How is drama built up during the Second Act of The Crucible?

Authors Avatar

                --        Jibran Afgan 10P

How is drama built up during the Second Act of The Crucible?

The Crucible was written by Arthur Miller in 1953. It is based on the events surrounding the 1692 witch trials of Salem, Massachusetts. Miller wrote about the trials as an allegory for McCarthyism and the Red Scare, which occurred in the USA during the 1950s. His play comments on the parallels between the unjust Salem Witch trials and the Second Red Scare from 1948 to 1956. During McCarthyism, the United States was terrified of Communism’s influence. Like the accused ‘witches’ during the trials and in the play, communists were seen embedded within every aspect of society. Miller was a victim of this widespread hysteria and was sent to jail for withholding the names of those whom he assumed to be communists. Many of Miller’s friends, fearing the anger of the court, provided names of suspected communists to try to save themselves. Similarly, the characters in The Crucible turn on one another in an attempt to save themselves. Due to Miller’s involvement the play can be seen as almost autobiographical because he had personal experience of events similar to those shown in the Crucible, and had previously seen the role that hysteria can play in tearing apart a community.

The play brings out dramatic qualities which illustrate shifts of tension and conflict. Every Act contains a number of scenes which each has its own variation in tone, and comes to an individual climax. The whole play is built around emotion, conflict and tension. The language and grammar used by the characters is quaint and emphasises on another time and place. The tone of the play is highlighted by the language used. Also, the fundamental importance of religion in the lives of the people of Salem is clear from the Biblical style and metaphorical power of their words, “if Rebecca Nurse be tainted, then nothing’s left to stop the whole green world from burning.”

While Act One takes place in Reverend Parris' home, which has become public due to Betty’s illness, Act Two moves into the more private atmosphere of the Proctors' home. This Act starts slowly, with John and Elizabeth Proctor discussing the ongoing accusations and the escalating number of townsfolk who have been accused of being witches. This scene gives the audience their first view of John and Elizabeth together. Until this point the audience has only heard of Elizabeth through Abigail and Proctor’s comments on her. Previously, in Act One, Abigail had painted a picture of Elizabeth to Samuel Parris as being “a bitter, lying, cold and snivelling woman,” as well as “a gossiping liar.” Abigail even goes on to say that she “would not work for such a woman,” giving the audience the impression that Elizabeth is an unjust woman.

The audience does not immediately accept Abigail’s descriptions, because her feelings for Proctor are likely to make her biased. Therefore, Miller builds drama by leaving the audience unsure of what to expect when they first see Elizabeth. Moreover, a clear contrast is shown later on in the Act, when Abigail and Proctor are talking alone, and Abigail insults Elizabeth once more, yet again describing her as a “cold, snivelling” woman, Proctor vehemently defends Elizabeth, shaking Abigail and threatening to give her a “whipping.”

The Proctor’s conversation provides a gentle opening to the scene; it is obvious that Proctor is being pleasant to Elizabeth, “I mean to please you, Elizabeth.” Yet, this evokes a silence, which illustrates their emotional distance; it is almost as if there is an invisible barrier between them due to the affair. At first their conversation is rather mundane, but there is a significant suggestion of unspoken tension between the couple which is undoubtedly caused by John’s affair with Abigail. The audience will pick up on this tension, resulting in good drama.

Join now!

Furthermore, tension is developed because Proctor is trying to make amends for his affair, yet Elizabeth is still unhappy with him. “It’s winter in here yet,” appears to illustrate Proctor’s awareness of the situation. The awkward pauses between the couple highlight a sense of their emotional separation. This aspect is reinforced by the stage directions saying of Elizabeth “she would speak but cannot,” dramatizing the power of her conflicting emotions, through the stilted pace of the scene. This produces powerful and involving drama, capturing the audience.

Act Two is also dramatically significant, because it contrasts clearly with Proctor’s ...

This is a preview of the whole essay