How is Eva Smith presented in the play? What is the function of this absent character?

Authors Avatar by charliebear1997 (student)

Charlotte Withell 11H

How is Eva Smith presented in the play? What is the function of this absent character?

Throughout the play the other characters reveal things to us about Eva smith however their perceptions of her are not always the same as the view that comes across to the audience about her. Mr Birling see that his action of firing Eva smith was completely justified in that it is ‘his duty’ to keep ‘labour costs down’ when she protests to get the workers, not just herself more money. This to Mr Birling is an impossible and outrageously rude request and believes Eva to have an indiscreet lack of disrespect for him so she simply had to go despite being a good worker. To the audience, however this shows Eva not only has incredible courage to stand up for what she believes in but a generous heart to risk her job for the sake of others, the fact she was ‘the ring leader’ tells the audience this. Priestley present her in this way through Mr Birling in the beginning to not only lure the audience into feeling sympathy towards Eva but disliking Mr Birling greatly for his unfair and unjust act against her. Mr Birling judges Eva quickly and assumes she is a trouble maker as when she was accepted for a job at Millwards Mr Birling is not quick to say, ‘got herself into trouble there. I suppose?’ This isn’t however what the audience feels.

Eva Smith is not quick to give up as she soon finds another job showing her determination to have a decent life and works hard at Milwards. Another way in which Priestley uses Sheila to present Eva Smith is the praise worthy attribute of not blaming Sheila for firing her and not judging her as she was judged even though she was stripped of her last hope of a decent life. Priestley uses Sheila’s jealously towards Eva to suggest how quick to judge without understanding society was. This initial envy towards Eva is what causes to ‘almost break down’ and feel ‘distressed’ for the rest of the play because she realises that her quick criticism of Eva was undeserved and as a female, the superior sex at this time, she has empathy for Eva understanding what it is liked to have people to form an opinion of her based primarily on her appearance and situation, rather than truly understood. Even Sheila’s fiancé does not truly  understand for when she begins to speak out and ‘almost in triumph’ takes control of their relationship Gerald ‘looks crushed’ as if his perception of Sheila, the girl he was about to marry has been shattered. And this is one of the reasons Sheila, as quick as she was to judge, was quick to feel remorse and take responsibility for what she had done.

Join now!

After hearing Gerald’s encounter with Eva or Daisy the audience begins to understand a bit better the terrible life she has had to endure and although she is in the palace bar to exploit herself into prostitution, it is only because she has no other choice. It is not her flaws and vices that have led her to this situation but is purely a consequence of society’s lack of consideration and empathy. Eva Smith is quite commendable at this point because despite Gerald ending their relationship to suite himself, Eva is very understanding and ‘didn’t blame (Gerald) at all’ Eva ...

This is a preview of the whole essay