How Successful Do you Consider Act 1: Scene 1 of King Lear to be?

Authors Avatar

How successful do you consider Act 1:1 of King Lear to be?

How Successful Do you Consider Act 1: Scene 1 of King Lear to be?

The play King Lear has been described as Shakespeare’s most ambitious and brilliant work, and has been met with both strong condemnation and awe-inspired praise since it’s composition in 1606. The opening scene is heavily dramatic and eventful, detailing the splitting of Lear’s kingdom, his banishment of daughter Cordelia and servant Kent, and the worries of the character for Lear’s mental health. It is written and structured expertly, and presents the play’s most important themes, issues and relationships in the language that will dominate the play.

The play begins with a conversation between the Earl of Kent, the Earl of Gloucester and his illegitimate son Edmund. They discuss the imminent division of the kingdom and reveal that the king is to make a decision between two dukes: Kent suggests that ‘the King had more affected the Duke of Albany than Cornwall’. The exposition here is minimal, as the first event of consequence in the play is Lear’s division of the kingdom, but this does allow us to see that Lear has changed. Gloucester admits that ‘It did always seem so to us… but in the division of the kingdom, it appears not which of the dukes [Lear] values most’.

The purpose of this conversation is really to introduce the sub-plot. Gloucester introduces his son and refers to him as a ‘knave’ and ‘whoreson’, and jests about his conception; ‘there was good sport at his making’. This shows us the prejudice with which Edmund must live due to his illegitimacy, and provides the impetus for Edmund’s later scheme against his brother.  Explaining key details of the plot and introducing the sub-plot in the first scene is effective, because it establishes immediately that the play is not entirely focused on Lear and provides a clear motivation for Edmund’s later actions.

Join now!

The plot is more fully explained in Lear’s address to the court, where he summarises the significance of France and Burgundy – ‘long in court have made their amorous sojourn’ – and explains that his intent is to confer his responsibilities onto ‘younger strengths’ in a move to ‘unburdened crawl towards death’. The exposition is clear and makes sense in the context of the play, with Lear summarising the events that have transpired to draw attention to the gravity of the events that are about to happen, describing his will as a  ‘fast intent’ and ‘darker purpose’. It has ...

This is a preview of the whole essay