• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How is Tension Built in The Crucible in Act 3

Extracts from this document...


The Crucible Arthur Miller was an American playwright who was born in 1915. Miller wrote The Crucible in 1953 during the McCarthy period when Americans were accusing each other of Pro-Communist beliefs. His purpose through writing 'The Crucible' was to express his own views on McCarthyism, and he does this through the main plot, the 17th century Salemwitch hunt, which has a stark similarity to the trials during the McCarthy period. The citizens of Salem were against each other in every way, and one accusation would lead to the arrest and murder of another person, unless they told of other names. At the end of the play, the two most honest and noble people are killed, Rebecca Nurse and John Proctor. This is an exact replica of what was happening in America during the 1950s and this play is an attack upon the McCarthy period of America. The setting of Act 3 can be understood as an attack on the harshness of the authorities in Salem and 1950's America. Act 3 starts with the stage directions and these go on for a few sentences, each one being quite specific about the situation. The language used is negative and disheartening, creating an unwanted feeling throughout the audience, almost as if they are not meant to be there; 'even forbidding'. We are told that 'sunlight (is) pouring through two high windows in the back wall' but is being swallowed by the darkness beneath. ...read more.


Parris, at the beginning of the play, is shown not to believe in witches. However, the overwhelming authority of Danforth and the court persuades him to think otherwise, and at the end of the play, he is shown to believe in witches. By making the most religious man in the play believe in witches, and fall victim to the power of Danforth, Miller is criticising the American society, where even the most religious and God-fearing people would leave their faith in order to save their lives. John Proctor, on the other hand, is shown to be a very Christ-like figure throughout the play. In the movie version, Proctor is shown to be in water when he chases Mary Warren after she has run out of court. When everyone is against him, he stands alone in the water, almost as if he is being baptised from the old Proctor to the new Proctor. By showing us this, Miller is hinting at the fact that only the people who told the truth were the real 'gods'; as Jesus Christ is believed to be in Christianity, and the others were just liars, who sacrificed their friends, or in Salem's case, their enemies, in order to save themselves. At first meeting, we think that Hale is McCarthy, as he appears to be very self-confident and arrogant; " they are weighted with authority". However, as we read further into the play, Hale seems to change, and realises the stupidity and injustice in the system. ...read more.


Proctor's damning lines at the end of the play suggest that there were some good people in Salem and in America during the 1950's-people who would give their lives for their loved ones. In the movie, Proctor is shown to be reciting the God's Prayer just before being hanged, and it was believed that witches were not able to recite the God's Prayer. By showing him do this, Miller is showing everyone how blatant it was that the innocent were dying, and he criticises the citizens of Salem for not realising this, in other words, he is criticising the American society. This has a negative effect on the audience, as they appreciate the injustice of McCarthy, and how the people were not doing anything to save anyone. Having considered the dramatic nature of this scene, I believe that it criticises McCarthyism and is an attack on the American society of the 1950's. Miller does this by repeatedly showing the Salem citizens as ignorant and unintelligent. He attacks Danforth time and time again, showing him to be weak, and yet he is able to have power over the people, only because of the fact that he has higher authority then they have. The innocent characters are the ones who are killed, and the guilty characters are the ones who get away with their crimes. This highlights the very point that during 1950's America, there was no justice whatsoever, and the only people who ruled were those who were of a higher rank than the normal citizens. ?? ?? ?? ?? Naaila Haq English Coursework 10g1 - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. How does Miller build up tension in Act 1 of the Crucible?

    Throughout the scene she is asleep and Miller ends the scene with her suddenly speaking. This builds up the suspense with the dramatic and powerful ending. "She speaks (he rushes to embrace Betty) She Speaks!" This shows the audience and characters are astonished at Betty's wakening.

  2. Crucible confession

    Proctor then tears up the confession. Parris takes great pain when Proctor tears up the confession he is described by Miller to act 'hysterically, as if the tearing up of the confession were his life.' This is the moment that the audience have been dreading and like the semi climax

  1. The Crucible Act 3

    But when Giles Corey pleads with Danforth to hear him out, claiming he has evidence proving Martha Corey's innocence and Danforth is set on the notion that Giles is only trying to disrupt the court, Hale speaks in defence of Giles. "Excellency, he claims hard evidence for his wife's defence.

  2. The Crucible - analysing acts 3 and 4.

    This change of heart and hopelessness, makes Hale gain the audience's sympathy but not its respect, since he lacks the moral character of Rebecca Nurse or, and as it turns out at the end of Act 4, John Proctor. Although Hale recognises the evil of the witch trials, his response is not resistance but surrender.

  1. How does Miller use the development of characters and their interaction with others to ...

    help inform the actors and director to better convey Millers message to the audience. "The Crucible" is set in seventeenth century (1692) Salem, Massachusetts, and based within newly established society, consisting of a group of English immigrants who followed a strict Christian belief system, known as Puritanism.

  2. Focusing on Act 3, to what extent is 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller an ...

    The way they dress and act. In the actual film most of the men are seen wearing black clothes, this may put forward that Salem is a holy religious society and believe very strongly in Christianity. If you take Judge Danforth, he adopts a blinkered attitude and refuses to use common sense and logic in dealing with these cases.

  1. Consider how Miller creates and maintains tension in Act 3 of The Crucible?

    This is one example of many where there are different meanings in the language. This description of the set creates an unsettling, mysterious tone at the start of the Act as there are no actors or actresses in view yet you are told you can hear their voices making a

  2. John Proctor is the tragic hero of "The Crucible". Discuss

    I?ll not have your suspicion anymore.? Proctor feels guilt because he knows her suspicions are deserved. Elizabeth also urges her husband to accuse Abigail of being a fraud; he refused at first, and she accused John of keeping emotions for Abigail.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work