How is Frankenstein a critique of the society Mary Shelley lived in, and what are the roles of nature and society in the novel?

Authors Avatar

How is “Frankenstein” a critique of the society Mary Shelley lived in, and what are the roles of nature and society in the novel?

        Nature plays a large role in the novel, “Frankenstein”, both as the natural world and human nature. The book is clearly not a story of amusement, or of fun and happiness. It is a sad but beautiful story of the need for love and acceptance in society. This reflects a lot on Mary Shelley’s life, as you can tell simply from the language used in the text that she is writing from experience in many parts of the book. Civilization in the days of Mary Shelley is very similar to modern day society, in certain respects, such as the significant presence of justice and fear of the unknown – both of which play important and pivotal roles in “Frankenstein”.

        Right from the moment of the monster’s “birth”, he is unwanted, and from that instant, all the way through the book, up until his departure from society, he leads a miserable life, and his shunned existence seems of no use to humankind. The very first things to happen when the monster comes to life is not very welcoming, as Victor Frankenstein, his creator, say, “unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room and continued a long time traversing my bedroom chamber, unable to compose my mind to sleep”. This gives the immediate assumption that the monster’s appearance is too revolting to look at, and straight away readers can tell that he is not likely to be accepted, wherever he goes. The first things you see or hear as a young child often stick with you through life, and make a lasting impression, and especially as the monster is already fully grown (physically, not mentally), this is going to have even more of an effect on his existence.

        Acceptance is very important in society, and the same perceptions apply just as much today as they did in the 1800’s. It is part of human nature to make instant judgments, and to form first impressions of a person before you know what they are really like, and this is what happened to Frankenstein’s monster in this book. Although it is almost impossible to avoid making these snap decisions, they can almost always be changed later on, and put right once you get to know the person. Everyone wants to be accepted for who they are, regardless of appearances or stature, however this is not always the case. This can be related to the treatment the monster receives upon meeting other people. He is not “the norm”, and is undoubtedly ugly to look at, but that does not make him a bad person. Shelley manages to show this in such a way that the reader feels sorry for the monster, but we can see that it is something that is unlikely to change, as it is a normal part of society and human nature. Shelley shows her disgust at this harsh treatment through the monster’s feelings, which are shared with Victor later on in the book, and it is as if the author is pouring out her emotions, rather than the monster’s.

Join now!

        The hideous figure, the disfigured stature of this monster is the first thing noticed by Victor Frankenstein. “His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles.” This reference to the monster’s yellow skin depicts the same behaviour conducted in modern day racism. The colour of one’s skin does not dictate the intelligence, attitude and personality of a person. Regardless of the yellow skin of the monster, which would repulse and overwhelm most people, there is no need to carry over that emotion to judge the monster’s intellectual side. The mind and body are two very different things; human beings have ...

This is a preview of the whole essay