• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I have chosen to speak about the Congestion Charge which was introduced in London.

Extracts from this document...


Congestion charging I have chosen to speak about the Congestion Charge which was introduced in London. I chose this subject as I feel that it is a focus on current affairs and it may well have an effect on us in the near future. London has always been a bustling capital, but it seems that it can no longer take the strain. It is said that 2 million people live in central London and 1 million people enter with 400,000 vehicles an hour. And yet the average speed is only 2.9 mph. This is a statistic that London shouldn't be proud of. If you put this up against a horse and cart from the 1900's for a race, then the horse and cart would win. It is said that 50% of time spent within the boundaries are also spent stationary and that on average there is 3 minutes of delay for every mile in the charging zone. ...read more.


It was predicted that up to 4km of traffic would encircle the boundary for up to 6 hours when the charge was introduced. If the government really want to reduce the congestion, then maybe they should raise the charge to �15 or maybe even �20. At least this would make people stop and think twice. The cameras are not thought to be good enough for the job. Also it is thought that the database does not pick up 10% - 15% of car's number plates. Many people are already finding ways to avoid paying like buying motorcycles, which are excluded from the charge. This whole concept is to encourage people to use public transport more. The central line was closed around the time the charge was introduced, and it was thought the starting date might be delayed. ...read more.


But it was said that the charge would produce an income of �130 million per year and all this will be fed back into the system. Other schemes are in place in Toronto and Singapore, but does this necessarily mean that London can pull it off as well? I feel that action should be taken, but a lot more planning and looking at the consequences should be taken into account. Other options could be to restrict the amount of cars entering the zone or as I said before raise the charge to maybe �15. Also some of the raise money should be put into the health and education systems. Although traffic levels and congestion in Central London have decreased even more than predicted, many groups are still unhappy. The shopkeepers are upset because they have lost trade, and even the people running the scheme are not entirely happy because the amount of money they expected to raise from the charge is less than they expected. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE William Blake section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE William Blake essays

  1. Economics: Reasons for Congestion charging zone

    The fee of �5 a day for driving in central London between 0700 GMT and 1830 GMT was introduced on 17 February. Traffic levels have been reduced by about 20% in the charging zone He added that other local authorities would be looking at the London system but warned that it had to be combined with other measures.

  2. Analyse the impact of the transport revolution on Victorian London

    West End as was the case of the railways in earlier years. In doing so, trams played a role in creating a social divide between the upper and lower classes in London. But trams soon found their niche in the industry and by 1875, the trams had extended to the

  1. Evaluate the success (or otherwise) of the congestion charge now in operation in London? ...

    In other smaller congested areas, it would not be practical due to the size of other cities and it also will not be as financially viable. This is because other smaller congested areas have not as much congestion as central London thus not as much revenue will be created by the scheme in other areas.

  2. London Knights - Situation analysis.

    The Knights always invite the press to come and watch the match so there would be chances where the press can write an article the next day for London Knights in the newspaper. The press get in through the VIP entrance and they get to sit in the press box!

  1. Congestion Charging.

    3.3 Major firms like Safeway are for congestion charging. Because there will be less congestion in the Central London, their products can be transported by lorry from one destination to another faster than before. 3.4 The taxi companies are for congestion charging because people will be using the black cabs and taxis more than before, especially those who live

  2. London requires world class infrastructure and a transport system which maximises the city's economic ...

    freeze bus fares for the next three years; ? introduce a 70p flat bus fare ahead of implementation of the proposed central London congestion charging scheme; ? limit Underground fare increases to the rate of inflation for the next three years; ?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work