How is the last scene (from ‘The lights rise on the apartment…’) a fitting and explosive conclusion to the play?

Authors Avatar
A View from a Bridge-Arthur Millar Philippa Griffiths

GCSE LITERATURE COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT

How is the last scene (from 'The lights rise on the apartment...') a fitting and explosive conclusion to the play?

In order to understand the last scene you must know the story of the whole play which I will briefly describe." A View from a Bridge" shows an insight into the life of a longshoreman called Eddie Carbone, who originally came from Scilly but is now living in the country of America in a slum near Brooklyn Bridge. He shares his life with his wife Beatrice and the girl, Catherine, who he has brought up as his own daughter and has grown a subconscious fanatical possessiveness for. Catherine is becoming of the age where she is old enough to go out to work and support herself, wanting to explore the many different enjoyments life has which she has been shielded from before. Eddie wants to keep her as a unchanged child, but Beatrice does not agree and the slight tension which lies in the family bubbles over after the arrival of two Scilian immigrants, cousins of Beatrice, who come into the household. Eddie initially gets on well with the elder brother Marco, who possesses many qualities that Eddie admires but, the manly qualities that Marco has become a threat to Eddie as tension between him and the brothers build up. Rodolpho is young, unmarried and obviously attractive to Catherine. Eddie has an instant dislike towards him and is overridden with jealousy because of the affections he is gathering and returning to Catherine. His hateful feelings are eventually enough to denounce both brothers to the Immigration authorities, which in a Scilian community is an unforgivable crime and so Marco kills him in the very last scene of the play.

In order to answer the question I must investigate the purpose of the play and conclude the possible reasons for characters actions. All mentally stable humans have morals which may relate to the environment the person was brought up in. This is what we believe distinguishes us humans from animals. It could be said that in the play Eddie behaves like an animal as in the concluding scene Marco shouts 'Anima-a-a-al', he seems to behave like he has no integrity, especially not the strict ideals of the Scilian community. I believe Eddie is in control of his morals which do basically follow the Scilian community e.g. protect your family in the way you think best, but his feelings are in turmoil causing Eddie to behave in an unexpected way e.g. denouncing illegal immigrants. Early on in Act 1 he was disgusted Vinny Bolzaro reported some immigrants that were staying with his family. And says ironically 'You'll never see him no more,a guy do a thing like that.' If Eddie had know himself better he could have made the denied feelings he had for Catherine clear before the problem spiralled out of control.

The need for compromise is evidently a very important theme in the play right from the beginning as Alfrieri says, 'Now we settle for half and I like it much better.' A compromise needs to be made so people feel satisfied that some of their needs to be made so people feel satisfied that some of their needs have been met and so they know what everybody else wants. Compromise was needed in a variety of instances in the play, firstly between Eddie, Beatrice and Catherine on the dispute about Catherine having more freedom, secondly between Eddie and Rodolpho about Catherine and lastly and probably the catastrophic conflict in the play between Eddie and Marco. They are two people from the same culture who ultimately what the same thing, an apology, eg Marco says ' Maybe he wants to apologise to me' and Eddie says 'He's gonna come here and apologise to me'. It is obvious if two people want the same thing off each other they are not going to get it what they want. The last scene is fitting to this theme because it shows if compromise is not taken the worst case scenario is death.

The play is still relevant to today as the primitive drives which control the characters in the play are present in today's society. Every single character in this play is driven by the endurance of primitive drives, which I will explain individually throughout the essay. The play clearly demonstrates to stop these drives which are inbuilt coming into force ,takes a lot of strength as most the time you are not aware of how you are behaving e.g. Catherine e.g. Beatrice says 'You still walk around in your slip' .As we are human we have a conscience and most of the time feel sorry with what we have done eg. Beatrice, 'Then we all belong in the garbage'. The characters in the play fight their instincts for a while until events push them over the edge and they lose control and their instincts take over.

The title clearly reflects the plays themes, one way to interpret the title is to say when you are viewing the landscape (Redhook) from the Brooklyn Bridge you are not personally involved but impartially as you are looking at the houses which people live in but are not concerned about their lives. This idea could go into the context of the audience witnessing the play being involved but only impartially as the outcome bares no real effect to their life. When you are having a view from a bridge you are looking at the exterior of the houses as the insides are blocked by solid walls this could be put in the context of the audience being shielded from the characters true motives, like they have put a wall across from letting you in. The bridge is Alferi who is a man socially higher up than all the other characters in the play so he is further along the process of becoming 'an American'. Brooklyn bridge is the way out of Red Hook and symbolically Alfieri is the bridge because he is higher up looking down on the community of Red Hook and also he is further along it than the other characters in the play therefore he is wiser than them.
Join now!


Miller wanted to make ' A view from a Bridge' a modern Greek Tragedy, hence the presence of the Chorus in Alfieri. I think the incorporation of the character Alfieri present inside and outside the action has worked extremely well to make it successful.. The audience look on the situation the same as the narrator Alfieri and feel on a par with him so when Alfieri becomes inside the action the gap between the audience and characters is narrowed, Alfieri therefore could be said to be lowering the bridge and giving the audience a close look. Alfieri is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay