• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Reliable is the 1916 film of The Battle of the Somme? Geoffrey Malins (1886-1940) was one of two official British photographers assigned to the Western Front

Extracts from this document...


How Reliable is the 1916 film of The Battle of the Somme? Geoffrey Malins (1886-1940) was one of two official British photographers assigned to the Western Front during the First World War. He is chiefly remembered today for the film The Battle of the Somme shown to huge success in British cinemas in the late summer of 1916.Considered risky at the time, the decision to allow Geoffrey Malins to compile a film based upon the initial attacks on the Somme in July 1916 proved a massive success when put on general release in late August and September that year. The completed film spanned five reels and lasted 62 minutes and 50 seconds. Its first screening took place to an invited audience at the Scala Theatre on the 10th of August 1916, while the battle still raged. On 21st of August the film began showing simultaneously in 34 London cinemas, opening in provincial cities the following week. The Royal Family received a private screening at Windsor Castle in September. The film was eventually shown in 18 countries. Although it is estimated that some twenty million tickets were bought for the film it was considered overly graphic by some, sparking a correspondence on the matter in the Times newspaper. In my essay I will explain whether the film was a reliable source of information about The Battle of the Somme, or if people were correct in believing that it was not reliable. ...read more.


The film also portrays that the British didn't dislike the Germans; this can be support by a letter by Second Lieutenant Dougan Chater. In the letter he states on Christmas Day 1914 "about 10am today I was peeping over the parapet when I saw a German waving his arms and presently two of them got out of their trenches and came towards ours... in about two minutes the ground between the two lines of trenches was swarming the men and officers of both sides" The source suggests that the German and the British were equal and that their was no real hatred, and that the hatred was just exaggerated by the media - Nobody could of known what the Battle of the Somme was like better than a soldier who was fighting in it. Another key message in the film was British soldiers attitude to war - that they wanted too fight and had a good morale throughout. Two songs that they used to sing imply that they did have good morale because they were singing. On the other hand not all sources support the view of the film, for example an extract from the diary of Sergeant S.V Britten, from The Royal Highlands of Canada: He states that the trench conditions were awful and that soldiers were even using human bodies as sandbags. ...read more.


If the film were to show how the British really were getting on, they certainly would not have fake scenes in it. To make a fair judgement about the film you have to question the reliability of some of the sources I am using to support or to go against the film. Some sources can be biased and fake: The photograph of the soldiers blinded by a gas attack for example. There were no gas attacks in the Battle of the Somme and the photo was taken in April 1918, after the battle of Somme. The photo tells us that sources can be very unreliable at times. More evidence that sources can be unreliable are newspapers. William Beach Thomas reported about the Battle of the Somme for the daily mail and the daily mirror and says "that the great part of the information supplied by us by the British army was utterly wrong and misleading." Newspapers were reporting to the British public on how the army was "doing", and the film apparently had the same aim. If newspapers can lie like they did to the public, how can anyone not say that a film could not do the same? In conclusion I think that the film was fake and was propaganda because thee government wanted more soldiers to sign up, and to get the country backing the war democratically. If they country did this, Britain would probably win and become economically superior to other countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. The battle of the Somme - This analysis is to debate whether or not ...

    however the rest of the film would obviously have some elements of truth. But this piece of film agrees that the battle should not have... ...been fought because if the government had to hide the truth, the truth must have been bad for it not to be shown to the public.

  2. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    destroyed buildings. These clips also confirm the myth by mentioning 'The few' who are 'winning' the battle for air superiority. They are very nationalistic, because these newsreels have been made by British people. This is a very easy way to spread the myth between the nation, because these clips are a good way of getting through to the people.

  1. The Battle of Britain

    This interpretation was based on Churchill's own knowledge. He was also a skilled historian as well as a politician. He appealed to a wide audience and it was written after the War so Churchill could evaluate the evidence and not think in terms of Propaganda.

  2. The Crimean War.

    at capturing the Russian guns, proved a bad omen to many in command, who would prefer to stay away, than risk being shot at by their own guns.41 Terrified of an immediate attack from the allied forces, the Russians had removed all but 18000 men from their main base at

  1. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as a great military ...

    pals' battalion's regiments, you need to know how they greatly affected small communities. For instance Leeds and Accrington were almost completely wiped of their male population. This was the ultimate downside to the pals' regiments; people virtually lost everyone they knew in their community.

  2. Saving Private Ryan Examine Steven Spielberg's use of images and Presentation of war. ...

    This view shows us that the Germans had an advantage over those on the beach and it also shows us how the Germans are just men too it does this using an over shoulder shot, it shows the enemy as faceless.

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Albert Speer - a leading Nazi throughout the war - claimed in his book "Inside the Third Reich" that a number of important decisions were made based on Goering's ignorance. As Goering did not understand the importance of something, it was dismissed as unnecessary for success.

  2. 'Stalingrad was the most significant turning point of the war on the Eastern Front ...

    The limitation with this is that it is one person's view, which may not have been shared by the whole army. Source H shows how German morale lowered due to the battle. There were 'doubts among the civilian population and in high military circles.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work