• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Reliable is the 1916 film of The Battle of the Somme? Geoffrey Malins (1886-1940) was one of two official British photographers assigned to the Western Front

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Reliable is the 1916 film of The Battle of the Somme? Geoffrey Malins (1886-1940) was one of two official British photographers assigned to the Western Front during the First World War. He is chiefly remembered today for the film The Battle of the Somme shown to huge success in British cinemas in the late summer of 1916.Considered risky at the time, the decision to allow Geoffrey Malins to compile a film based upon the initial attacks on the Somme in July 1916 proved a massive success when put on general release in late August and September that year. The completed film spanned five reels and lasted 62 minutes and 50 seconds. Its first screening took place to an invited audience at the Scala Theatre on the 10th of August 1916, while the battle still raged. On 21st of August the film began showing simultaneously in 34 London cinemas, opening in provincial cities the following week. The Royal Family received a private screening at Windsor Castle in September. The film was eventually shown in 18 countries. Although it is estimated that some twenty million tickets were bought for the film it was considered overly graphic by some, sparking a correspondence on the matter in the Times newspaper. In my essay I will explain whether the film was a reliable source of information about The Battle of the Somme, or if people were correct in believing that it was not reliable. ...read more.

Middle

The film also portrays that the British didn't dislike the Germans; this can be support by a letter by Second Lieutenant Dougan Chater. In the letter he states on Christmas Day 1914 "about 10am today I was peeping over the parapet when I saw a German waving his arms and presently two of them got out of their trenches and came towards ours... in about two minutes the ground between the two lines of trenches was swarming the men and officers of both sides" The source suggests that the German and the British were equal and that their was no real hatred, and that the hatred was just exaggerated by the media - Nobody could of known what the Battle of the Somme was like better than a soldier who was fighting in it. Another key message in the film was British soldiers attitude to war - that they wanted too fight and had a good morale throughout. Two songs that they used to sing imply that they did have good morale because they were singing. On the other hand not all sources support the view of the film, for example an extract from the diary of Sergeant S.V Britten, from The Royal Highlands of Canada: He states that the trench conditions were awful and that soldiers were even using human bodies as sandbags. ...read more.

Conclusion

If the film were to show how the British really were getting on, they certainly would not have fake scenes in it. To make a fair judgement about the film you have to question the reliability of some of the sources I am using to support or to go against the film. Some sources can be biased and fake: The photograph of the soldiers blinded by a gas attack for example. There were no gas attacks in the Battle of the Somme and the photo was taken in April 1918, after the battle of Somme. The photo tells us that sources can be very unreliable at times. More evidence that sources can be unreliable are newspapers. William Beach Thomas reported about the Battle of the Somme for the daily mail and the daily mirror and says "that the great part of the information supplied by us by the British army was utterly wrong and misleading." Newspapers were reporting to the British public on how the army was "doing", and the film apparently had the same aim. If newspapers can lie like they did to the public, how can anyone not say that a film could not do the same? In conclusion I think that the film was fake and was propaganda because thee government wanted more soldiers to sign up, and to get the country backing the war democratically. If they country did this, Britain would probably win and become economically superior to other countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why did William win at the Battle of Hastings?

    "The vigorous courage of a few men armed in a just cause and specially protected from Heaven must prevail against a host of men unskilled in combat. Only be bold so that nothing shall make you yield, and victory will gladden your hearts" (A report of William's words found in English Historical Documents)

  2. Why Did So Many Men die in the Battle of the Somme?

    The army will cross no mans land walking (so that they can stay in line). They will capture the German Trenches. This plan ended up a failure it can be argued by the primary sources of evidence, which are from a book called challenge and change world study after 1900.

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    This poster fails to mention the death and makes the battle out to be a 'clean fight' and doesn't portray the true reality of war. The failure to mention such factors as the radar system makes it rather unreliable. The Daily Express constantly fed news to the civilian population as well as asking for more recruits within the articles published.

  2. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    The weaknesses of this interpretation are that is very biased towards Britain, it gives only a British side of view. The poster is also propaganda so it may miss out important facts and exaggerate facts, which favor the British. Interpretation 7.

  1. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as a great military ...

    Reliable tanks would have been able; to be used at the Somme if it had started at the planned time; however the battle of the Somme went ahead before Haig had planned.

  2. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

    Therefore the Somme was a disaster but also reasons to make me think that the Somme should not be regarded as such a great calamity. The overall casualties were mostly volunteers who mostly joined with Kitchener's pal's battalions. The pal's battalions could be referred to as the most traumatic and tragic episode of the Somme.

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    They could keep hitting the Germans until they could no longer afford to take any more damage. It is understood that the Germans were also provoked into attacking cities as Britain had been attacking German cities anyway. From August 23rd to September 6th, the Luftwaffe started night time bombing raids on cities.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    Two months after the assault had begun the original offensive was renewed, but to no avail. The next few months, upto the end of the battle in mid-November saw torrential rain, which turned the site into a quagmire. Then, on the 13th November after an estimated 1,245,000 deaths the battle ended.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work