to the countryside which in London was all but impossible, and this is not a trivial distinction. Many could not adjust and lapsed into vagrancy or crime, for which London acquired a national reputation9, and the official policy towards vagrancy also set London apart from provincial centres, with the institution of 'hospitals' for vagrants, where they could be hidden from public view10. ...read more.


and Newcastle as an administrative and trading centre for north England and south Scotland are good examples. In as much as the nature of different commodities determines the way in which people work, trade and interact, residents of these towns would have lived noticeably different lives and of course, within these towns, the mixture of poor, rich, vagrant or middling people would have varied as well. However, the size and specialization of such provincial towns means that although they differed significantly, they would have differed to a greater degree with London, as would the lives of their residents. By 1700, London was both the wealthiest and the most impoverished city in the nation, with a vivid spectrum of experiences, so we should remember that the term 'Londoners' is similarly disingenuous. However, diversity of population in terms of occupation, marital custom, recreational habits, social origin and probably most importantly, wealth, such as was experienced by those resident in seventeenth century London and which became accentuated as the century climaxed, would have set them apart from their provincial cousins. 1 R. Finlay 'Population and Metropolis : the Demography of London 1580-1650' 2 N.Goose 'English pre-industrial urban economies' in 'The Tudor and Stuart Town' J. Barry 3 AL Beier and R Finlay 'The making of the Metropolis : London 1500-1700' 4 R. Finlay 'Population and Metropolis : the Demography of London 1580-1650' p 142 5 I. Archer 'The Pursuit of Stability : Social Relations in Elizabethan London' 6 A. McInnes 'Emergence of a Leisure Town : Shrewsbury 1660-1760' 7 AL Beier and R Finlay 'The making of the Metropolis : London 1500-1700' Introduction 8 I. Archer 'The Pursuit of Stability : Social Relations in Elizabethan London' p.74 9 Chapter on London swindlers, R. Tittler 'Townspeople and Nation: English Urban Experiences 1540-1640' 10 A.L. Beier and R. Finlay 'The making of the metropolis 1500-1700' 11 NB/ The details behind this can be found in Finlay et al, but I can't remember exactly where, how professional. 12 J. Barry 'The Tudor and Stuart Town' chapter 3 (I think) ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE William Blake section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE William Blake essays

  1. A comparison between Jean Rhys and Una Marson

    Whereas Zola, in Nana, creates a character who brings about the downfall of upper class men not through power but "with only the unsophisticated currency of youth and raw female sexuality"9 Rhys, in Anna, creates a character who is herself destroyed by men.

  2. How has the development of transport in the 19th century contributed to the growth ...

    Their aim was to make a double tracked line from London to Bristol. The next major priority was to appoint an engineer to over see this construction. In 1835 this all-important position went to the 20 year old Isambard Kingdom Brunell.

  1. Why did the murders attract so much attention in 1888? The notorious Jack the ...

    How was it that he still is not caught? How can he get away with it in such a packed city? It could be me next.....All of London was in such a frenzy, yet how they were notified of the murders, the horrific mutilations and other information such as where

  2. "To say the word Romanticism is to say modern art- that is intimacy, spirituality, ...

    In the octet, Wordsworth tells us in detail what he sees and introduces his idea of London being "so touching". However, in the sestet; he develops this idea and attempts to unify London's landscape with the beauty of the natural world, Wordsworth also informs the reader about what he feels, rather than what he sees.

  1. Initial List of Intriguing cultural differences. There are no toilet seat covers in LondonPeople ...

    We weren't sure which stop to get off at on the train. We were then given bad directions by 3 different people as to the location of our hostel. Eventually we made our way to the places we had to go and tried to keep the reliance on other peoples directions to a minimum.

  2. Impressions of the people and society Blake lived in.

    and here it could mean ether one of the two; it could be referring to the mapping of the streets, as maps were being made of London at this time, or it could be used to express a dirty and restricted River Thames.

  1. Law and Order in the first part of the nineteenth century

    commotion, screaming "Let me go" and stubbornly lying in the gutter, until a crowd of angry bystanders would assemble and demand that the policeman "cease his bullying". Night was the main time when crime took place in London. When thieves and pickpockets mingled with the evening crowds of all classes.

  2. Introduction to the English literature - Coleridge's imagined Paradise described in Kubla Khan.

    creeks are meandering, and there are green sunny fields which are encompassed by the ancient, large trees. The different adjectives represent different shades or colours, for instance "bright" and "sunny' means extremely light, "blossomed' suggests the different intensive colours of the spring and "greenery" represents the various tones of green.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work